KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2011 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 5

Studies on the anatomical structure of stems of willow (Salix L.) species (Salicaceae) growing in Ankara province, Turkey

Okan ARIHAN
Ayşegül GÜVENÇ
Sayfa
535–551
Yayın Tarihi
2011-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The anatomical study of these 9 species does not indicate significant separations in morphological observations but instead yields data that can be used in taxonomy.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was conducted on the anatomical structure of the stems of 9 Salix L. (willow) species (9 taxa) growing in Ankara, Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:These taxa are S. triandra L. subsp. triandra, S. alba L., S. excelsa J.F.Gmel., S. fragilis L., S. babylonica L., S. caprea L., S. cinerea L., S. pseudomedemii E.Wolf, and S. amplexicaulis Bory & Chaub.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The anatomical study of these 9 species does not indicate significant separations in morphological observations but instead yields data that can be used in taxonomy.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Key words: Willow · Salix · Salicaceae

Özet

This study was conducted on the anatomical structure of the stems of 9 Salix L. (willow) species (9 taxa) growing in Ankara, Turkey. These taxa are S. triandra L. subsp. triandra, S. alba L., S. excelsa J.F.Gmel., S. fragilis L., S. babylonica L., S. caprea L., S. cinerea L., S. pseudomedemii E.Wolf, and S. amplexicaulis Bory & Chaub. Illustrations and photographs were obtained of microscopic views of cross sections from the stems of each taxon. The differing anatomical structures of stems of the Salix species are suitable for use as an additional tool in identification. Our aim was to contribute information on anatomy for the taxonomy of this highly variable genus. The anatomical study of these 9 species does not indicate significant separations in morphological observations but instead yields data that can be used in taxonomy.

Abstract

This study was conducted on the anatomical structure of the stems of 9 Salix L. (willow) species (9 taxa) growing in Ankara, Turkey. These taxa are S. triandra L. subsp. triandra, S. alba L., S. excelsa J.F.Gmel., S. fragilis L., S. babylonica L., S. caprea L., S. cinerea L., S. pseudomedemii E.Wolf, and S. amplexicaulis Bory & Chaub. Illustrations and photographs were obtained of microscopic views of cross sections from the stems of each taxon. The differing anatomical structures of stems of the Salix species are suitable for use as an additional tool in identification. Our aim was to contribute information on anatomy for the taxonomy of this highly variable genus. The anatomical study of these 9 species does not indicate significant separations in morphological observations but instead yields data that can be used in taxonomy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ARIHAN, O., GÜVENÇ, A. (2011). Studies on the anatomical structure of stems of willow (Salix L.) species (Salicaceae) growing in Ankara province, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 5, 535–551. https://ajindex.com/articles/183617

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Argus GW (1997). Infrageneric classifi cation of Salix L. (Salicaceae) in the New World. Systematic Botany Monographs 52. Arıhan O & Güvenç A (2009). Ankara çevresinde yetişen söğüt (Salix L.) türleri. Ot Sistematik Botanik Dergisi 16: 15-52.
  2. Azuma T, Kajita T, Yokoyama J & Ohashi H (2000). Phylogenetic relationships of Salix (Salicaceae) based on rbcL sequence data. Am J Bot 87: 67-75.
  3. Baytop T (1999). Türkiye’de Bitkiler ile Tedavi (Geçmişte ve Bugün), 2. Baskı, p. 34. İstanbul:
  4. Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri. Chen JH, Sun H, Wen J & Yang YP (2010). Molecular phylogeny of Salix L. (Salicaceae) inferred from three chloroplast datasets and its systematic implications. Taxon 59: 29-37.
  5. Commission E Monographs (1998). Complete German Commission E Monographs: In: Blumenthal M & Buse WR (eds.) Th erapeutic Guide to Herbal Medicines. American Botanical Council. Austin, Texas: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Cooper RL & Cass DD (2001). Comparative evaluation of vessel elements in Salix spp. (Salicaceae) endemic to Athabasca sand dunes of northern Saskatchewan, Canada. Am J Bot 4: 583-587. Çelebioğlu S & Baytop T (1949). Bitkisel Tozların Tetkiki İçin Yeni Bir Reaktif. İstanbul:
  6. Farmakognozi Enstitüsü Yayınları, No 10. Dong X & Zhang X (2001). Some observations of the adaptations of sandy shrubs to the arid environment in the Mu Us Sandland: leaf water relations and anatomic features. J Arid Environ 48: 41-48.
  7. Donner J (1990). Distribution maps to P.H. Davis “Flora of Turkey 1-10.” Linzer Biologische Beitrage 2: 381-515.
  8. Esau K (1965). Plant Anatomy, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley. Fang Z, Zhao S & Skvortsov AK (1999). Salicaceae. In: Wu Z, Raven PH (eds.) Flora of China. Beijing – St. Louis: Science Press – Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
  9. Güner A (2000). Salix L. In: Güner A, Özhatay N, Ekim T & Başer KHC (eds.) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands Vol. 11. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Güner A & Zielinski J (1993). Salix rizeensis (Salicaceae): a new willow from NE Turkey. Karaca Arboretum 1: 1-5. Güvenç A & Duman H (2010). Morphological and anatomical studies of annual species of Sideritis L. (Lamiaceae), with notes on chorology in Turkey. Turk J Bot 34: 83-104.
  10. Güvenç A, Hürkul MM & Erdem A. (2011). Th e leaf anatomy of Juniperus L. (Cupressaceae) species naturally distributed in Turkey. Turk J Bot (in press). Heywood VH, Brummitt RK, Culham A & Seberg O (2006). Flowering Plant Families of the World. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens. Mabberley DJ (2008). Salix