KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5

Contribution and acclimatization of the swarming tropical copepod Dioithona oculata (Farran, 1913) in a Mediterranean coastal ecosystem

Tuba TERBIYIK KURT
Sayfa
567–577
Yayın Tarihi
2018-09-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition, the presence of copepodits in the population suggests that this species was established and successfully acclimatized to the conditions, becoming an important component of the zooplankton community in the İskenderun Bay ecosystem.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, tropical oithonid copepod Dioithona oculata was recorded for the first time in the Mediterranean Sea.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study was conducted seasonally in the coastal area of İskenderun Bay between April 2013 and December 2016.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition, the presence of copepodits in the population suggests that this species was established and successfully acclimatized to the conditions, becoming an important component of the zooplankton community in the İskenderun Bay ecosystem.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:alien species · Dioithona oculata · İskenderun Bay

Abstract

In this study, tropical oithonid copepod Dioithona oculata was recorded for the first time in the Mediterranean Sea. This species is distinguished easily by its large ocular lenses and by the number of setae on the endopod of the maxillule. The study was conducted seasonally in the coastal area of İskenderun Bay between April 2013 and December 2016. D. oculata was first observed in October 2013 in the study area (Station 4; 3.1 ind. m−3−3^{-3})); after this period, this species became an important contributor to zooplankton assemblages in October with the highest level seen in 2016 (Station 4, 834.5 ind. m−3−3^{-3}). The proportion of this species in the copepod community varied from 0.14% (2014) to 29.4% (2016), and the highest proportions, observed in October 2016, were at Stations 3 and 4 (51.1% and 65.3%, respectively). Females dominated the D. oculata population and the ratio of female to male was 5.6 ± 7 on average. Copepodit stages were also observed in the population. Altogether, these data indicate that the D. oculata population increased year after year. In addition, the presence of copepodits in the population suggests that this species was established and successfully acclimatized to the conditions, becoming an important component of the zooplankton community in the İskenderun Bay ecosystem.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KURT, T. T. (2018). Contribution and acclimatization of the swarming tropical copepod Dioithona oculata (Farran, 1913) in a Mediterranean coastal ecosystem. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5, 567–577. https://ajindex.com/articles/174953

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Ambler JW, Ferrari FD, Fornshell JA (1991). Population structure and swarm formation of the cyclopoid copepod Dioithona oculata near mangrove cays. J Plankton Res 13: 1257-1272.
  2. Andersen V, Gubanova A, Nival P, Ruellet T (2001). Zooplankton community during the transition from spring bloom to oligotrophy in the open NW Mediterranean and effects of wind events. 2. Vertical distributions and migrations. J Plankton Res 23: 243-261.
  3. Ara M, Farooq S, Rabbaniha M, Ali Muhammad A (2017). First report of cyclopoid copepods (Oithonidae) from northeastern Arabian Sea, Karachi, Pakistan. Iran J Fish Sci 16: 1114-1122.
  4. Araujo AV, Dias CO, Bonecker SL (2017). Differences in the structure of copepod assemblages in four tropical estuaries: importance of pollution and the estuary hydrodynamics. Mar Pollut Bull 115: 412-420.
  5. Avşar D (1999). Physico-chemical characteristics of the eastern Mediterranean in relation to distribution of the new Scyphomedusae (Rhopilema nomadica). Turk J Zool 23: 605- 616. Björnberg TKS (1963). On the marine free-living copepods off Brazil. Bol Inst Oceanogr 13: 103-142.
  6. Bradford-Grieve JM, Markhaseva EL, Rocha CEF, Abiahy B (1999). Copepoda. In: Boltovskoy D, editor. South Atlantic Zooplankton. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers, pp. 869-1098.
  7. Castro LR, Claramunt G, González HE, Krautz MC, Llanos Rivera A, Méndez J, Schneide W, Scoto S (2010). Fatty acids in eggs of anchoveta Engraulis ringens during two contrasting winter spawning seasons. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 420: 193-205.
  8. Çevik C, Erkol IL, Toklu B (2006). A new record of an alien jellyfish from the Levantine coast of Turkey, Cassiopea andromeda (Forsskål, 1775) [Cnidaria: Scyphozoa: Rhizostomea]. Aquat Invasions 1: 196-197.
  9. Çeviker D, Albayrak S (2006). Three alien molluscs from İskenderun Bay (SE Turkey). Aquat Invasions 1: 76-79.
  10. Dakin WJ, Colefax A (1933). The marine plankton of the coastal waters of New South Wales. I. The chief planktonic forms and their seasonal distribution. Proc Linn Soc New South Wales 58: 186-222.
  11. Emery AR (1968). Preliminary observations on coral reef plankton. Limnol Oceanogr 13: 293-303.
  12. Farran GP (1913).
  13. Plankton from Christmas Island, Indian Ocean. II. On Copepoda of the genera Oithona and Paroithona. Proc Zool Soc Lond 1913: 181-193.
  14. Fernandez de Puelles M, Grás D, Hernández‐León S (2003). Annual cycle of zooplankton biomass, abundance and species composition in the neritic area of the Balearic Sea, Western Mediterranean. PSZN Mar Ecol 24: 123-139. G