Dergiler / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Assessment of Soil Quality Index for Tea Cultivated Soils in Ortaçay Micro Catchment in Black Sea Region

Sayfa
42–53
Yayın Tarihi
2020-03-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results indicated that 25% of the soil samples studied had weak quality level, whereas 75% were in moderate SQIw class in terms of tea requirements of the soil quality.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The objective of this research was to determine soil quality by taking into consideration the integrated Soil Quality Index (SQIw) model on tea plantations located in Ortaçay Micro Catchment of Rize.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 22 soil quality indicators were included in the SQIw model by grouping into 4 criteria which are; i-soil physical properties, ii- soil chemical properties, iii-macronutrient elements, iv- micronutrient elements.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results indicated that 25% of the soil samples studied had weak quality level, whereas 75% were in moderate SQIw class in terms of tea requirements of the soil quality.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Soil quality index · Analytical Hierarchy Process · Tea plant

Abstract

The objective of this research was to determine soil quality by taking into consideration the integrated Soil Quality Index (SQIw) model on tea plantations located in Ortaçay Micro Catchment of Rize. In the SQIw model, soil indicators were weighted by means of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Various indicator units were normalized by a Standard Scoring Function. A total of 22 soil quality indicators were included in the SQIw model by grouping into 4 criteria which are; i-soil physical properties, ii- soil chemical properties, iii-macronutrient elements, iv- micronutrient elements. Twenty eight soil samples were collected from tea cultivated gardens including dominantly Leptosol and Alisol-Acrisol great soil groups based on FAO/WRB classification. The results indicated that 25% of the soil samples studied had weak quality level, whereas 75% were in moderate SQIw class in terms of tea requirements of the soil quality.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DENGİZ, O., İÇ, S., SAYGIN, F., İMAMOĞLU, A. (2020). Assessment of Soil Quality Index for Tea Cultivated Soils in Ortaçay Micro Catchment in Black Sea Region. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 42–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/178400

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Andrews SS, Karlen DL & Mitchell JP (2002) A comparison of soil quality indices methods for vegetable production system in northern California. Agric Ecosyst Environ 90: 25–45.Bhushan N & Rai K (2004) Strategic Decision Making: Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 172.Bouyoucos GJ (1951) A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal, 43: 435-438
  2. Bouyoucos GJ (1935) The clay ratio as a criterion of soils to erosion. Journal of the Am Soc Agron 27: 738-751.Da Silva AF, Barbosa A P, Zimback CRL, Landim PMB & Soares A (2015) Estimation of croplands using indicator kriging and fuzzy classification. Comput Electron Agric. 111: 1–11.Dengiz O, MA Özyazıcı & Sağlam M (2015) Multi-Criteria Assessment And Geostatistical Approach For Determination of Rice Growing Suitability Sites in Gokirmak Catchment. Paddy Water Environment, 13: 1–10. DOI 10.1007/s10333-013-0400-4.FAO (2009) FAOSTAT-Tea Production 2009; FAO: Rome, Italy.Doran JW & Parkin BT (1994) Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran, J.W., Coleman, D.C., Bezdicek, D.F., Stewart, B.A. (Eds.), Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. SSSA Inc., Madison, WI, USA, pp. 3–21 (SSSA Special Publication No. 35).Jiuquan Z, Su Y, Wu J, & Liang H (2015) GIS based land suitability assessment for tobacco production using AHP and fuzzy set in Shandong province of China. Comput Electron Agric 114: 202–211.Kacar B (1984) Çayın gübrelenmesi. Çay İşletmeleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Çay–Kur Yayını No: 4, Ankara, p. 356.Kacar B (1994) Chemical Analysis of Soil and Plant (III). pp. 229-233, Ankara Kemper WD & Rosenau RC (1986) Aggregate stability and size distribution. Editor: Klute, A Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I-Physical and Mineralocigal Methods, 2nd ed., SSSA Book Series No: 5, SSA and ASA, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 425-442.Lal R, & Elliot W (1994) Erodibility and erosivity. In R. Lal (Ed.), Soil Erosion Research Methods (2nd ed., pp. 181– 210). Delray Beach: St. Lucie Press.Lindsay WL & Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 42: 421–428.Liebig MA, Varvel GE & Doran JW (2001) A simple performance-based index forassessing multiple agroecosystem functions. Agron J 93: 313–318.Karlen DL, SS Andrews & Doran JW (2001). Soil quality: Current concepts and applications. Advances in Agronomy 74: 1–40.Mallants D, Mohanty BP, Jacques D & Feyen J (1996) Spatial variabilit