Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

CAN ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY VIDEOS SHARED ON YOUTUBE BE USED AS PATIENT EDUCATION TOOLS? A QUALITY CONTROL STUDY

Sayfa
239–244
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Therefore, we recommend that YouTube® videos should not be used as patient education tools for endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Today, the internet is the initial resource of health information for people who are worried about their health condition.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The headings of the first 50 videos on YouTube® associated with endoscopic lumbar discectomy were obtained and simultaneously evaluated by two spine surgeons.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore, we recommend that YouTube® videos should not be used as patient education tools for endoscopic lumbar discectomy.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Today, the internet is the initial resource of health information for people who are worried about their health condition. For this reason, it is crucial to clarify the reliability and content correctness of online medical videos. Therefore, this current study aimed to investigate the reliability and correctness of videos associated with endoscopic lumbar discectomy on YouTube®. Materials and Methods: We conducted a search on YouTube® using the keywords “endoscopic lumbar discectomy”. The headings of the first 50 videos on YouTube® associated with endoscopic lumbar discectomy were obtained and simultaneously evaluated by two spine surgeons. We excluded from our analysis videos with advertisements and video in a language other than English. We evaluated the videos using the DISCERN and JAMA scores and video power index. Results: The average number of views per video was 95,954. Most of the video contents were surgical techniques and general information. The average video length was 7.67 minutes. The average DISCERN and JAMA scores were determined as 30.2 and 1.94, respectively. According to the average DISCERN scores, 38% of the videos were evaluated as very poor, 44% as poor, 16% as average and 2% of as good in terms of video reliability. Conclusion: Generally, the reliability of the videos uploaded on YouTube® associated with endoscopic lumbar discectomy was “poor” or “very poor”. Therefore, we recommend that YouTube® videos should not be used as patient education tools for endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERKEN, H. Y., KATAR, S. (2020). CAN ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY VIDEOS SHARED ON YOUTUBE BE USED AS PATIENT EDUCATION TOOLS? A QUALITY CONTROL STUDY. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 239–244. https://ajindex.com/articles/166674

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Gokcen HB, Gumussuyu G. A Quality analysis of disc herniation videos on YouTube®. World Neurosurg. 2019;S1878-8750:30246-3
  2. Fischer J, Geurts J, Valderrabano V, Hügle T. Educational quality of YouTube videos on knee arthrocentesis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2013;19:373-6
  3. Ho M, Stothers L, Lazare D, Tsang B, Macnab A. Evaluation of educational content of YouTube videos relating to neurogenic bladder and intermittent catheterization. Can Urol Assoc. 2015;9:320-54
  4. Mukewar S, Mani P, Wu X, Lopez R, Shen B. YouTube and inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7:392-402
  5. Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A. Medical YouTube videos and methods of evaluation: literature review. JMIR Med Educ. 2018;12;4:e3
  6. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine. 2018;43:E1334-9
  7. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:105-11
  8. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;16;277:1244-5
  9. Ferhatoglu MF, Kartal A, Ekici U, Gurkan A. Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the ınformation in sleeve gastrectomy videos shared on open access video sharing platform YouTube. Obes Surg. 2019;29:1477-84
  10. Fat MJ, Doja A, Barrowman N, Sell E. YouTube videos as a teaching tool and patient resource for infantile spasms. J Child Neurol. 2011;26:804-9
  11. Ovenden CD, Brooks FM. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion YouTube videos as a source of patient education. Asian Spine J. 2018;12:987-91
  12. Haymes AT, Harries V. How to stop a nosebleed’: an assessment of the quality of epistaxis treatment advice on YouTube. J Laryngol Otol. 2016;130:749-54
  13. Tartaglione JP, Rosenbaum AJ, Abousayed M, Hushmendy SF, DiPreta JA. Evaluating the quality, accuracy and readability of online resources pertaining to hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Spec. 2016; 9:17-23
  14. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king?: an objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;18;8:e82469
  15. Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, Algazy JI, Kravitz RL, Broder MS, et al. Health information on the internet: accessibility, quality, and r