Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 1975 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

Single anterior portal: A better option for arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability?

Sayfa
298–302
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The single portal technique has advantages such as less postoperative pain, a shorter surgical learning curve and lower costs.Level of Evidence: Level III, Therapeutic study.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare single and double anterior portal techniques in thearthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability.Methods: A total of 91 cases who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instabilitywere reviewed.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The patients were divided into 2 groups as Group 1 (47 male and 2 female; mean age:25.8± 6.8) for arthroscopic single anterior portal approach and Group 2 (41 male and 1 female; meanage: 25.4± 6.6) for the classical anterior double portal approach.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The single portal technique has advantages such as less postoperative pain, a shorter surgical learning curve and lower costs.Level of Evidence: Level III, Therapeutic study.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare single and double anterior portal techniques in thearthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability.Methods: A total of 91 cases who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instabilitywere reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups as Group 1 (47 male and 2 female; mean age:25.8± 6.8) for arthroscopic single anterior portal approach and Group 2 (41 male and 1 female; meanage: 25.4± 6.6) for the classical anterior double portal approach. The groups were compared for clinicalscores, range of motion, analgesia requirement, complications, duration of surgery, cost and learningcurve according to a short questionnaire completed by the relevant healthcare professionals.Results: No statistically signiŞcant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of pre-operativeand post-operative Constant and Rowe Shoulder Scores, range of motion and complications (p> 0.05). InGroup 2 patients, the requirement for post-operative analgesics was signiŞcantly higher (p < 0.001),whereas the duration of surgery was statistically signiŞcantly shorter in Group 1 (p < 0.001). In theassessment of the questionnaire, it was seen that a single portal anterior approach was preferred at ahigher ratio (p¼ 0.035). The cost analysis revealed that the cost was 5.7% less for patients with a singleportal.Conclusion: In the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability accompanied by aBankart lesion, the anterior single portal technique is as successful in terms of clinical results as theconventional double portal approach. The single portal technique has advantages such as less postoperative pain, a shorter surgical learning curve and lower costs.Level of Evidence: Level III, Therapeutic study.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇİÇEK, H., TUHANİOĞLU, Ü., OĞUR, H. U., SEYFETTİNOĞLU, F., ÇİLOĞLU, O., BEYZADEOĞLU, T. B. (1975). Single anterior portal: A better option for arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability?. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 298–302. https://ajindex.com/articles/167596

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Dodson CC, Cordasco FA. Anterior glenohumeral joint dislocations. Orthop ClinNorth Am. 2008;39:507e518.
  2. Hovelius L, Augustini BG, Fredin H, Johansson O, Norlin R, Thorling J. Primaryanterior dislocation of the shoulder in young patients. A ten-year prospectivestudy. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1996;78:1677e1684
  3. Taylor DC, Arciero RA. Pathologic changes associated with shoulder dislocations. Arthroscopic and physical examination findings in first-time, traumatic anterior dislocations. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:306e311. PMID: 9167808,
  4. Norlin R. Intraarticular pathology in acute, first-time anterior shoulder dislocation:anarthroscopic study. Arthroscopy. 1993;9:546e549. PMID: 7818617
  5. Liavaag S, Brox JI, Pripp AH, Enger M, Soldal LA, Svenningsen S. Immobilizationin external rotation after primary shoulder dislocation did not reduce the riskof recurrence: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2011;93:. 897e904. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00416. Epub 2011 Apr 15 6. Matsui Y, Omachi T. New secure relay technique for arthroscopic Bankart repair without making an additional working portal. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(1):113e118. PMID: 15650677,
  6. Armangil M, Basat HÇ, Akan B, Karaduman M, Demirtas¸ M. Arthroscopic stabilization of anterior shoulder instability using a single anterior portal. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(1):6e12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3944/ AOTT.2015.14.0035
  7. Steinbeck J, Jerosch J. Arthroscopic transglenoid stabilization versus open anchor suturing in traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:373e378. PMID: 9617398,
  8. Angelo RL. Controversies in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: arthroscopic versusopen Bankart repair, thermal treatment of capsular tissue, acromioplasties-arethey necessary? Arthroscopy. 2003;19(Suppl 1):224e228. PMID: 14673442,
  9. Nelson BJ, Arciero RA. Arthroscopic management of glenohumeral instability.Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:602e614. PMID: 10921658,
  10. Fabbriciani C, Milano G, Demontis A, Fadda S, Ziranu F, Mulas PD. Arthroscopic versus open treatment of Bankart lesion of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:456e462. PMID: 15122134, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.art