KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2015 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1

Bone marrow stem cells adapt to low-magnitude vibrations by altering their cytoskeleton during quiescence and osteogenesis

Levent DEMİRAY
Engin ÖZÇİVİCİ
Sayfa
88–97
Yayın Tarihi
2015-03-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These results show that bone marrow stem cells demonstrate similar cytoskeletal adaptations to low-magnitude high-frequency mechanical loads both during quiescence and osteogenesis, potentially becoming more sensitive to additional loads by increased structural stiffness.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Application of mechanical vibrations is anabolic to bone tissue, not only by guiding mature bone cells to increased formation, but also by increasing the osteogenic commitment of progenitor cells.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, we subjected mouse bone marrow stem cell line D1-ORL-UVA to daily mechanical vibrations (0.15 g, 90 Hz, 15 min/day) for 7 days, both during quiescence and osteogenic commitment, to identify corresponding ultrastructural adaptations on cellular and molecular levels.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These results show that bone marrow stem cells demonstrate similar cytoskeletal adaptations to low-magnitude high-frequency mechanical loads both during quiescence and osteogenesis, potentially becoming more sensitive to additional loads by increased structural stiffness.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Mesenchymal stem cells · vibrations · in vitro cell culture

Özet

Application of mechanical vibrations is anabolic to bone tissue, not only by guiding mature bone cells to increased formation, but also by increasing the osteogenic commitment of progenitor cells. However, the sensitivity and adaptive response of bone marrow stem cells to this loading regimen has not yet been identified. In this study, we subjected mouse bone marrow stem cell line D1-ORL-UVA to daily mechanical vibrations (0.15 g, 90 Hz, 15 min/day) for 7 days, both during quiescence and osteogenic commitment, to identify corresponding ultrastructural adaptations on cellular and molecular levels. During quiescence, mechanical vibrations significantly increased total actin content and actin fiber thickness, as measured by phalloidin staining and fluorescent microscopy. Cellular height also increased, as measured by atomic force microscopy, along with the expression of focal adhesion kinase (PTK2) mRNA levels. During osteogenesis, mechanical vibrations increased the total actin content, actin fiber thickness, and cytoplasmic membrane roughness, with significant increase in Runx2 mRNA levels. These results show that bone marrow stem cells demonstrate similar cytoskeletal adaptations to low-magnitude high-frequency mechanical loads both during quiescence and osteogenesis, potentially becoming more sensitive to additional loads by increased structural stiffness.

Abstract

Application of mechanical vibrations is anabolic to bone tissue, not only by guiding mature bone cells to increased formation, but also by increasing the osteogenic commitment of progenitor cells. However, the sensitivity and adaptive response of bone marrow stem cells to this loading regimen has not yet been identified. In this study, we subjected mouse bone marrow stem cell line D1-ORL-UVA to daily mechanical vibrations (0.15 g, 90 Hz, 15 min/day) for 7 days, both during quiescence and osteogenic commitment, to identify corresponding ultrastructural adaptations on cellular and molecular levels. During quiescence, mechanical vibrations significantly increased total actin content and actin fiber thickness, as measured by phalloidin staining and fluorescent microscopy. Cellular height also increased, as measured by atomic force microscopy, along with the expression of focal adhesion kinase (PTK2) mRNA levels. During osteogenesis, mechanical vibrations increased the total actin content, actin fiber thickness, and cytoplasmic membrane roughness, with significant increase in Runx2 mRNA levels. These results show that bone marrow stem cells demonstrate similar cytoskeletal adaptations to low-magnitude high-frequency mechanical loads both during quiescence and osteogenesis, potentially becoming more sensitive to additional loads by increased structural stiffness.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEMİRAY, L., ÖZÇİVİCİ, E. (2015). Bone marrow stem cells adapt to low-magnitude vibrations by altering their cytoskeleton during quiescence and osteogenesis. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1, 88–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/181548

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Batra NN, Li YJ, Yellowley CE, You L, Malone AM, Kim CH, Jacobs CR (2005). Effects of short-term recovery periods on fluid-in- duced signaling in osteoblastic cells. J Biomech 38: 1909–1917.
  2. Bush JL, Wilson JB, Vail TP (2006). Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452: 186–192.
  3. Chen QA, Xiao P, Chen JN, Cai JY, Cai XF, Ding H, Pan YL (2010). AFM studies of cellular mechanics during osteogenic differen- tiation of human amniotic fluid-derived stem cells. Anal Sci 26: 1033–1037.
  4. Coughlin TR, Niebur GL (2012). Fluid shear stress in trabecular bone marrow due to low-magnitude high-frequency vibration. J Biomech 45: 2222–2229.
  5. Cristofolini L (1997). A critical analysis of stress shielding evaluation of hip prostheses. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 25: 409–483.
  6. Dahl KN, Booth-Gauthier EA, Ladoux B (2010). In the middle of it all: mutual mechanical regulation between the nucleus and the cytoskeleton. J Biomech 43: 2–8.
  7. Darling EM, Topel M, Zauscher S, Vail TP, Guilak F (2008). Visco- elastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. J Bio- mech 41: 454–464.
  8. Dickerson DA, Sander EA, Nauman EA (2008). Modeling the me- chanical consequences of vibratory loading in the vertebral body: microscale effects. Biomech Model Mechan 7: 191–202.
  9. Garman R, Gaudette G, Donahue LR, Rubin C, Judex S (2007a). Low-level accelerations applied in the absence of weight bear- ing can enhance trabecular bone formation. J Orthop Res 25: 732–740.
  10. Garman R, Rubin C, Judex S (2007b). Small oscillatory accelerations, independent of matrix deformations, increase osteoblast activ- ity and enhance bone morphology. PLoS ONE 2: e653. Gilsanz V, Wren TA, Sanchez M, Dorey F, Judex S, Rubin C (2006). Low-level, high-frequency mechanical signals enhance muscu- loskeletal development of young women with low BMD. J Bone Miner Res 21: 1464–1474.
  11. Hu S, Chen J, Butler JP, Wang N (2005). Prestress mediates force propagation into the nucleus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 329: 423–428.
  12. Hu S, Wang N (2006). Control of stress propagation in the cytoplasm by prestress and loading frequency. Mol Cell Biomech 3: 49–60.
  13. Ingber DE (1997). Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. Annu Rev Physiol 59: 575–599. Ingber DE (2003a). Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotrans- duction. Ann Med 35: 564–577. Ingber DE (2003b). Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical sys- tems biology. J Cell