KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Identification of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Genotypes Tolerant to Water Stres

Ali Beyhan UÇAK
Sayfa
312–322
Yayın Tarihi
2018-09-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The P64LE119 genotype with optimum water use efficiency and prominent with crop water stress index and chlorophyll content both in no water-stress and strong water stress treatments was identified as water stress-resistant and the genotype was considered to have reliable characteristics potentially to be used in further water stress-resistance studies.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The present research was carried out to determine water-stress tolerance of linoleic sunflower genotypes (P64LE119, PR63F73, P64LL62) grown under different water stress conditions [no water-stress (I100); mild water-stress (I70); strong water-stress (I35)] in the years 2015 and 2016.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Variance analyses revealed significant differences between the genotypes (P<0.01).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The P64LE119 genotype with optimum water use efficiency and prominent with crop water stress index and chlorophyll content both in no water-stress and strong water stress treatments was identified as water stress-resistant and the genotype was considered to have reliable characteristics potentially to be used in further water stress-resistance studies.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Sunflower · Water stress · Crop water stress index

Abstract

The present research was carried out to determine water-stress tolerance of linoleic sunflower genotypes (P64LE119, PR63F73, P64LL62) grown under different water stress conditions [no water-stress (I100); mild water-stress (I70); strong water-stress (I35)] in the years 2015 and 2016. Variance analyses revealed significant differences between the genotypes (P<0.01). As the average of two years, the greatest yield was obtained from no water-stress x genotype interaction (I100xP64LE119) with 4094.66 kg ha-1, the lowest yield was obtained from strong water stress x genotype interaction (I35xPR63F73) with 2487.81 kg ha-1. Again as the average of two years, the greatest chlorophyll content was obtained from no water-stress x genotype interaction (I100xP64LE119) with 49.83 spad, the lowest value was obtained from strong water stress x genotype interaction (I35xPR63F73) with 34.39 spad. The greatest crop water stress index was obtained from strong water stress x genotype interaction (I35xPR63F73) with 0.53, the lowest value was obtained from no water-stress x genotype interaction (I100xP64LE119) with 0.21. The P64LE119 genotype with optimum water use efficiency and prominent with crop water stress index and chlorophyll content both in no water-stress and strong water stress treatments was identified as water stress-resistant and the genotype was considered to have reliable characteristics potentially to be used in further water stress-resistance studies.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UÇAK, A. B. (2018). Identification of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Genotypes Tolerant to Water Stres. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 312–322. https://ajindex.com/articles/178603

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Afkari A (2010). The effect of water deficit on characteristics physiological-chemical of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) varieties. Advances in Environmental Biology 4(1): 24-30
  2. Alahdadi I, Oraki H & Khajani F P (2011). Effect of water stress on yield and yield components of sunflower genotypes. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(34): 6504-6509 Alderfasi A A & Nielsen D C (2001). Use of crop water stress index for monitoring water status and scheduling irrigation in wheat. Agriculture Water Management 47: 69-75 Ali M D & Shui L T (2009). Potential evapotranspiration model for Muda Irrigation Project, Malaysia. Water Resources Management 23(1): 57-69 Blake G R & Hartge K H (1986). Bulk density. In: Klute, A. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Part 1. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, Monograph 9, pp. 363-375
  3. Chaves M M (1991). Effect of water deficits on carbon assimilation. Journal of Experimental Botany 42(1): 1-16
  4. Chimenti C, Pearson A & Hall J (2002). Osmotic adjustment and yield maintenance under drought in sunflower. Field Crops Research 75(2): 235-246 Choudhury B J & Idso S B (1984). Simulating sunflower canopy temperatures to infer root-zone soil water potential. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 31: 69-78
  5. Cornic G (2000). Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture-not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends in Plant Science 5(5): 187-188
  6. Darvishzadeh R, Azizi M, Hatami-Maleki H, Bernousi I, Abdollahi Mandoulakani B, Jafari M & Sarrafi A (2010). Molecular characterization and similarity relationships among sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) inbred lines using some mapped simple sequence repeats. African Journal of Biotechnology 9(43): 7280-7288 Demirtas M & Kirnak H (2009). Farklı sulama yöntemleri ve aralıklarının fizyolojik parametrelere etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 19: 79-83 Der G & Everitt B S (2002). A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using SAS. Second Edition. CRC Press LLC, 2000
  7. N.W. Corporate Blvd., Boca Raton, Florida 3431. USA Flexas J & Medrano H (2002). Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: Stomatal non-stomatal limitations revisited. Annals of Botany 89(2): 183-189 Gencoglan C & Yazar A (1999). Çukurova koşullarında yetiştirilen I. ürün mısır bitkisinde infrared termometre değerlerinden yararlanılarak bitki su stresi indeksi (CWSI) ve sulama zamanının belirlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 23: 87-9