KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

Karyotypic phylogeny and polyploidy variations of Paronychia Caryophyllaceae taxa in Turkey

Halil Erhan EROĞLU
Derya ALTAY
Ümit BUDAK
Esra MARTİN
Sayfa
245–254
Yayın Tarihi
2020-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The determination of the karyological data of all species is very important to understand karyotype evolution and chromosomal phylogeny in Paronychia.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Chromosomal data can provide very valuable information about karyotypic phylogeny and speciation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this context, the results are these: 1 in 14 taxa, the first report on chromosomes numbers; 2 in 2 taxa, equal chromosome numbers as in the previous report; 3 in all taxa, the first report of detailed karyotype analyses; 4 karyotype asymmetry data and generally symmetrical karyotypes; 5 karyotypic variations by mechanisms of dysploidy and polyploidy; and 6 phylogenetic relationships in Paronychia.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The determination of the karyological data of all species is very important to understand karyotype evolution and chromosomal phylogeny in Paronychia.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Karyology · Paronychia · phylogeny

Abstract

Chromosomal data can provide very valuable information about karyotypic phylogeny and speciation. This is the first study on karyotype phylogeny and polyploidy variations of the genus Paronychia. In this context, the results are these: 1 in 14 taxa, the first report on chromosomes numbers; 2 in 2 taxa, equal chromosome numbers as in the previous report; 3 in all taxa, the first report of detailed karyotype analyses; 4 karyotype asymmetry data and generally symmetrical karyotypes; 5 karyotypic variations by mechanisms of dysploidy and polyploidy; and 6 phylogenetic relationships in Paronychia. The data indicate that Anatolia is an important area for the distribution of Paronychia. In light of all data, karyotype evolution is briefly summarized. The ancestral karyotype was x = 9 millions of years ago . The karyotypes x = 8 and x = 7 were then shaped by dysploidy. The rate of polyploidization then significantly increased in the genus. However, data should be supported by molecular analysis. In addition, the chromosome numbers of 8 species of Turkish Paronychia is still unknown. The determination of the karyological data of all species is very important to understand karyotype evolution and chromosomal phylogeny in Paronychia.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EROĞLU, H. E., ALTAY, D., BUDAK, Ü., MARTİN, E. (2020). Karyotypic phylogeny and polyploidy variations of Paronychia Caryophyllaceae taxa in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 245–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/182715

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Altay D, Eroğlu HE, Hamzaoğlu E, Koç M (2017). Karyotype analysis of some taxa of Dianthus section Verruculosi (Caryophyllaceae, Sileneae). Turkish Journal of Botany 41: 367-374. doi: 10.3906/ bot-1612-30
  2. Altınordu F, Peruzzi L, Yu Y, He XJ (2016). A tool for the analysis of chromosomes: KaryoType. Taxon 65: 586-592. doi: 10.12705/653.9 Alvarez S (2010). Evolution and systematics of locally endemic Paronychia (Caryophyllaceae) in South America. MS, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden. Baltisberger M, Hörandl E (2016). Karyotype evolution supports the molecular phylogeny in the genus Ranunculus (Ranunculaceae). Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 18: 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2015.11.001 Bittrich V (1993). Caryophyllaceae. In: Kubitzki K, Rohwer J, Bittrich V (editors). The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Magnoliid, Hamamelid, and Caryophyllid Families. Vol. 2. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 206-236.
  3. Blackburn KB, Morton JK (1957). The incidence of polyploidy in the Caryophyllaceae of Britain and of Portugal. New Phytologist 56: 344-351. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1957.tb06979.x Chaudhri MN (1967). Paronychia Mill. In: Davis PH (editor). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol. 2. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 250-262.
  4. Chaudhri MN (1968). A Revision of the Paronychinae. Utrecht, Netherlands: Tilburg, H. Gianotten. Demirci Kayıran S, Özhatay FN (2017). A karyomorphological study on the genus Muscari Mill. growing in Kahramanmaraş (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Botany 41: 289-298. doi: 10.3906/ bot-1605-6
  5. Diosdado JC, Pastor J (1994). Estudio cariologico del gĕnero Paronychia Miller (Caryophyllaceae) en Andalucĭa (Espana). Acta Botanica Malacitana 19: 89-95 (in Spanish). Eroğlu HE, Şimşek N, Koç M, Hamzaoğlu E (2013). Karyotype analysis of some Minuartia L. (Caryophyllaceae) taxa. Plant Systematics and Evolution 299: 67-73. doi: 10.1007/s00606- 012-0703-8
  6. Eroğlu HE (2015). Which chromosomes are subtelocentric or acrocentric? A new karyotype symmetry/asymmetry index. Caryologia 68: 239-245. doi: 10.1080/00087114.2015.1032614 Eroğlu HE, Doğan H, Altay D, Budak Ü (2017). The medicinal plant of genus Paronychia and the karyotype analysis of Paronychia adalia. International Journal of Secondary Metabolite 4 (3): 103-107. doi: 10.21448/ijsm.363827 Fedorov AA (1974). Chromosome Numbers of Flowering Plants. Leningrad, USSR: Komarov Botanical Institute. Harpke D, Carta A, Tomović G, Ranđelović V, Ranđelović N et al.