Dergiler / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Members’ Willingness to Invest Capital in the Agricultural Producer Unions: A Case of Samsun Province in Turkey

Sayfa
12–21
Yayın Tarihi
2020-03-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In order to increase members’ willingness to invest capital to their unions, members’ trusts and participations in the training activities and administration of the unions should be increased.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The research aimed to reveal the members’ willingness to invest capital in the Agricultural Producer Union (APU) and the factors influencing their decisions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The main data of the study obtained through the surveys from 420 members of the APU.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In order to increase members’ willingness to invest capital to their unions, members’ trusts and participations in the training activities and administration of the unions should be increased.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Willingness to invest capital · Agricultural producer union · Random effects Tobit model

Abstract

The research aimed to reveal the members’ willingness to invest capital in the Agricultural Producer Union (APU) and the factors influencing their decisions. The main data of the study obtained through the surveys from 420 members of the APU. Members’ willingness to invest capital in their unions and effective factors were determined using the Contingent Valuation Method and the Random Effects Tobit model, respectively. The research revealed that 44% of the union members were willing to make an average contribution of 355 TL to their unions. Random Effects Tobit model results revealed that member's trust, membership fee, participation in trainings, memberships of livestock union, apple and beekeeping, export crops through the union, attending the general assembly, level of education and agricultural experience positively affected the willingness to invest capital, while membership of the organic hazelnut and vegetables union, gender, management experience, age and total income negative affected the willingness to invest capital. In order to increase members’ willingness to invest capital to their unions, members’ trusts and participations in the training activities and administration of the unions should be increased.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TOPUZ, B. K. (2020). Members’ Willingness to Invest Capital in the Agricultural Producer Unions: A Case of Samsun Province in Turkey. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 12–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/178361

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Anastasopoulos P C & Mannering F L (2009). A note on modeling vehicle accident frequencies with random-parameters count models. Accident Analysis & Prevention 41(1): 153– 159 Garrod G & Willis K G (1990). Contingent valuation techniques: a review of their unbiasedness, efficiency and consistency. Countryside Change Initiative Working Paper 10. Newcastle: University of Newcastle upon Tyne Greene W (2012).
  2. Limdep, Version 10.0. Econometric Software, Inc., Plainview, NY GTB (2012). Gümrük ve Ticaret Bakanlığı Kooperatifçilik Genel Müdürlüğü, Türkiye Kooperatifçilik stratejisi ve Eylem Planı 2012-2016,
  3. Ankara GTHB (2013).
  4. Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı 2013-2017
  5. Stratejik Planı, Ankara Hansen M, Morrow J & Batista J C (2002). The impact of trust on cooperative membership retention, performance and satisfaction: an exploratory study. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 5(1): 41-59
  6. IRFO (2008). Çiftçi Örgütlerinin Kurumsal Güçlendirilmesi Projesi, Uygulama ve Tamamlama Raporu, Türkiye Ormancılık Kooperatifleri Merkez Birliği Karlı B & Çelik Y (2003). GAP alanındaki tarım kooperatifleri ve diğer çiftçi örgütlerinin bölge kalkınmasındaki etkinliği. Tarımsal Ekonomi Araştırma Enstitüsü, Yayın No: 97, ISBN: 975-407-122-5 Karantinis K & Zago A M (2001). Endogenous membership in mixed duopsonies. American Journal of Agricultural Economic 83(5): 1266–1272
  7. Kaygusuzoğlu M (2002). Ekonomik Krizden Çıkışta Kooperatifçilik, Karınca Kooperatif Postası, Türk Kooperatifçilik Kurumu, Ankara Kılıç B (2011). Samsun ilindeki tarımsal kalkınma kooperatiflerinde ortak-kooperatif ilişkilerinin analizi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Samsun Kılıç Topuz B (2017). Samsun ili tarımsal üretici birliklerinde güven ve performansa etkili faktörler. Doktora tezi, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü (Basılmamış), Samsun Kılıç Topuz B, Bozoğlu M & Başer U (2017). Güncel gelişmeler kapsamında Türkiye’deki çiftçi örgütlerine yönelik mevzuatın değerlendirilmesi. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 52(Özel sayı): 140-161
  8. Kovacic D, Juracak J & Zutinic D (2000). Willingness of farmers to cooperate field study results in the Zagreb rural area. Portal Znanstventh Casopisa Republike Hrvatskb 6(56): 1119-1129 Lord D & Mannering F (2010). The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Transportation Research Part A: Policy Practice 44(5): 291–305 Mitchell R C &