Dergiler / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 4

Is there any Relationship between Proximal Femur Fracture Site and Hip Anatomy?

Sayfa
363–366
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

An advantage of our work is that this study can be used to design an implant.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: There are few studies reporting the relationship between hip fracture site and hip geometry and bone mineral density in the literature.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Between 2015-2018, patients who applied to the hospital with femur fracture were listed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:An advantage of our work is that this study can be used to design an implant.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015-2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Introduction: There are few studies reporting the relationship between hip fracture site and hip geometry and bone mineral density in the literature. The forces affecting the hip joint, the arm of the force and the angle of the load are the basis of hip biomechanical studies. The angle of the proximal femur and the morphological parameters are important for stress distribution due to the response to the burden. We think that the morphological differences of the proximal femur are related to the fracture type. Methods: Between 2015-2018, patients who applied to the hospital with femur fracture were listed. One thousand twentyfour femur fractures were detected. Pertrochanteric, femoral neck and subtrochanteric fractures were selected on the list. Patients with appropriate pelvis X-rays were identified. Intertrochanteric distance, femoral neck length, femoral neck width, lateral offset length, neck- shaft angle and acetabulum center-edge angle were measured by one orthopedic surgeon. Results: Significant statistical results were found between collum femoris fractures and collodiafizer angles of subtrochanteric fractures (p=0.0117). Significant statistical results were also observed between pertrochanteric fractures and subtrochanteric fractures (p=0.0439). Comparing with the subtrochanteric group and the femoral neck group’ CE angles, a significant difference was found (p=0.0490). There was no statistically significant difference between pertrocanteric group and subtrochanteric group (p=0.2614). Discussion and Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first morphological femur fracture study that was conducted for Turkish society in the literature. An advantage of our work is that this study can be used to design an implant.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BATIBAY, S. G., ÇAMUR, S. (2019). Is there any Relationship between Proximal Femur Fracture Site and Hip Anatomy?. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 4, 363–366. https://ajindex.com/articles/175548

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Suckel AA, Dietz K, Wuelker N, Helwig P. Evaluation of complications of three different types of proximal extra-articular femur fractures: differences in complications, age, sex and surviving rates. Int Orthop 2007;31:689–95. [CrossRef ] 2. Faulkner KG, Cummings SR, Black D, Palermo L, Glüer CC, Genant HK. Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1211–7. [CrossRef ] 3. Pulkkinen P, Partanen J, Jalovaara P, Jamsa T. Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:274–80 4. Rafferty KL. Structural design of the femoral neck in primates. J Hum Evol 1998;34:361–83. [CrossRef ] 5. Greenspan SL, Myers ER, Maitland LA, Kido TH, Krasnow MB, Hayes WC. Trochanteric bone mineral density is associated with type of hip fracture in the elderly. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1889–94 [CrossRef ] 6. Yamauchi K, Naofumi M, Sumida H, Fukuta S, Hori H. Comparison of morphological features in the femur between femoral neck fractures and femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Surg Radiol Anat 2016;38:775–80. [CrossRef ] 7. Gnudi S, Ripamonti C, Lisi L, Fini M, Giardino R, Giavaresi G. Proximal femur geometry to detect and distinguish femoral neck fractures from trochanteric fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2002;13:69–73. [CrossRef ] 8. Partanen J, Jamsa T, Jalovaara P. Influence of the upper femur and pelvic geometry on the risk and type of hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2001;16:1540–6. [CrossRef ] 9. Gómez Alonso C, Díaz Curiel M, Hawkins Carranza F, Pérez Cano R, Díez Pérez A; Multicenter Project for Research in Osteoporosis. Femoral Bone Mineral Density, Neck-Shaft Angle and Mean Femoral Neck Width as Predictors of Hip Fracture in Men and Women. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:714–20. [CrossRef ] 10. Michelotti J, Clark J. Femoral neck length and hip fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 1999;14:1714–20. [CrossRef ] 11. Pietak A, Ma S, Beck CW, Stringer MD. Fundamental ratios and logarithmic periodicity in human limb bones. J Anat 2013;222:526–37. [CrossRef ]