Dergiler / Frontiers in Life Sciences and Related Technologies / 2026 / Volume: 7

Boron-doped mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles as a dual-delivery platform for tetracycline and phytochemicals: A synergistic strategy against multidrug-resistant bacteria

Hatice Kurnaz(HALİÇ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7777-6857
Murat Kazancı(İSTANBUL MEDENİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5622-6960
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-10-24
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These findings support B-MBG nanoparticles as a customizable anti-infective delivery platform for combining conventional antibiotics with poorly soluble natural adjuvants, although further validation in more complex biological and translational models is required.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and biofilm-associated tolerance substantially limit the effectiveness of conventional antibiotic therapy.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Tetracycline and each phytochemical were nominal 2:1 input mass ratio .
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These findings support B-MBG nanoparticles as a customizable anti-infective delivery platform for combining conventional antibiotics with poorly soluble natural adjuvants, although further validation in more complex biological and translational models is required.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Antimicrobial resistance · biofilm inhibition · dual-drug delivery

Özet

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and biofilm-associated tolerance substantially limit the effectiveness of conventional antibiotic therapy. This study investigated boron-doped mesoporous bioactive glass (B-MBG) nanoparticles as a dual-payload delivery system for the combined administration of tetracycline and selected hydrophobic phytochemical adjuvants, including berberine, curcumin, and resveratrol. The platform was designed to improve antibacterial and antibiofilm activity while facilitating the delivery of poorly soluble natural compounds. B-MBG nanoparticles were synthesized using a sol-gel method. Tetracycline and each phytochemical were nominal 2:1 input mass ratio . Particle morphology and structure were characterized by SEM, SEM-EDS, DLS, N 2 adsorption–desorption analysis, and XRD. Biological activity was examined by planktonic microdilution at 24 and 48 h, disk diffusion, and a 72-h crystal violet biofilm assay. Cytocompatibility was evaluated in HaCaT keratinocytes at 24, 48, and 72 h. The resulting datasets were analyzed using multiparametric statistical methods and principal component analysis. B-MBG nanoparticles exhibited a predominantly uniform spherical morphology with particle sizes of approximately 100-150 nm. The mesoporous structure had a specific surface area of 156.14 m² g⁻¹ and a mean pore size of 4.27 nm. XRD analysis confirmed an amorphous borosilicate network accompanied by microcrystalline calcite. Co-loading with berberine or resveratrol markedly improved the antibacterial activity of carrier-bound tetracycline, decreasing the planktonic IC₅₀ against E. coli by 13- to 33-fold relative to Tet-B-MBG and producing IC₅₀ estimates below the detection threshold (<0.5 µg mL⁻¹) against MRSA. Free phytochemicals frequently stimulated biofilm formation at sub-inhibitory concentrations, particularly in E. coli and S. epidermidis . Incorporation into the B-MBG co-delivery system reduced this stimulation; with Tet-Res-B-MBG the mean biofilm response was 152.6 and 101.9 percentage points higher than with free resveratrol (q<0.05), although biofilm biomass remained above the untreated control. Cytocompatibility was time dependent, with the reduction in cell viability observed at 24 h followed by cell viabilities of 78–115% at 48–72 h within the tested therapeutic concentration range. B-MBG-mediated co-delivery enhanced the antibacterial activity of tetracycline and reduced the pro-biofilm effects of free phytochemical adjuvants . Rather than acting as an intrinsically antimicrobial carrier, B-MBG provided a tunable matrix through which payload selection and controlled exposure could be used to improve biological performance. These findings support B-MBG nanoparticles as a customizable anti-infective delivery platform for combining conventional antibiotics with poorly soluble natural adjuvants, although further validation in more complex biological and translational models is required.

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and biofilm-associated tolerance substantially limit the effectiveness of conventional antibiotic therapy. This study investigated boron-doped mesoporous bioactive glass (B-MBG) nanoparticles as a dual-payload delivery system for the combined administration of tetracycline and selected hydrophobic phytochemical adjuvants, including berberine, curcumin, and resveratrol. The platform was designed to improve antibacterial and antibiofilm activity while facilitating the delivery of poorly soluble natural compounds. B-MBG nanoparticles were synthesized using a sol-gel method. Tetracycline and each phytochemical were nominal 2:1 input mass ratio . Particle morphology and structure were characterized by SEM, SEM-EDS, DLS, N 2 adsorption–desorption analysis, and XRD. Biological activity was examined by planktonic microdilution at 24 and 48 h, disk diffusion, and a 72-h crystal violet biofilm assay. Cytocompatibility was evaluated in HaCaT keratinocytes at 24, 48, and 72 h. The resulting datasets were analyzed using multiparametric statistical methods and principal component analysis. B-MBG nanoparticles exhibited a predominantly uniform spherical morphology with particle sizes of approximately 100-150 nm. The mesoporous structure had a specific surface area of 156.14 m² g⁻¹ and a mean pore size of 4.27 nm. XRD analysis confirmed an amorphous borosilicate network accompanied by microcrystalline calcite. Co-loading with berberine or resveratrol markedly improved the antibacterial activity of carrier-bound tetracycline, decreasing the planktonic IC₅₀ against E. coli by 13- to 33-fold relative to Tet-B-MBG and producing IC₅₀ estimates below the detection threshold (<0.5 µg mL⁻¹) against MRSA. Free phytochemicals frequently stimulated biofilm formation at sub-inhibitory concentrations, particularly in E. coli and S. epidermidis . Incorporation into the B-MBG co-delivery system reduced this stimulation; with Tet-Res-B-MBG the mean biofilm response was 152.6 and 101.9 percentage points higher than with free resveratrol (q<0.05), although biofilm biomass remained above the untreated control. Cytocompatibility was time dependent, with the reduction in cell viability observed at 24 h followed by cell viabilities of 78–115% at 48–72 h within the tested therapeutic concentration range. B-MBG-mediated co-delivery enhanced the antibacterial activity of tetracycline and reduced the pro-biofilm effects of free phytochemical adjuvants . Rather than acting as an intrinsically antimicrobial carrier, B-MBG provided a tunable matrix through which payload selection and controlled exposure could be used to improve biological performance. These findings support B-MBG nanoparticles as a customizable anti-infective delivery platform for combining conventional antibiotics with poorly soluble natural adjuvants, although further validation in more complex biological and translational models is required.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kurnaz, H., Kazancı, M., Uras, M. E. (2026). Boron-doped mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles as a dual-delivery platform for tetracycline and phytochemicals: A synergistic strategy against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Frontiers in Life Sciences and Related Technologies, Volume: 7. https://doi.org/10.51753/flsrt.1943022

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (74)

  1. Ahmed, M. N., Porse, A., Sommer, M. O. A., Høiby, N., & Ciofu, O. (2018). Evolution of antibiotic resistance in biofilm and planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations exposed to subinhibitory levels of ciprofloxacin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 62(8), 10-22.
  2. Alharthi, S., Ziora, Z. M., Janjua, T., Popat, A., & Moyle, P. M. (2022). Formulation and biological evaluation of mesoporous silica nanoparticles loaded with combinations of sortase A inhibitors and antimicrobial peptides. Pharmaceutics, 14(5), 986.
  3. Almasri, D., & Dahman, Y. (2023). Prosthetic joint infections: biofilm formation, management, and the potential of mesoporous bioactive glass as a new treatment option. Pharmaceutics, 15(5), 1401.
  4. Almatroudi, A. (2025). Biofilm resilience: molecular mechanisms driving antibiotic resistance in clinical contexts. Biology, 14(2), 165.
  5. ALOthman, Z. A. (2012). A review: fundamental aspects of silicate mesoporous materials. Materials, 5(12), 2874-2902.
  6. Álvarez, E., Estevez, M., Gallo-Cordova, A., Gonzalez, B., Castillo, R. R., Morales, M. D. P.,. & Vallet-Regi, M. (2022). Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles decorated mesoporous silica nanosystem for combined antibiofilm therapy. Pharmaceutics, 14(1), 163.
  7. Álvarez, E., González, B., Lozano, D., Doadrio, A. L., Colilla, M., & Izquierdo-Barba, I. (2021). Nanoantibiotics based in mesoporous silica nanoparticles: new formulations for bacterial infection treatment. Pharmaceutics, 13(12), 2033.
  8. Cavallo, I., Sivori, F., Mastrofrancesco, A., Abril, E., Pontone, M., Di Domenico, E. G., & Pimpinelli, F. (2024). Bacterial biofilm in chronic wounds and possible therapeutic approaches. Biology, 13(2), 109.
  9. Cheng, S., Meng, X. H., Li, Z., Han, H. H., & Zhang, Y. F. (2025). Nanomaterial-mediated antibiotic delivery: a novel strategy for osteomyelitis therapy. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 13, 1671151.
  10. Colilla, M., & Vallet-Regí, M. (2023). Organically modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles against bacterial resistance. Chemistry of Materials, 35(21), 8788-8805.
  11. Cui, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Liu, F., Duan, G., Chen, S.,. & Yang, H. (2024). Recent advances in the use of resveratrol against Staphylococcus aureus infections. Medicine International, 4(6), 67.
  12. Damian‐Buda, A. I., Lorke, M., Boccaccini, A. R., & Unalan, I. (2025). Novel Antioxidant and Antibacterial Injectable Hydrogels Incorporating Clove Oil‐Loaded Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles: A Promising Strategy for Enhanced Bone Regeneration. Macromolecular Bioscience, 25(11), e00252.
  13. Deilmann, L., Winter, O., Cerrutti, B., Bradtmuller, H., Herzig, C., Limbeck, A.,. & Eder, D. (2020). Effect of boron incorporation on the bioactivity, structure, and mechanical properties of ordered mesoporous bioactive glasses. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 8(7), 1456-1465.
  14. Duda-Madej, A., Viscardi, S., Bazan, H., & Sobieraj, J. (2025). Exploring the role of berberine as a molecular disruptor in antimicrobial strategies. Pharmaceuticals, 18(7), 947.
  15. Ege, D., Zheng, K., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2022). Borate bioactive glasses (BBG): bone regeneration, wound healing applications, and future directions. ACS Applied Bio Materials, 5(8), 3608-3622.
  16. Elawady, R., Aboulela, A. G., Gaballah, A., Ghazal, A. A., & Amer, A. N. (2024). Antimicrobial Sub-MIC induces Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation without affecting the bacterial count. BMC Infectious Diseases, 24(1), 1065.
  17. Etheridge, M. L., Campbell, S. A., Erdman, A. G., Haynes, C. L., Wolf, S. M., & McCullough, J. (2013). The big picture on nanomedicine: the sta-
  18. te of investigational and approved nanomedicine products. Nanomedicine: nanotechnology, biology and medicine, 9(1), 1-14.
  19. Fotie, J. (2025). Applications of tailored mesoporous silicate nanomaterials in regenerative medicine and theranostics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(16), 7918.
  20. Gabriel, A. M., Damian-Buda, A. I., Brugnari, F. M., Camargo, E. R., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2026). Bioactive glass-based core-shell nanoparticles: Multifunctional platforms for controlled drug release and biomedical applications. Materials Today Bio, 102617.
  21. Greasley, S. L., Page, S. J., Sirovica, S., Chen, S., Martin, R. A., Riveiro, A.,. & Jones, J. R. (2016). Controlling particle size in the Stöber process and incorporation of calcium. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 36;469, 213-223.
  22. Grudzien, R. M., Grabicka, B. E., & Jaroniec, M. (2006). Adsorption and structural properties of channel-like and cage-like organosilicas. Adsorption, 12(5), 293-308.
  23. Guleryuz, B., Isik, A., & Gulsoy, M. (2024). Synergistic effect of mesoporous silica nanocarrier-assisted photodynamic therapy and anticancer agent activity on lung cancer cells. Lasers in Medical Science, 39(1), 91.
  24. He, J., Cui, Y., Liu, Y., Mao, J., Dong, Y., Yao, R.,. & Xue, J. (2025). Resveratrol inhibits the formation of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms by reducing PIA, eDNA release, and ROS production. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 12, 1594239.
  25. Hu, P., Huang, P., & Chen, M. W. (2013). Curcumin reduces Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation by inhibiting sortase A activity. Archives of Oral Biology, 58(10), 1343-1348.
  26. Iranshahy, M., Hanafi-Bojd, M. Y., Aghili, S. H., Iranshahi, M., Nabavi, S. M., Saberi, S.,. & Hasanpour, M. (2023). Curcumin-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles for drug delivery: synthesis, biological assays and therapeutic potential–a review. RSC Advances, 13(32), 22250-22267.
  27. ISO, I. (2009). Biological evaluation of medical devices—Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. Geneve, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 10, 9781570203558.
  28. Joshi, A. A., & Patil, R. H. (2025). Nanoparticles targeting biofilms: a new era in combating antimicrobial resistance. Medicine in Microecology, 26, 100156.
  29. Kourmouli, A., Valenti, M., van Rijn, E., Beaumont, H. J., Kalantzi, O. I., Schmidt-Ott, A., & Biskos, G. (2018). Can disc diffusion susceptibility tests assess the antimicrobial activity of engineered nanoparticles?. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 20(3), 62.
  30. Kresge, A. C., Leonowicz, M. E., Roth, W. J., Vartuli, J. C., & Beck, J. S. (1992). Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. Nature, 359(6397), 710-712.
  31. Lan, J., Zou, J., Xin, H., Sun, J., Han, T., Sun, M., & Niu, M. (2025). Nanomedicines as disruptors or inhibitors of biofilms: Opportunities in addressing antimicrobial resistance. Journal of Controlled Release, 381, 113589.
  32. Liao, Y., Li, B., Chen, H., Ma, Y., Wang, F., Huang, L.,. & Yue, P. (2025). Stimuli-responsive mesoporous silica nanoplatforms for smart antibacterial therapies: From single to combination strategies. Journal of Controlled Release, 378, 60-91.
  33. Liu, J., Huang, T., Xu, Z., Mao, Y., Soteyome, T., Liu, G.,. & Seneviratne, G. (2023a). Sub-MIC streptomycin and tetracycline enhanced Staphylococcus aureus Guangzhou-SAU749 biofilm formation, an in-depth study on transcriptomics. Biofilm, 6, 100156.
  34. Liu, J., Mu, W., Gao, T., Fang, Y., Zhang, N., & Liu, Y. (2023b). CD13-mediated pegylated carboxymethyl chitosan-capped mesoporous silica nanoparticles for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Pharmaceutics, 15(2), 426.
  35. Lo Bello, G., Nawaz, Q., Ferrari, P. F., Pastorino, L., Raiteri, R., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2026). Unlocking the power of quercetin‐encapsulated mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles: a multifunctional approach to bone regeneration. Advanced Engineering Materials, 28(4), 2500979.
  36. Marques, C., Fernandes, M. H., & Lima, S. A. C. (2023). Elucidating berberine’s therapeutic and photosensitizer potential through nanomedicine tools. Pharmaceutics, 15(9), 2282.
  37. Martínez-Carmona, M., Gun’ko, Y. K., & Vallet-Regí, M. (2018). Mesoporous silica materials as drug delivery:“The Nightmare” of bacterial infection. Pharmaceutics, 10(4), 279.
  38. Memar, M. Y., Mehdizadeh, S., Sharifi, S., & Dizaj, S. M. (2025). Antibacterial activity of curcumin-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles against Streptococcus mutans. The Open Dentistry Journal, 19(1).
  39. Mohammad, G. J. (2022). Expression of icaA, B, D, R and ebps biofilm-associated genes in methicillin-resistant-Staphylococcus aureus in exposure to curcumin. Gene Reports, 27, 101616.
  40. Morita, Y., Nakashima, K. I., Nishino, K., Kotani, K., Tomida, J., Inoue, M., & Kawamura, Y. (2016). Berberine is a novel type efflux inhibitor which attenuates the MexXY-mediated aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1223.
  41. Murray, C. J., Ikuta, K. S., Sharara, F., Swetschinski, L., Aguilar, G. R., Gray, A.,. & Tasak, N. (2022). Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. The Lancet, 399(10325), 629-655.
  42. Naghavi, M., Vollset, S. E., Ikuta, K. S., Swetschinski, L. R., Gray, A. P., Wool, E. E.,. & Dekker, D. M. (2024). Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. The Lancet, 404(10459), 1199-1226.
  43. Nazir, A., Nazir, A., Zuhair, V., Aman, S., Sadiq, S. U. R., Hasan, A. H.,. & Bulimbe, D. B. (2025). The global challenge of antimicrobial resistance: mechanisms, case studies, and mitigation approaches. Health Science Reports, 8(7), e71077.
  44. Neščáková, Z., Zheng, K., Liverani, L., Nawaz, Q., Galusková, D., Kaňková, H.,. & Boccaccini, A. R. (2019). Multifunctional zinc ion doped sol–gel derived mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Bioactive Materials, 4, 312-321.
  45. Otto, M. (2009). Staphylococcus epidermidis the accidental pathogen. Nature reviews microbiology, 7(8), 555-567.
  46. Pechnikova, N. A., Poimenidou, M., Patsidou, C., Zafeiriou-Chatziefraimidou, M., Iliadis, I., & Yaremenko, A. V. (2026). Engineered Nanoparticles for Combating Drug-Resistant Bacteria and Bacterial Biofilms. ACS Nano Medicine, 1(3), 492-546, DOI: 10.1021/acsnanomed.5c00060.
  47. Polo-Montalvo, A., Gómez-Cerezo, N., Cicuéndez, M., González, B., Izquierdo-Barba, I., & Arcos, D. (2025). Osteogenic and Antibacterial Response of Levofloxacin-Loaded Mesoporous Nanoparticles Functionalized with N-Acetylcysteine. Pharmaceutics, 17(4), 519.
  48. Rohman, A. (2012). Analysis of curcuminoids in food and pharmaceutical products. International Food Research Journal, 19(1), 19.
  49. Ruiz-Clavijo, A., Hurt, A. P., Kotha, A. K., & Coleman, N. J. (2019). Effect of calcium precursor on the bioactivity and biocompatibility of sol-gel-derived glasses. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 10(1), 13.
  50. Salinas, A. J., & Esbrit, P. (2022). Mesoporous bioglasses enriched with bioactive agents for bone repair, with a special highlight of María Vallet-Regí’s contribution. Pharmaceutics, 14(1), 202.
  51. Su, F., & Wang, J. (2018). Berberine inhibits the MexXY OprM efflux pump to reverse imipenem resistance in a clinical carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate in a planktonic state. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 15(1), 467-472.
  52. Vallet-Regí, M., Colilla, M., Izquierdo-Barba, I., Vitale-Brovarone, C., & Fiorilli, S. (2022). Achievements in mesoporous bioactive glasses for biomedical applications. Pharmaceutics, 14(12), 2636.
  53. Vallet-Regi, M., Rámila, A., Del Real, R. P., & Pérez-Pariente, J. (2001). A new property of MCM-41: drug delivery system. Chemistry of Materials, 13(2), 308-311.
  54. World Health Organization. WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024: bacterial pathogens of public health importance to guide research, development and strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/
  55. Wu, C., & Chang, J. (2014). Multifunctional mesoporous bioactive glasses for effective delivery of therapeutic ions and drug/growth factors. Journal of Controlled Release, 193, 282-295.
  56. Yakin, F. E., Barisik, M., & Sen, T. (2020). Pore size and porosity dependent zeta potentials of mesoporous silica nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 124(36), 19579-19587.
  57. Yalcin, B., Akcan, D., Yalcin, I. E., Alphan, M. C., Senturk, K., Ozyigit, I. I., & Arda, L. (2020). Effect of Mg doping on morphology, photocatalytic activity and related biological properties of Zn1-xMgxO nanoparticles. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, 44(4), 1177-1199.
  58. Yalcin, B., Arda, L., Yalcin, I. E., Senturk, K., Alphan, M. C., Akcan, D., & Ozyigit, I. I. (2023). Exploration of the improving effect of Cd-doping on structural, photocatalytic, and biological properties of ZnO nanoparticles. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 25(7), 146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-023-05771-w
  59. Zheng, K., Fan, Y., Torre, E., Balasubramanian, P., Taccardi, N., Cassinelli, C.,. & Boccaccini, A. R. (2020). Incorporation of boron in mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles reduces inflammatory response and delays osteogenic differentiation. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 37(7), 2000054.
  60. Zheng, K., Niu, W., Lei, B., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2021). Immunomodulatory bioactive glasses for tissue regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia, 133, 168-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.08.023
  61. Zhou, H., Wang, W., Cai, L., & Yang, T. (2023). Potentiation and mechanism of berberine as an antibiotic adjuvant against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Infection and Drug Resistance, 16, 7313-7326.
  62. Álvarez, E., Estevez, M., Gallo-Cordova, A., Gonzalez, B., Castillo, R. R., Morales, M. D. P.,. & Vallet-Regi, M. (2022). Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles decorated mesoporous silica nanosystem for combined antibiofilm therapy. Pharmaceutics, 14(1), 163.
  63. Cui, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Liu, F., Duan, G., Chen, S.,. & Yang, H. (2024). Recent advances in the use of resveratrol against Staphylococcus aureus infections. Medicine International, 4(6), 67.
  64. Deilmann, L., Winter, O., Cerrutti, B., Bradtmuller, H., Herzig, C., Limbeck, A.,. & Eder, D. (2020). Effect of boron incorporation on the bioactivity, structure, and mechanical properties of ordered mesoporous bioactive glasses. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 8(7), 1456-1465.
  65. Greasley, S. L., Page, S. J., Sirovica, S., Chen, S., Martin, R. A., Riveiro, A.,. & Jones, J. R. (2016). Controlling particle size in the Stöber process and incorporation of calcium. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 36;469, 213-223.
  66. He, J., Cui, Y., Liu, Y., Mao, J., Dong, Y., Yao, R.,. & Xue, J. (2025). Resveratrol inhibits the formation of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms by reducing PIA, eDNA release, and ROS production. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 12, 1594239.
  67. Iranshahy, M., Hanafi-Bojd, M. Y., Aghili, S. H., Iranshahi, M., Nabavi, S. M., Saberi, S.,. & Hasanpour, M. (2023). Curcumin-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles for drug delivery: synthesis, biological assays and therapeutic potential–a review. RSC Advances, 13(32), 22250-22267.
  68. Liao, Y., Li, B., Chen, H., Ma, Y., Wang, F., Huang, L.,. & Yue, P. (2025). Stimuli-responsive mesoporous silica nanoplatforms for smart antibacterial therapies: From single to combination strategies. Journal of Controlled Release, 378, 60-91.
  69. Liu, J., Huang, T., Xu, Z., Mao, Y., Soteyome, T., Liu, G.,. & Seneviratne, G. (2023a). Sub-MIC streptomycin and tetracycline enhanced Staphylococcus aureus Guangzhou-SAU749 biofilm formation, an in-depth study on transcriptomics. Biofilm, 6, 100156.
  70. Murray, C. J., Ikuta, K. S., Sharara, F., Swetschinski, L., Aguilar, G. R., Gray, A.,. & Tasak, N. (2022). Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. The Lancet, 399(10325), 629-655.
  71. Naghavi, M., Vollset, S. E., Ikuta, K. S., Swetschinski, L. R., Gray, A. P., Wool, E. E.,. & Dekker, D. M. (2024). Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. The Lancet, 404(10459), 1199-1226.
  72. Nazir, A., Nazir, A., Zuhair, V., Aman, S., Sadiq, S. U. R., Hasan, A. H.,. & Bulimbe, D. B. (2025). The global challenge of antimicrobial resistance: mechanisms, case studies, and mitigation approaches. Health Science Reports, 8(7), e71077.
  73. Neščáková, Z., Zheng, K., Liverani, L., Nawaz, Q., Galusková, D., Kaňková, H.,. & Boccaccini, A. R. (2019). Multifunctional zinc ion doped sol–gel derived mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Bioactive Materials, 4, 312-321.
  74. Zheng, K., Fan, Y., Torre, E., Balasubramanian, P., Taccardi, N., Cassinelli, C.,. & Boccaccini, A. R. (2020). Incorporation of boron in mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles reduces inflammatory response and delays osteogenic differentiation. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 37(7), 2000054.