Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2010 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3

Cytogenetic study on the European brown hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) (Mammalia: Lagomorpha) in Turkey

Sayfa
247–252
Yayın Tarihi
2010-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Variation was found in the C-banded karyotype and the distribution of NORs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Conventional and GTC, CTC, and AgNO3 banded karyotypes of brown hares (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) from Turkey are described for the first time.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:All specimens possessed a diploid number of 2n = 48 chromosomes and a fundamental autosomal number of NFa = 88.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Variation was found in the C-banded karyotype and the distribution of NORs.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Key words: Lepus europaeus · G-banding · C-banding

Özet

Conventional and GTC, CTC, and AgNO3 banded karyotypes of brown hares (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) from Turkey are described for the first time. All specimens possessed a diploid number of 2n = 48 chromosomes and a fundamental autosomal number of NFa = 88. The chromosome set consisted of 8 metacentric and submetacentric pairs and 15 subtelocentric and acrocentric pairs decreasing in size from large to small. The X chromosome was a large submetacentric while the Y was a small acrocentric. In contrast with the other specimens, the Kilis specimen possessed a duplication in the long arm of one of the subtelocentric chromosomes. The G-banding pattern of the chromosomes was similar to that given for the genus. Variation was found in the C-banded karyotype and the distribution of NORs.

Abstract

Conventional and GTC, CTC, and AgNO3 banded karyotypes of brown hares (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) from Turkey are described for the first time. All specimens possessed a diploid number of 2n = 48 chromosomes and a fundamental autosomal number of NFa = 88. The chromosome set consisted of 8 metacentric and submetacentric pairs and 15 subtelocentric and acrocentric pairs decreasing in size from large to small. The X chromosome was a large submetacentric while the Y was a small acrocentric. In contrast with the other specimens, the Kilis specimen possessed a duplication in the long arm of one of the subtelocentric chromosomes. The G-banding pattern of the chromosomes was similar to that given for the genus. Variation was found in the C-banded karyotype and the distribution of NORs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEMİRBAŞ, Y., AŞAN, N., ALBAYRAK, İ. (2010). Cytogenetic study on the European brown hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) (Mammalia: Lagomorpha) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3, 247–252. https://ajindex.com/articles/182410

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Ben Slimen H, Suchentrunk F, Memmi A et al. Evolutionary relationships among hares from North Africa (Lepus sp. or Lepus spp.) cape hares (L. capensis) from South Africa, and Brown hares (L. europaeus) as inferred from mtDNA PCR- RFLP and allozyme data. J Zool Syst Evol Res 44: 88-99, 2006.
  2. Ben Slimen H, Suchentrunk F, Stamatis C et al. Population genetics of cape and brown hares (Lepus capensis and L. europaeus): A test of Petter’s hypothesis of conspecificity. Biochem Syst Ecol 36: 22-39, 2008.
  3. Schröder J, Suomalainen van der WL, Schröder E. Karyotypes in lymphocytes of two strains of rabbit, and two species of hare. Hereditas 83: 183-188, 1978.
  4. Zima J, Kral B. Karyotypes of European mammals. Acta Sci Nat Acad Scien 7: 1-53, 1984.
  5. Ford CE, Hamerton JL. A colchicines, hypotonic citrate, squash sequence for mammalian chromosomes. Stain Technology 31: 247-251, 1956.
  6. Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK. Molecular Systematics. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts, 655 pp; 1996. Seabright M. A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2: 971-972, 1971.
  7. Howell WM, Black DA. Controlled silver staining for nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: A 1-step method. Experientia 36: 1014-1015, 1980. Sumner AT. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Experimental Cell Research 75: 304-306, 1972.
  8. Lorenzo C, Cervantes FA, Francisco Y et al. Bandas chromosomicas c de Los generos Romerolagus, Sylvilagus y Lepus (Mammalia: Lagomorpha) de Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Mastozoologica 4: 84-94, 2000.
  9. Cervantes FA, Rojas-Vilaria A, Lorenzo C et al. Chromosomal differentiation between the jackrabbits Lepus insularis and Lepus californicus from Baja California Sur, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Mastozoologica 4: 40-52, 2000. Stock AD. Chromosome banding pattern relationships of hares, rabbits and pikas (order Lagomorpha). Cytogenet Cell Genet 17: 78-88, 1976.
  10. Miller OJ, Miller DA, Dev VG et al. Expression of human and suppression of Mouse nucleolar organizer activity in Mouse- human somatic cell hybrids. P Natl Acad Sci USA 73: 4532- 4535, 1976.
  11. Croce CM, Talavera A, Basilico C et al. Suppression of production of mouse 28 S ribosomal RNA in Mouse-human hybrids segregating mouse chromosomes. P Natl Acad Sci USA 74: 694-697, 1977.
  12. Suchentrunk F, Alkon PU, Willing R et al. Epigenetic dental variability of Israeli hares (Lepus sp.) ecogenetic or phylogenetic causation. J of Zool Lond 252: 503-515, 2000.
  13. Yüksel E, Gülkaç MD. The Cyto