KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Kent Akademisi / 2026 / Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Medya ve Yapay Zekâ Kullanımına İlişkin Değerlendirmeleri: Hitit Üniversitesi Örneği

University Students’ Evaluations of Social Media and Artificial Intelligence Use: The Case of Hitit University

Leyla Erat(Hitit Üniversitesi)0000-0002-7136-2493
Mihriban Cindiloğlu Demirer(HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3530-2215
Sayfa
1–33
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, öğrencilerin en çok Instagram, WhatsApp, YouTube ve X platformlarını kullandığını göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmanın amacı, Hitit Üniversitesinde öğrenim gören üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal medya (SM) ve yapay zekâ (YZ) kullanım düzeylerini, kullanım amaçlarını ve bu teknolojilere yönelik değerlendirmelerini ortaya koymak; ayrıca bu kullanım biçimlerinin sınıf düzeyi, cinsiyet ve fakülte değişkenlerine göre nasıl farklılaştığını belirlemektir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Araştırmanın örneklemini farklı fakülte ve sınıf düzeylerinde öğrenim gören 516 lisans öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, öğrencilerin en çok Instagram, WhatsApp, YouTube ve X platformlarını kullandığını göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Dijital Beceriler · Sosyal Medya · Teknoloji Kullanımı

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Hitit Üniversitesinde öğrenim gören üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal medya (SM) ve yapay zekâ (YZ) kullanım düzeylerini, kullanım amaçlarını ve bu teknolojilere yönelik değerlendirmelerini ortaya koymak; ayrıca bu kullanım biçimlerinin sınıf düzeyi, cinsiyet ve fakülte değişkenlerine göre nasıl farklılaştığını belirlemektir. Dijitalleşmenin hızla arttığı günümüzde üniversite öğrencilerinin bu teknolojileri hangi amaçlarla ve ne düzeyde kullandıklarının anlaşılması hem eğitim süreçleri hem de dijital becerilerin geliştirilmesi açısından önem taşımaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemini farklı fakülte ve sınıf düzeylerinde öğrenim gören 516 lisans öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Veriler anket yöntemiyle toplanmış ve SPSS paket programı kullanılarak analizler yapılmıştır. Sınıflama ölçeği ile elde edilen verilerle yapılan analizlerde frekans ve yüzde dağılımları incelenmiştir. Bu dağılımlardan elde edilen sonuçlar sınıf düzeyi, cinsiyet ve fakülte değişkenlerine göre çapraz tablolarda karşılaştırmalı olarak gösterilmiştir. Bulgular, öğrencilerin en çok Instagram, WhatsApp, YouTube ve X platformlarını kullandığını göstermektedir. Günlük SM kullanım süresi büyük ölçüde 2-5 saat aralığında yoğunlaşmaktadır. YZ araçları içinde açık ara en fazla kullanılan uygulama ChatGPT’dir ve öğrenciler YZ’yi en çok ödev hazırlama amacıyla kullandıklarını belirtmişlerdir. Bunu kodlama-yazılım, proje geliştirme ve soru-cevap amaçlı kullanım izlemektedir. Cinsiyete göre yapılan karşılaştırmalarda her iki grubun da YZ’yi faydalı bulduğu; ancak erkek öğrencilerin YZ araçlarını daha işlevsel değerlendirdiği görülmektedir. Sonuç olarak çalışma, üniversite öğrencilerinin SM ve YZ teknolojilerini hem akademik hem sosyal yaşamlarında aktif biçimde kullandıklarını ortaya koymakta ve yükseköğretimde dijital becerilerin güçlendirilmesine yönelik öneriler sunmaktadır.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the levels and purposes of social media (SM) and artificial intelligence (AI) use among undergraduate students at Hitit University, as well as their evaluations of these technologies, and to determine how these usage patterns differ across grade level, gender, and faculty. Understanding the extent to which university students use these technologies and for what purposes in an era of rapid digitalization is essential for both educational processes and the development of digital competencies. The sample of the research consists of 516 undergraduate students from various faculties and grade levels. Data were collected through a questionnaire and analyzed using the SPSS software package. Frequency and percentage distributions derived from categorical data were examined, and the results were comparatively presented in cross-tabulations based on grade level, gender, and faculty variables. The findings indicate that students primarily use Instagram, WhatsApp, YouTube, and X. Daily SM usage is largely concentrated within the 2-5 hour range. Among AI tools, ChatGPT is by far the most frequently used application, and students report using AI mainly for preparing assignments, followed by coding–software tasks, project development, and question–answer purposes. Gender-based comparisons reveal that while both groups consider AI useful, male students tend to evaluate AI tools as more functional. Overall, the study demonstrates that university students actively use SM and AI technologies in both their academic and social lives and offers recommendations for enhancing digital competencies within higher education.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Erat, L., Demirer, M. C. (2026). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Medya ve Yapay Zekâ Kullanımına İlişkin Değerlendirmeleri: Hitit Üniversitesi Örneği. Kent Akademisi, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1759678

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (70)

  1. Adeshola, I., & Adepoju, A. P. (2024). The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6159-6172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253858
  2. Alsancak, F., Ozpolat, A., Akyuz, I., & Degirmenci, G. (2022). Social media addiction among Turkish university students during the pandemic: A descriptive study. ADDICTA: The Turkish Journal on Addictions. https://doi.org/10.5152/addicta.2022.21077
  3. Alshanqiti, A., Alharbi, O. A., Ismaeel, D. M., & Abuanq, L. (2023). Social media usage and academic performance among medical students in Medina, Saudi Arabia. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 14, 1401-1412. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S434150
  4. Altin, M., & Kıvrak, A. (2018). The social media addiction among Turkish university students. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i12.3452
  5. Auxier, B., & Anderson, M. (2021). Social media use in 2021. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/
  6. Balcı, Ş., & Demir, Y. (2018). Sosyal medya kullanımı ile mutluluk düzeyi arasındaki ilişki: Üniversite gençliği üzerine bir inceleme. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, (71), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.9761/JASSS7762
  7. Balcı, Ş., & Gölcü, A. (2016). Türkiye’de üniversite öğrencileri arasında facebook bağımlılığı: “Selçuk Üniversitesi örneği”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, (34), 255-278.
  8. Binjwair, A. A. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Students’ journey through opportunities, challenges, and the horizons of academic transformation. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2589495. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2589495
  9. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
  10. Bozorgpanah, H., Moradi, G., Bahrami, P., Noori, E., Ezati, M., Soleimani, N., & Yousefi, F. (2021). Investigating social media statistics of usage and its determinant factors in students of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences in 2018: A cross-sectional study. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-257862/v1
  11. Cetinkaya, A., Kırık, A., & Gündüz, U. (2021). Fear of missing out and problematic social media use: A research among university students in Turkey. AJIT-e Online Academic Journal of Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.5824/ajite.2021.04.001.x
  12. Chandhok, G.A., & Nithya, V. (2019). Short-lived content, a social media platform it’s purpose, perspective of generation Z. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(12), 761-768.
  13. Çelik, B., Uzunboylu, H., & Demirbaş-Çelik, N. (2023). Higher education students’ social media platform preferences for educational purposes. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.491551
  14. Dabija, D.-C., Babut, R., Dinu, V., & Lugojan, M. I. (2017). Cross-generational analysis of information searching based on social media in Romania. Transformations in Business & Economics, 16(41), 248-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70449-4_10
  15. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  16. Deng, N., Liu, E. J., & Zhai, X. (2025). Understanding university students’ use of generative AI: The roles of demographics and personality traits. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.02863
  17. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., et al. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  18. Fajt, B., & Schiller, E. (2025). ChatGPT in academia: University students’ attitudes towards the use of CHATGPT and plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09603-5
  19. Fošner, A. (2024). University students’ attitudes and perceptions towards aı tools: Implications for sustainable educational practices. Sustainability, 16(19), 8668. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198668
  20. Georgopoulou, M. S., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2025). Digital literacy in higher education: Examining university students’ competence in online information practices. Computers, 14(12), 528. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14120528
  21. Global Statshot Report, (2024, October). Digital 2024 October Global Statshot Report. https://www.guvenliweb.org.tr/dokuman-detay2/we-are-social-dijital-2024-ekim-raporu
  22. Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri, Felsefe-Yöntem-Analiz. Seçkin Yayınevi.
  23. Hajam, K., & Gahir, S. (2024). Unveiling the attitudes of university students toward artificial intelligence. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52, 335-345. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231225920
  24. Hasanein A. M. & Sobaih A.E.E. (2023). Drivers and consequences of ChatGPT Use in higher education: Key stakeholder perspectives. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Nov 9;13(11), 2599-2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13110181.
  25. Hirabayashi, S., Jain, R., Jurković, N., & Wu, G. (2024). Harvard undergraduate survey on generative AI. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.00833
  26. Hmoud, M., Swaity, H., Hamad, N., Karram, O., & Daher, W.M. (2024). Higher education students' task motivation in the generative artificial intelligence context: The case of ChatGPT. Computer Science, Education Inf., 15, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15010033
  27. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
  28. Hu, B., Mao, Y., & Kim, K. J. (2023). How social anxiety leads to problematic use of conversational AI: The roles of loneliness, rumination, and mind perception. Computers in Human Behavior, 145, 107760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107760.
  29. Jalil, S., Rafi, S., LaToza, T. D., & Moran, K. (2023). ChatGPT and software testing education: Promises & perils (arXiv:2302.03287). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.03287
  30. Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F.,. & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  31. Kaya, İ., & Çiçek, H. (2023). Z kuşağı kişilerin sosyal medya kullanımlarının işsizlik kaygısına etkisi: Adalet Meslek Lisesi örneği. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Dergisi, 2(1), 15-27.
  32. Keleş, P., & Aydın, S. (2021). University students’ perceptions about artificial intelligence. Education 3-13, 9, 212-220. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9is1-may.4014
  33. Kırık, A., Cetinkaya, A., & Gündüz, U. (2021). Fear of missing out and problematic social media use among university students in Turkey: Correlates and further analysis. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202107.0173.v1
  34. Kircaburun, K., & Griffiths, M. D. (2018). Instagram addiction and the Big Five of personality: The mediating role of self-liking. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(1), 158-170. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.15
  35. Koyuturk, C., Yavari, M., Theophilou, E., Bursic, S., Donabauer, G., Telari, A., Testa, A., Boiano, R., Gabbiadini, A., Hernandez-Leo, D., Ruskov, M., & Ognibene, D. (2023). Developing effective educational Chatbots with ChatGPT prompts: insights from preliminary tests in a case study on social media literacy (with appendix). http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.10645.
  36. Köse, Ö., & Dogan, A. (2019). The relationship between social media addiction and self-esteem among Turkish university students. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions. https://doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2019.6.1.0036
  37. Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3), 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030311
  38. Liu, D., He, B., Feng, R., Huang, X., & Liu, G. (2024). How social media sharing drives consumption intention: The role of social media envy and social comparison orientation. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01627-7
  39. Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW), 1-29.
  40. Luckin, R., & Holmes, W; (2016) Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. UCL Knowledge Lab: London, UK.
  41. Lukose, J. M., & Agbeyangi, A. O. (2025). Is social media hindering or helping academic performance? A case study of Walter Sisulu University Buffalo City Campus. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.03611
  42. Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & education, 56(2), 429-440.
  43. McDonald, M., Johri,A., Ali,A., & Aayushi Hingle Collier, A. H. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines, Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100121.
  44. Naseri, A., & Elliott, G. (2011). Role of demographics, social connectedness and prior internet experience in adoption of online shopping: Applications for direct marketing. Journal of Targeting Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 19(2), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2011.9
  45. Pew Research Center. (2023). Teens, social media and technology 2023. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/07/10/10-facts-about-teens-and-social-media/ Erişim tarihi: 04.12.2025
  46. Ray, P.P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003.
  47. Rubin, A. M. (2009). Uses-and-gratifications perspective on media effects. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 165–184). Routledge.
  48. Sarıoğlu, E. B., & Özgen, E. (2018). Z kuşağının sosyal medya kullanım alışkanlıkları üzerine bir çalışma. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(60), 1067-1081. http://dx.doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2018.2856
  49. Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., Lim, W. M., Yang, X., & Khan, Q. R. (2024). Artificial intelligence and social media on academic performance and mental well-being: Student Perceptions of positive impact in the age of smart learning. Heliyon, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29523
  50. Shen, J. (2019). Social-media use and academic performance among undergraduates in Biology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 47(6), 615–619. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21293
  51. Smutny, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020). Chatbots for learning: A review. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 3581–3605.
  52. Stöhr, C., Ou, A. W., & Malmström, H. (2024). Perceptions and usage of AI Chatbots among students in higher education across genders, academic levels and fields of study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100259
  53. Sublime, J., & Renna, I. (2024). Is ChatGPT massively used by students nowadays? A survey on the use of large language models such as ChatGPT in educational settings. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.17486
  54. Şimşek, A., Elciyar, K., & Kızılhan, T. (2017). A comparative study on social media addiction of high school and university students. Contemporary Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.554452
  55. Tellhed, U., Björklund, F., & Kallio Strand, K. (2023). Tech-savvy men and caring women: Middle school students’ gender stereotypes predict interest in tech-education. Sex Roles, 88, 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01353-1
  56. TİSK (Türkiye İşveren Sendikaları Konfederasyonu), (2025). Dijital 2025: Türkiye Raporu. https://www.tisk.org.tr/dokuman/dijital-2025-turkiye.pdf
  57. Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the Devil is my guardian angel: Chatgpt as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
  58. Torun, E. (2020). Educational use of social media in higher education: Gender and social networking sites as the predictors of consuming, creating, and sharing content. Acta Educationis Generalis, 10, 112 - 132. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2020-0013
  59. Tunga, Y., Geriş, A., & Çelik, B. (2025). Artificial intelligence myths: Prevalence among Turkish university students and comparative analysis of ChatGPT responses. Participatory Educational Research, 12(3), 292-311. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.45.12.3
  60. UBYS, (2025, 03 Mart). Hitit Üniversitesi Öğrenci Sayıları. https://ubys.hitit.edu.tr/BIP/BusinessIntelligence/Students/TotalStudents
  61. UBYS, (2025, 10 Haziran). Yükseköğretim Yazısı. https://ubys.hitit.edu.tr/ERMS/Inbox/Record/Index?#
  62. Ursavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., İslamoğlu, H., Bakır-Yalçın, E., & Cukurova, M. (2025). Rethinking the importance of social norms in generative AI adoption: Investigating the acceptance and use of generative AI among higher education students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00535-z
  63. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(2), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00368.x
  64. Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362–369.
  65. Yan, Y., Wu, B., Pi, J., & Zhang, X. (2025). Perceptions of AI in higher education: Insights from students at a top-tier Chinese university. Education Sciences, 15(6), 735. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060735
  66. Yılmaz, C., Erdem, R., & Uygun, L. (2024). Artificial intelligence knowledge, attitudes and application perspectives of undergraduate and specialty students of faculty of dentistry in Turkey: An online survey research. BMC Medical Education, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06106-6
  67. YZ Politikaları Derneği (YZPD), (2021). Zafer Küçükşabanoğlu, Volkan Kılıç, Şebnem Özdemir. AIPA Gelecek Araştırması: Toplumda Yapay Zekâ Algısı kantitatif araştırma raporu. Yapay Zekâ Politikaları Derneği (AIPA), Kuantum Araştırma 2021. https://aipaturkey.org/uploads/f/ic/yapay-zeka-politikalari-aipa-dernegi-gelecek-arastirmasi-toplumda-yapay-zeka-algisi_1.pdf
  68. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education -where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  69. Zhu, Z. (2024). Poverty and freedom: Philosophical reflection on the future development of artificial intelligence. AI & SOCIETY, 40(5), 3487-3494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02073-0
  70. Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F.,. & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274