KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2010 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4

An evaluation of the distribution pattern of the common chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs) in Turkey

Utku PERKTAŞ
Zafer AYAŞ
Sayfa
443–452
Yayın Tarihi
2010-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Our findings show that the presence of this species is more likely in zones with high summer precipitation, which is probably associated with primary productivity and the habitats favored by this species.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The common chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs) is one of the most common and widespread of the Western Palearctic songbirds and breeds primarily in natural forests in the northern, western, and southwestern parts of Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We reevaluated the distribution of this species in Turkey with recent observational data.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Our findings show that the presence of this species is more likely in zones with high summer precipitation, which is probably associated with primary productivity and the habitats favored by this species.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Key words: Common chaffinch · distribution · climate

Özet

The common chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs) is one of the most common and widespread of the Western Palearctic songbirds and breeds primarily in natural forests in the northern, western, and southwestern parts of Turkey. We reevaluated the distribution of this species in Turkey with recent observational data. Although this species has been considered a breeder in southeastern Turkey, results of this study suggest that it probably does not breed in the region any longer. We examined the effect of climatic (temperature, precipitation, potential evapotranspiration) and topographic (altitude) variables on common chaffinch distribution in Turkey. Our findings show that the presence of this species is more likely in zones with high summer precipitation, which is probably associated with primary productivity and the habitats favored by this species.

Abstract

The common chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs) is one of the most common and widespread of the Western Palearctic songbirds and breeds primarily in natural forests in the northern, western, and southwestern parts of Turkey. We reevaluated the distribution of this species in Turkey with recent observational data. Although this species has been considered a breeder in southeastern Turkey, results of this study suggest that it probably does not breed in the region any longer. We examined the effect of climatic (temperature, precipitation, potential evapotranspiration) and topographic (altitude) variables on common chaffinch distribution in Turkey. Our findings show that the presence of this species is more likely in zones with high summer precipitation, which is probably associated with primary productivity and the habitats favored by this species.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

PERKTAŞ, U., AYAŞ, Z. (2010). An evaluation of the distribution pattern of the common chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4, 443–452. https://ajindex.com/articles/177678

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Albayrak, A.B. 2002.
  2. Studies on the avifauna of Balıkdamı, Sivrihisar (Eskişehir). MSc thesis. Hacettepe University, Ankara, 124pp. Andrewartha, H.G. and Birch L.C. 1954. The Distribution and Abundance of Animals. The University of Chicago Press,
  3. Chicago, Illinois. Beaman, M. 1978. Bird Report No. 4, 1974-1975.
  4. Ornithological Society of Turkey, England. Bibby, C.J., Hill, D.A., Burgess, N.D. and Mustoe, S. 2000. Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press,
  5. U.K. Carrascal, L.M. and Diaz, L. 2006. Winter bird distribution in abiotic and habitat structural gradients: A case study with Mediterranean montane oakwoods. Ecoscience 13: 100-110.
  6. Canterbury, G. 2002. Metabolic adaptation and climatic constrains on winter bird distribution. Ecology 83: 946-957.
  7. Cramp, S., Perrins, C.M. and Brooks, D. 1994.
  8. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, V. 8. Oxford University Press,
  9. U.K. Cuento V.R. and de Casenave, J.L. 1999. Determinants of bird species richness: role of climate and vegetation structure at a regional scale. J. Biogeogr 26: 487-492.
  10. Dyrcz, A. and Halupka, L. 2008. The response of the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus to climate change. J. Ornithol. DOI 10.1007/s10336-008-0315-9.
  11. Evans, K., Warren, P. and Gaston, K. 2005. Species–energy relationships at the macroecological scale: a review of the mechanisms. Biol. Rev. 80: 1-25.
  12. Furness, R.W. and Greenwood, J.J.D. 1993. Birds as Monitors of Environmental Change. London, Chapman & Hall. Githaiga-Mwicigi, J.M.W., Fairbanks, D.H. and Midgley, G. 2002. Hierarchical processes define spatial pattern of avian assemblages restricted and endemic to the arid Karoo, South Africa. J. Biogeogr. 29: 1067-1087.
  13. Hawkins, B.A., Field, R., Cornell, H.V., Curie, D.J., Guegan, J.F., Kaufman, D.M., Kerr, J.T., Mittelbach, G.G., Oberdorff, T., O’Brien, E.M., Porter, E.E. and Turner, J.R.G. 2001. Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology 84: 3105-3117.
  14. Herrera, C.M. 1978. On the breeding distribution pattern of European migrant birds: MacArthur’s theme reexamined. Auk 95: 496- 509. Huertas, D. and Diaz, J.A. 2001. Winter habitat selection by a montane bird assemblage: the effects of solar radiation. Can. J. Zool. 79: 279-284.
  15. Huntley, B., Green R.E., Collingham, Y.C. and Willis, S.G. 2007. A climatic atlas of European breeding birds. Durham University, The RSBP and Lynx Editions, Barcelona. Kirwan, G.M., Martins, R.P., Eken, G. and Davidson, P. 1998. A Checklist of the Birds of Turkey. Sand