Dergiler / Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

Psikososyal ve Anlatısal Kriminolojinin Kesişiminde: Fail Anlatılarında Dil, Bilinçdışı ve Duygulanımlar

At the Intersection of Psychosocial and Narrative Criminology: Language, the Unconscious, and Affect in Offenders’ Narratives

Boran Ali Mercan(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1125-7528
Sayfa
192–213
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu bağlamda, failin bilinçdışı savunma mekanizmasını serimlemek amacıyla anlatısal kriminolojik incelemelerde psikanalitik-çekimli söylem çözümlemesi önerilmektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Tam olarak neyi kastettiğimizi biliriz, ancak kastettiğimiz şeyi niçin öyle söylediğimizi bil(e)meyiz.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Sözcükler ve ifadeler her daim duygulanımsal yükler içerir ve bir sözcükten diğerine bu yüklerin akışı bilinçdışının etkisi altındadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu bağlamda, failin bilinçdışı savunma mekanizmasını serimlemek amacıyla anlatısal kriminolojik incelemelerde psikanalitik-çekimli söylem çözümlemesi önerilmektedir.
🔬Tür:Deneysel Tarla Denemesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anlatılar · bilinçdışı · duygulanımlar

Özet

Tam olarak neyi kastettiğimizi biliriz, ancak kastettiğimiz şeyi niçin öyle söylediğimizi bil(e)meyiz. İşte tüm mesele burada! Psikanaliz bilinçdışını keşfettiğinden beri sosyal bilimler dil ve bilinçdışı arasındaki gerilimi çözümlemeye çalışmaktadır. Bilinçdışının dil gibi yapılanıp öznenin dilinde semptomlar aracılığıyla tezahür edişi, dilin bilinçdışı yoğunlukları ve duyguları taşıyıcı işlevine psikanalitik bir bakışı gerektirmektedir. Kriminoloji ve ceza adaleti disiplinleri de bu gerilim ve gereklilikten bağışık değildir. Sözcükler ve ifadeler her daim duygulanımsal yükler içerir ve bir sözcükten diğerine bu yüklerin akışı bilinçdışının etkisi altındadır. Böylece, bu yazı, fail söyleminin kriminolojik çözümlemesinde bilinçdışı duygulanımları dikkatle incelemeyi önermektedir: Faillerin anlatıları ve hikâyeleri, ister sorguda ya da duruşma salonunda ister sokakta veya kriminal faaliyet sahalarında olsun, duygulanımsal yatırımların ve yer değiştirmelerin şekillendirdiği bir savunma mekanizması işlevi görür. Anlatı ve hikâye formunda söylemsel parçalar psikanalitik bir kategori olarak fantazmatik senaryolarla failin sosyal gerçekliğini inşa eder. Duygulanım yüklü fantazmatik anlatıların, benliğin (ego) savunma mekanizmalarının anlatı düzeyindeki tezahürleri olarak, failin dramaturjik biçimde sunduğu kendiliğin (self) olası yaralarını örtme ya da bu yaraları yüceltilmiş bir anlatıya dönüştürme işlevi görebileceğine dikkat edilmelidir. Bu bağlamda, failin bilinçdışı savunma mekanizmasını serimlemek amacıyla anlatısal kriminolojik incelemelerde psikanalitik-çekimli söylem çözümlemesi önerilmektedir.

Abstract

We usually know precisely what we mean, yet we rarely know why we say it the way we do. That is the question! Since the discovery of the unconscious, psychoanalysis has urged the social sciences to address the tension between language and the unconscious. The structuring of the unconscious like a language and its manifestation in the subject’s speech through symptoms necessitates a psychoanalytic perspective on language’s function as a carrier of unconscious intensities and affects. Criminology and criminal justice are by no means exempt from this tension. This article proposes a careful examination of the unconscious and affects in the criminological analysis of offender discourse: Words and expressions always carry affective charges, and the movement of these charges from one word to another is shaped not only by conscious intention but also by the unconscious. Offenders’ narratives and stories—whether in interrogations, courtrooms, or within the lived realities of street and criminal cultures—function as defense mechanisms shaped by affective investments and displacements. As discursive fragments, these narratives construct offenders’ social realities through psychoanalytic categories, such as fantasy. Affect-laden fantasmatic narratives, as narrative-level manifestations of the ego’s defense mechanisms, may serve to conceal the possible wounds of the self dramaturgically presented by the agent or to transform these wounds into a sublimated narrative. To reveal the offender’s unconscious defense mechanisms, narrative criminological analyses should use psychoanalytically-inflected discourse analysis.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Mercan, B. A. (2026). Psikososyal ve Anlatısal Kriminolojinin Kesişiminde: Fail Anlatılarında Dil, Bilinçdışı ve Duygulanımlar. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 192–213. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2026-1797571

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (119)

  1. Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. Norton. google scholar
  2. Aspden, K., & Hayward, K. J. (2015). Narrative criminology and cultural criminology: Shared biographies, different lives? In L. Presser & S. Sandberg (Eds.), Narrative criminology: Understanding stories of crime (pp. 235–259). New York: New York University Press. google scholar
  3. Bailly, L. (2012). Lacan: A beginner’s guide. Oneworld. google scholar
  4. Bourgois, P. (2003). In search of respect: Selling crack in El Barrio. Cambridge university press. google scholar
  5. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books. google scholar
  6. Breuer, J., & Freud, S. (1988 [1895]). Studies on hysteria. London: Penguin. google scholar
  7. Chiesa, L. (2007). Subjectivity and otherness: A philosophical reading of Lacan. MIT Press. google scholar
  8. Cotterill, J. (Ed.). (2002). Language in the legal process. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  9. Coulthard, R. M. (2000a). Whose text is it? On the linguistic investigation of authorship. In S. Sarangi & R. M. Coulthard (Eds.), Discourse and social life (pp. 271–287). Longman. google scholar
  10. Coulthard, R. M. (2000b). Suppressed dialogue in a confession statement. In R. M. Coulthard, J. Cotterill, & F. Rock (Eds.), Working with dialogue (pp. 417–424). Max Niemeyer Verlag. google scholar
  11. Derrida, J. (1992). Force of law: The “mystical foundation of authority”. In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, & D. G. Carlson (Eds.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice (pp. 3–67). Routledge. google scholar
  12. Ellis, A., Winlow, S., & Hall, S. (2017). ‘Throughout my life I’ve had people walk all over me’: Trauma in the lives of violent men. The Sociological Review, 65(4), 699–713. google scholar
  13. Evans, D. (1996). An introductory dictionary of Lacanian psychoanalysis. Routledge. google scholar
  14. Ferrell, J. (1995). Culture, crime, and cultural criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 3(2), 25–42. google scholar
  15. Ferrell, J., & Sanders, C. R. (1995). Cultural criminology. Boston: Northeastern University Press. google scholar
  16. Ferrell, J., Hayward, K., & Young, J. (2008). Cultural criminology: An invitation. London: Sage. google scholar
  17. Ferrell, J., Hayward, K., Morrison, W., & Presdee, M. (2004). Cultural criminology unleashed. London: Glasshouse Press. google scholar
  18. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press. google scholar
  19. Fink, B. (1997). The Lacanian subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. google scholar
  20. Fleetwood, J. (2014). Drug mules: Women in the international cocaine trade. London: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  21. Fleetwood, J. (2015). In search of respectability: Narrative practice in a women’s prison in Quito, Ecuador. In L. Presser & S. Sandberg (Eds.), Narrative criminology: Understanding stories of crime (pp. 42–68). New York: New York University Press. google scholar
  22. Fleetwood, J. (2016). Narrative habitus: Thinking through structure/agency in the narratives of offenders. Crime, Media, Culture, 12(2), 173–192. google scholar
  23. Fleetwood, J., Presser, L., Sandberg, S., & Ugelvik, T. (Eds.). (2019). The Emerald handbook of narrative criminology. Emerald Publishing. google scholar
  24. Freud, S. (1991 [1915]). On metapsychology. London: Penguin. google scholar
  25. Freud, S. (2003 [1905]). The Joke and its relation to the unconscious. Penguin. google scholar
  26. Freud, S. (2010 [1900]). The interpretation of dreams (J. Crick, Trans.; Original work published 1899). Oxford University Press. google scholar
  27. Frosh, S. (2012). A brief introduction to psychoanalytic theory. Bloomsbury Academic. google scholar
  28. Gadd, D. & Farrall, S. (2004) Criminal careers, desistance and subjectivity: Interpreting men’s narratives of change. Theoretical Criminology, 8, 123–155. google scholar
  29. Gadd, D., & Jefferson, T. (2007). Psychosocial criminology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. google scholar
  30. Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Blackwell. google scholar
  31. Glynos, J. (1999). From identity to identification: Discourse theory and psychoanalysis in context (Essex Papers in Politics and Government, No. 11; Sub-Series in Ideology and Discourse Analysis). University of Essex. google scholar
  32. Glynos, J. (2001). The grip of ideology: A Lacanian approach to the theory of ideology. Journal of political ideologies, 6(2), 191–214. google scholar
  33. Glynos, J. (2011). On the ideological and political significance of fantasy in the organization of work. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 16(4), 373–393. google scholar
  34. Glynos, J. (2021). Critical fantasy studies. Journal of language and politics, 20(1), 95–111. google scholar
  35. Glynos, J., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2008). Lacan and political subjectivity: Fantasy and enjoyment in psychoanalysis and political theory. Subjectivity, 24(1), 256–274. google scholar
  36. Hall, S. (1997). Visceral cultures and criminal practices. Theoretical Criminology, 1, 453–478. google scholar
  37. Hall, S. (2002). Daubing the drudges of fury: Men, violence and the piety of the ‘hegemonic masculinity’ thesis. Theoretical Criminology, 6, 35–61. google scholar
  38. Hall, S., Winlow, S., & Ancrum, C. (2008). Criminal identities and consumer culture: crime, exclusion and the new culture of narcissm. Willan. google scholar
  39. Hayward, K., & Presdee, M. (2010). Framing crime: Cultural criminology and the image. London: Routledge. google scholar
  40. Heffer, C. (2020). Narrative in the trial: Constructing crime stories in court. In M. Coulthard, A. May, & R. Sousa-Silva (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp. 192–210). Routledge. google scholar
  41. Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage. google scholar
  42. Howarth, D. (2000). Discourse. McGraw-Hill. google scholar
  43. Howarth, D. (2005). Applying discourse theory: The method of articulation. In D. Howarth & J. Torfing (Eds.), Discourse theory and European politics: Identity, policy and governance (pp. 316–349). Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  44. Howarth, D., Glynos, J., & Griggs, S. (2016). Discourse, explanation and critique. Critical Policy Studies, 10(1), 99–104. google scholar
  45. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. google scholar
  46. Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: The moral and sensual attractions of doing evil. New York: Basic Books. google scholar
  47. King, B. (2022). Young black street masculinities: Vulnerability, knife-carrying and survival on a disadvantaged housing estate. Springer. google scholar
  48. Klein, M. (1932). The psycho-analysis of children (A. Strachey, Trans.). The Hogarth Press & The Institute of Psycho-Analysis. google scholar
  49. Klenowski, P. M., Copes, H., & Mullins, C. W. (2011). Gender, identity, and accounts: How white collar offenders do gender when making sense of their crimes. Justice Quarterly, 28, 46–69. google scholar
  50. Lacan, J. (1978). The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis (J.-A. Miller, Ed.; A. Sheridan, Trans.). W. W. Norton. google scholar
  51. Lacan, J. (1998). The seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book XX: On feminine sexuality, the limits of love and knowledge (Encore) (J.-A. Miller, Ed.; B. Fink, Trans.). W. W. Norton & Company. google scholar
  52. Lacan, J. (2006). Écrits. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. google scholar
  53. Lacan, J. (2014 [1962/1963]). The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book X: Anxiety (J.-A. Miller, Ed.; A. R. Price, Trans.). Polity Press. google scholar
  54. Laws, B. (2022). Reimagining ‘the self’ in criminology: Transcendence, unconscious states and the limits of narrative criminology. Theoretical Criminology, 26(3), 475–493. google scholar
  55. Maruna, S., & Copes, H. (2005). Excuses, excuses: What have we learned from five decades of neutralization research? In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 32, pp. 221–320). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
  56. Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: movements, affect, sensation. Duke University Press. google scholar
  57. Mercan, B. A. (2020a). Doing criminological research: Affective states versus emotional reactions. Theoretical Criminology, 24(2), 335–352. google scholar
  58. Mercan, B. A. (2020b). Persistence and career criminality: Enjoying crime! Crime, Media, Culture, 16(2), 165–184. google scholar
  59. Mercan, B. A. (2020c). The making of the professional criminal in Turkey. Ethnography, 21(1), 92–112. google scholar
  60. Mercan, B. A. (2022). The transmission of crime as work in Turkey: Identification and strategic mutuality. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 22(4), 542–558. google scholar
  61. Messerschmidt, J. (1993). Masculinities and crime. Rowan and Littlefield. google scholar
  62. Milovanovic, Dragan (1994). The postmodernist turn: Lacan, psychoanalytic semiotics, and the construction of subjectivity in law. Emory International Law Review, 8, 68–98. google scholar
  63. Presser, L. (2008). Been a heavy life: Stories of violent men. Urbana, IL, & Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press. google scholar
  64. Presser, L. (2009). The narratives of offenders. Theoretical Criminology, 13(2), 177–200. google scholar
  65. Presser, L. (2010). Collecting and analysing the stories of offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21(4), 431–446. google scholar
  66. Presser, L. (2012). Getting on top through mass murder: Narrative, metaphor, and violence. Crime, Media, Culture, 8(1), 3–21. google scholar
  67. Presser, L. (2013). Why we harm. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. google scholar
  68. Presser, L. (2016). Criminology and the narrative turn. Crime, Media, Culture, 12(2), 137–151. google scholar
  69. Presser, L. (2018). Inside story: How narratives drive mass harm. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. google scholar
  70. Presser, L., & Sandberg, S. (2015). Introduction: What is the story? In L. Presser & S. Sandberg (Eds.), Narrative criminology: Understanding stories of crime (pp. 1–20). New York: New York University Press. google scholar
  71. Reid, E. (2023). ‘Trap Life’: The psychosocial underpinnings of street crime in inner-city London. The British Journal of Criminology, 63(1), 168–183. google scholar
  72. Rock, F. (2001). The genesis of a witness statement. Forensic Linguistics, 8(1), 44–72. google scholar
  73. Roudinesco, E. (2003). The mirror stage: An obliterated archive. In J.-M. Rabaté (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Lacan (pp. 25–34). Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  74. Sandberg, S. & Pedersen, W. (2009). Street capital: black cannabis dealers in a white welfare state. The Policy Press. google scholar
  75. Sandberg, S. (2008). Street capital: Ethnicity and violence on the streets of Oslo. Theoretical Criminology, 12(2), 153–171. google scholar
  76. Sandberg, S. (2009a). Gangster, victim, or both? Street drug dealers’ interdiscursive construction of sameness and difference in self- presentations. The British Journal of Sociology, 60(3), 523–542. google scholar
  77. Sandberg, S. (2009b). A narrative search for respect. Deviant Behavior, 30, 487–510. google scholar
  78. Sandberg, S. (2010). What can lies tell us about life? Notes toward a framework of narrative criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21(4), 447–465. google scholar
  79. Sandberg, S. (2012). Is cannabis use normalised, celebrated or neutralised? Analysing talk as action. Addiction Research & Theory, 20(5), 372–381. google scholar
  80. Sandberg, S. (2013). Are self-narratives unified or fragmented, strategic or determined? Reading Breivik’s manifesto in light of narrative criminology. Acta Sociologica, 56(1), 65–79. google scholar
  81. Sandberg, S. (2015). Terrorism as cultural bricolage: The case of Anders Behring Breivik. In D. Ziegler, M. Gerster, & S. Krämer (Eds.), Framing excessive violence: Discourse and dynamics (pp. 177–196). London: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  82. Sandberg, S. (2016). The importance of stories untold: Life story, event story and trope. Crime, Media, Culture, 12(2), 153–171. google scholar
  83. Sandberg, S., & Tutenges, S. (2015). Meeting the Djinn: Stories of drug use, bad trips, and addiction. In L. Presser & S. Sandberg (Eds.), Narrative criminology: Understanding stories of crime (pp. 150–173). New York: New York University Press. google scholar
  84. Sandberg, S., & Ugelvik, T. (2016). The past, present, and future of narrative criminology: A review and an invitation. Crime, Media, Culture, 12(2), 129–136 google scholar
  85. Sandberg, S., Oksanen, A., Berntzen, L. E., & Kiilakoski, T. (2014). Stories in action: Cultural influences of school shootings on the terrorist attacks in Norway. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 7(2), 277–296. google scholar
  86. Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics (Wade Baskin, Trans.). McGraw-Hill. google scholar
  87. Schulz, S., Baak, M., Stahl, G., & Adams, B. (2021). Restorative practices for preventing/countering violent extremism: An affective- discursive examination of extreme emotional incidents. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 42(8), 1227–1245. google scholar
  88. Shuy, R. W. (1998). The language of confession, interrogation, and deception. Sage. google scholar
  89. Snodgrass, J. (1982). A note on Stanley’s psychology. In J. Snodgrass (Ed.), The Jack-Roller at seventy: A fifty-year follow-up (pp. 167–172). D. C. Heath & Company. google scholar
  90. Stavrakakis, Y. (1999). Lacan and the political. Routledge. google scholar
  91. Stavrakakis, Y. (ed.). (2019). Routledge handbook of psychoanalytic political theory. Routledge. google scholar
  92. Taylor, E. (2022). Armed robbers: Identity and cultural mythscapes in the lucky country. Oxford University Press. google scholar
  93. Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: space politics and affect. Routledge. google scholar
  94. Treadwell, J., & Garland, J. (2011). Masculinity, marginalization and violence: A case study of the English Defence League. The British Journal of Criminology, 51(4), 621–634. google scholar
  95. Treadwell, J., Ancrum, C., & Kelly, C. (2020). Taxing times: inter-criminal victimization and drug robbery amongst the English professional criminal milieu. Deviant Behavior, 41(1), 57–69. google scholar
  96. Tutenges, S., & Sandberg, S. (2014). Bad boys telling sexist stories. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(3), 348–349. google scholar
  97. Ugelvik, T. (2012). Prisoners and their victims: Techniques of neutralization, techniques of the self. Ethnography, 13(3), 259–277. google scholar
  98. Ugelvik, T. (2014). Power and resistance in prison: Doing time, doing freedom. London: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  99. Ugelvik, T. (2015). The rapist and the proper criminal: The exclusion of immoral others as narrative work on the self. In L. Presser & S. Sandberg (Eds.), Narrative criminology: Understanding stories of crime (pp. 23–41). New York: New York University Press. google scholar
  100. Ugelvik, T. (2016). Techniques of legitimation: The narrative construction of legitimacy among immigration detention officers. Crime, Media, Culture, 12(2), 215–232. google scholar
  101. Van Hulst, M. (2013). Storytelling at the police station: The canteen culture revisited. The British Journal of Criminology, 53(4), 624–642. google scholar
  102. Van Hulst, M., & Tsoukas, H. (2023). Understanding extended narrative sensemaking: How police officers accomplish story work. Organization, 30(4), 730–753. google scholar
  103. Verde, A. (2017). Narrative criminology: Crime as produced by and re-lived through narratives. In Oxford research encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.156 google scholar
  104. Verde, A. (2020). Whose narratives? Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit, 10(3), 35–58. google scholar
  105. Verde, A., & Knechtlin, N. (2019). Protecting and defending mummy: Narrative criminology and psychosocial criminology. In J. Fleetwood, L. Presser, S. Sandberg, & T. Ugelvik (Eds.), The Emerald handbook of narrative criminology (pp. 395–414). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing. google scholar
  106. Verde, A., Angelini, F., Boverini, S., & Marajana, M. (2006). The narrative structure of psychiatric reports. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 29(1), 1–12. google scholar
  107. Wailling, J., Kooijman, A., Hughes, J., & O’Hara, J. K. (2022). Humanising harm: Using a restorative approach to heal and learn from adverse events. Health Expectations, 25(4), 1192–1199. google scholar
  108. Walklate, S., Maher, J., McCulloch, J., Fitz-Gibbon, K., & Beavis, K. (2019). Victim stories and victim policy: Is there a case for a narrative victimology?. Crime, media, culture, 15(2), 199–215. google scholar
  109. Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: a new social science understanding. Sage. google scholar
  110. Winlow S. (2012). ‘All that is sacred is profaned’: Towards a theory of subjective violence. In Hall S., Winlow S. (Eds.), New directions in criminological theory (pp. 199–215). London, UK: Routledge. google scholar
  111. Winlow S. (2014). Trauma, guilt and the unconscious: Some theoretical notes on violent subjectivity. The Sociological Review, 62(S2), 32–49. google scholar
  112. Winlow, S. (2010). Badfellas: Crime, tradition and new masculinities. Routledge. google scholar
  113. Winlow, S., & Hall, S. (2006) Violent Night. Berg. google scholar
  114. Winlow, S., & Hall, S. (2009). Retaliate first: Memory, humiliation and male violence. Crime, Media, Culture, 5(3), 285–304. google scholar
  115. Young, A. (1995). Imagining crime. London: Sage. google scholar
  116. Young, A. (2023). Arrested mobilities: Affective encounters and crime scenes in the city. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 19(2), 210–226. google scholar
  117. Žižek, S. (1989). The plague of fantasies. Verso Books. google scholar
  118. Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. Verso Books. google scholar
  119. Zupancic, A. (2008). The odd one in: On comedy. Mit Press. google scholar