KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2013 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 6

Molecular phylogeny of Galanthus (Amaryllidaceae) of Anatolia inferred from multiple nuclear and chloroplast DNA regions

Nivart Taşci MARGOZ
İbrahim Sırrı YÜZBAŞIOĞLU
Zeynep ÇELEN
Tuna EKİM
Ayşe Neşe BİLGİN
Sayfa
993–1007
Yayın Tarihi
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sequencing data also revealed that the G. xvalentinei from locus classicus (ISTF; SYZB 3008) significantly differed from all other Galanthus specimens distributed in Thrace known as G. xvalentinei.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Anatolia hosts 14 of the 22 taxa of genus Galanthus L.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The phylogenetic relationships of Galanthus species were explored using DNA sequence data from both nuclear and chloroplast DNA of 70 specimens covering all subdivisions of Galanthus present in Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sequencing data also revealed that the G. xvalentinei from locus classicus (ISTF; SYZB 3008) significantly differed from all other Galanthus specimens distributed in Thrace known as G. xvalentinei.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:70 specimens
⚙️Değişkenler:Key words: Galanthus · Amaryllidaceae · molecular phylogeny

Özet

Anatolia hosts 14 of the 22 taxa of genus Galanthus L. The phylogenetic relationships of Galanthus species were explored using DNA sequence data from both nuclear and chloroplast DNA of 70 specimens covering all subdivisions of Galanthus present in Turkey. Our data showed that species of the same geography clustered together phylogenetically, in contrast to the presently recognized taxonomy based on morphological characters. The 5.8S rRNA sequence data by itself is sufficiently informative for constructing phylogenetic trees. Our data confirm the identity of Galanthus koenenianus as a new taxon, well separated from G. alpinus; both are clustered within subseries Viridifolii, rather than within subseries Glaucaefolii in contrast to previous suggestions, but in accordance with their geographical occurrence. G. trojanus also forms a distinct branch within subseries Glaucaefolii. G. krasnovii diverged out of all other Galanthus taxa as a separate branch in all phylogenetic trees. Samples collected based on morphological characters as G. nivalis were clearly different from G. nivalis based on the sequence data in GenBank. Sequencing data also revealed that the G. xvalentinei from locus classicus (ISTF; SYZB 3008) significantly differed from all other Galanthus specimens distributed in Thrace known as G. xvalentinei.

Abstract

Anatolia hosts 14 of the 22 taxa of genus Galanthus L. The phylogenetic relationships of Galanthus species were explored using DNA sequence data from both nuclear and chloroplast DNA of 70 specimens covering all subdivisions of Galanthus present in Turkey. Our data showed that species of the same geography clustered together phylogenetically, in contrast to the presently recognized taxonomy based on morphological characters. The 5.8S rRNA sequence data by itself is sufficiently informative for constructing phylogenetic trees. Our data confirm the identity of Galanthus koenenianus as a new taxon, well separated from G. alpinus; both are clustered within subseries Viridifolii, rather than within subseries Glaucaefolii in contrast to previous suggestions, but in accordance with their geographical occurrence. G. trojanus also forms a distinct branch within subseries Glaucaefolii. G. krasnovii diverged out of all other Galanthus taxa as a separate branch in all phylogenetic trees. Samples collected based on morphological characters as G. nivalis were clearly different from G. nivalis based on the sequence data in GenBank. Sequencing data also revealed that the G. xvalentinei from locus classicus (ISTF; SYZB 3008) significantly differed from all other Galanthus specimens distributed in Thrace known as G. xvalentinei.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MARGOZ, N. T., YÜZBAŞIOĞLU, İ. S., ÇELEN, Z., EKİM, T., BİLGİN, A. N. (2013). Molecular phylogeny of Galanthus (Amaryllidaceae) of Anatolia inferred from multiple nuclear and chloroplast DNA regions. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 6, 993–1007. https://ajindex.com/articles/183605

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Alvarez I, Wendel JF (2003). Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol Phylogenet Evol 29: 417–434.
  2. Artjushenko ZT (1967). Taxonomy of the genus Galanthus L. In: The Daffodil and Tulip Year Book, Vol. 32. London, UK: Royal Horticultural Society, pp. 62–82.
  3. Bakış Y, Otu HH, Taşçı N, Meydan C, Bilgin N, Yüzbaşıoğlu S, Sezerman OU (2013). Testing robustness of relative complexity measure method constructing robust phylogenetic trees for Galanthus L. using the relative complexity measure. BMC Bioinformatics 14: 20–31.
  4. Baldwin BG, Campbell CS, Porter JM, Sanderson MJ, Wojciechowski MF, Donoghue MJ (1995). Utility of nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences in phylogenetic analysis of angiosperms. Ann Mo Bot Gard 82: 247–277.
  5. Bishop M, Davis AP, Grimshaw J (2001). Snowdrops: A Monograph of Cultivated Galanthus. Salisbury, Australia: The Griffin Press.
  6. Friesen N, Fritsch RM, Blattner FR (2006). Phylogeny and new infrageneric classification of Allium L. (Alliaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS sequences. Aliso 22: 372–395.
  7. Garcia-Jacas N, Susanna A, Garnatje T, Vilatersana R (2001). Generic delimitation and phylogeny of the subtribe Centaureinae (Asteraceae): a combined nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis. Ann Bot-London 87: 503–515.
  8. Gielly L, Taberlet P (1994). The use of chloroplast DNA to resolve plant phylogenesis: noncoding versus rbcL sequences. Mol Biol Evol 11: 769–777.
  9. Hall TA (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis. Program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucl Acid S 41: 95–98.
  10. Mai JC, Coleman AW (1996). The internal transcribed spacer 2 exhibits a common secondary structure in green algae and flowering plants. J Mol Evol 44: 258–271.
  11. Jobes DV, Thien LB (1997). A conserved motif in the 5.8S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene is a useful diagnostic marker for plant internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. Plant Mol Biol Rep 15: 326–334.
  12. Kemularia-Nathadze LM (1947). A study of the Caucasian representatives of the genus Galanthus L. Trudy. Tbilisk Botanical Institute Series 2, 11: 165–190.
  13. Kimura M (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16: 111–120.
  14. Koch M, Haubold B, Mitchell-Olds T (2001). Molecular systematics of the Brassicaceae: evidence from coding plastidic matK and nuclear Chs sequences. Am J Bot 88: 534–544.
  15. Lledo MD, Davis AP, Crespo MB, Chase MW, Fay MF (2004). Phylogen