Dergiler / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 4

The effectiveness of topical scar-reducing therapies administered for scarring due to burns and other causes: A retrospective pilot clinical research

Sayfa
139–144
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Hasan Mete Aksoy,1 Berna Aksoy,2 Aslı Tatlıparmak,2 Emel Çalıkoğlu3

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aims: Multiple modalities are used to treat scarring; however, data on the efficacy of the topical scar-reducing treatments most frequently used by patients is insufficient.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: The study included 71 patients with a median scar age of 18 days at the time treatment was initiated.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Hasan Mete Aksoy,1 Berna Aksoy,2 Aslı Tatlıparmak,2 Emel Çalıkoğlu3
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Aims: Multiple modalities are used to treat scarring; however, data on the efficacy of the topical scar-reducing treatments most frequently used by patients is insufficient. This study aimed to retrospectively determine the effectiveness of topical scar-reducing treatments and patients’ compliance. Methods: The medical records of patients adimitted for the treatment of scarring were retrospectively evaluated. Patient satisfaction with the treatment was assessed via telephone interviews. Each patient also sent recent photographs of their scars. Pre- and post-treatment photographs were scored according to the Manchester Scar Scale, and in terms of vascularity and scar surface area (modified MSS ). Results: The study included 71 patients with a median scar age of 18 days at the time treatment was initiated. Mean duration of follow-up was 41 months. The prescribed treatments included onion extract, silicone gel or sheet, and a pressure garment. The patients reported that the treatments were effective, they were satisfied with the treatments, and the treatments were not excessively difficult to apply. MSS and ModMSS scores decreased significantly following treatment. Conclusions: The prescribed topical scar-reducing treatments effectively improved the cosmetic appearance of the patients’ scars and reduced scar-related symptoms. The effectiveness of the topical scar-reducing therapies increased as scar age decreased. Hasan Mete Aksoy,1 Berna Aksoy,2 Aslı Tatlıparmak,2 Emel Çalıkoğlu3

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKSOY, H. M., AKSOY, B., TATLIPARMAK, A., ÇALIKOĞLU, E. (2018). The effectiveness of topical scar-reducing therapies administered for scarring due to burns and other causes: A retrospective pilot clinical research. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 4, 139–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/167575

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Sidgwick GP, McGeorge D, Bayat A. A comprehensive evidence-based review on the role of topicals and dressings in the management of skin scarring. Arch Dermatol Res 2015;307(6):461-477.
  2. Nguyen TA, Feldstein SI, Shumaker PR, Krakowski AC. A review of scar assessment scales. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2015;34(1):28-36.
  3. Beausang E, Floyd H, Dunn KW, Orton CI, Ferguson MW. A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102(6):1954-1961.
  4. Simons M, Tyack Z. Health professionals’ and consumers’ opinion: what is considered important when rating burn scars from photographs? J Burn Care Res 2011;32(2):275-285. van de Kar AL, Corion LU, Smeulders MJ, Draaijers LJ, van der Horst CM, van Zuijlen PP. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116(2):514-522.
  5. Poetschke J, Gauglitz GG. Current options for the treatment of pathological scarring. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2016;14(5):467-477.
  6. Heppt MV, Breuninger H, Reinholz M, Feller-Heppt G, Ruzicka T, Gauglitz GG. Current Strategies in the Treatment of Scars and Keloids. Facial Plast Surg 2015;31(4):386-395.
  7. Monstrey S, Middelkoop E, Vranckx JJ, et al. Updated scar management practical guidelines: non-invasive and invasive measures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014;67(8):1017-1025.
  8. Kim SM, Choi JS, Lee JH, Kim YJ, Jun YJ. Prevention of postsurgical scars: comparsion of efficacy and convenience between silicone gel sheet and topical silicone gel. J Korean Med Sci 2014;29 Suppl 3:249S-2453S. Parry I, Sen S, Palmieri T, Greenhalgh D. Nonsurgical scar management of the face: does early versus late intervention affect outcome? J Burn Care Res 2013;34(5):569-575.
  9. Chanprapaph K, Tanrattanakorn S, Wattanakrai P, Wongkitisophon P, Vachiramon V. Effectiveness of onion extract gel on surgical scars in asians. Dermatol Res Pract 2012;2012:212945. Draelos ZD, Baumann L, Fleischer AB Jr, Plaum S, Avakian EV, Hardas B. A new proprietary onion extract gel improves the appearance of new scars: a randomized, controlled, blinded-investigator study. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2012;5(6):18-24.
  10. Moore KA, Silbernagel B. Reduction of postoperative scar formation with silicone sheeting: 2 case studies. J Am Col Certif Wound Spec 2011;2(3):60-62.
  11. Ho WS, Ying SY, Chan PC, Chan HH. Use of onion extract, heparin, allantoin gel in prevention of scarring in chinese patients having laser removal of tattoos: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Der