Dergiler / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2025 / Volume: 35 Issue: 4

Comparison of The Contribution of Rotational Land Management of Inheritance and Ownership Systems to Agricultural Sustainability

Nurdin Mapppa(Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar)0000-0001-6542-8671
Ardi Rumallang(Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar)0000-0002-1025-3277
Akbar Akbar(Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar)0000-0002-7860-8871
Jumiati Jumiati(Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar)0000-0001-7677-9151
Saleh Molla(Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar)0009-0004-1807-1461
Hamed Norolla(Omdurman Islamic University, Omdurman Abuseeds, Main Campus, Khartoum, Al-Khartoum, P.O. Box 382, Postal Code 14415, Sudan)0009-0000-2633-6846
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-25
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In terms of ecology, the legacy system maintains the biodiversity and quality of the forest.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:There are several ways of controlling agricultural land, especially in Indonesia, such as the inheritance system, ownership.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The results showed that the inheritance system has a B/C ratio of 2.1 and an R/C ratio of 3.1, which indicates that this system is economically profitable and provides wider employment because it involves many heirs.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In terms of ecology, the legacy system maintains the biodiversity and quality of the forest.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Agriculture · Inheritance · Sustainability

Abstract

There are several ways of controlling agricultural land, especially in Indonesia, such as the inheritance system, ownership. This land tenure is closely related to the sustainability of agriculture in economic, social and ecological aspects. Especially in Tombolopao District, Gowa Regency, farmers carry out rotating land management patterns and ownership systems. This study aims to analyze the comparison of the contribution of rotating agricultural management patterns of inheritance systems with ownership systems to agricultural sustainability from economic, social and ecological aspects. Determination of informants is done by snowball, data collection techniques through interviews, data analysis using qualitative and quantitative descriptive analysis. The results showed that the inheritance system has a B/C ratio of 2.1 and an R/C ratio of 3.1, which indicates that this system is economically profitable and provides wider employment because it involves many heirs. From a social aspect, the inheritance system emphasizes mutual cooperation and knowledge transfer between generations, which strengthens social ties. On the other hand, the proprietary system has a B/C ratio of 1.9 and an R/C ratio of 2.9, indicating that it is also economically viable but with lower efficiency. The proprietary system provides full management flexibility for the owner, but tends to lack in social contribution. In terms of ecology, the legacy system maintains the biodiversity and quality of the forest.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Mapppa, N., Rumallang, A., Akbar, A., Jumiati, J., Molla, S., Norolla, H. (2025). Comparison of The Contribution of Rotational Land Management of Inheritance and Ownership Systems to Agricultural Sustainability. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 35 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1604541

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (37)

  1. Agnoletti, M., & Santoro, A. (2022). Agricultural heritage systems and agrobiodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 31(10), 2231–2241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02460-3
  2. Ahmed, A., Sara Taha, A., Sundas, R. Q., & Man-Qun, W. (2021). Heavy metals and pesticides toxicity in agricultural soil and plants: Ecological risks and human health ımplications. Toxics, 9, 42.
  3. Ahmed, H., & Ahmed, M. (2023). Influencing factors on adoption of modern agricultural technology in developing economy countries. Developing Country Studies, March. https://doi.org/10.7176/dcs/13-2-01
  4. Al-Shammary, A. A. G., Al-Shihmani, L. S. S., Fernández-Gálvez, J., & Caballero-Calvo, A. (2024). Optimizing sustainable agriculture: A comprehensive review of agronomic practices and their impacts on soil attributes. Journal of Environmental Management, 364(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121487
  5. Aslam, M., & Fazal, S. (2025). Exploring the impact of land fragmentation on the performance of agriculture: a systematic review. Discover Agriculture, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-025-00207-6
  6. Bahasoan, H. (2011). Pola penguasaan lahan pertanian dan pengaruhnya terhadap kinerja usahatani padi sawah di kabupaten buru. Media Trend, 6(1), 50–71.
  7. Bahrami-Rad, D. (2021). Keeping it in the family: Female inheritance, inmarriage, and the status of women. Journal of Development Economics, 153(August), 102714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102714
  8. Borras, S. M. (2022). The Oxford Handbook of Land Politics (S. M. Borras Jr. & J. C. Franco (eds.)). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197618646.001.0001
  9. Chari, A., Liu, E. M., Wang, S. Y., & Wang, Y. (2021). Property Rights, land misallocation, and agricultural efficiency in China. The Review of Economic Studies, 88(4), 1831–1862. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaa072
  10. Dhillon, R., & Moncur, Q. (2023). Small-Scale Farming: A Review of Challenges and Potential Opportunities Offered by Technological Advancements. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115478
  11. Fuetsch, E. (2022). Innovation in family farms: The Roles of the market, the family, and farm performance. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 32(2), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.53703/001C.31714
  12. Gooden, J., & ‘t Sas-Rolfes, M. (2020). A review of critical perspectives on private land conservation in academic literature. Ambio, 49(5), 1019–1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01258-y
  13. Hu, X., Lin, X., Wen, G., Zhou, Y., Zhou, H., Lin, S., & Yue, D. (2024). The impact of cultivated land fragmentation on farmers’ ecological efficiency of cultivated land use based on the moderating and mediating effects of the cultivated land management scale. Land, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101628
  14. Ji, D., Shi, X., Luo, X., & Ma, X. (2023). The Impact of Intergenerational Inheritance on the Scale of Farmland Management in the Context of Aging: Evidence from Eastern China. Land, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/land12081496
  15. Khadka, R., & Karki, L. (2025). A review analysis of heirs property challenges in sustainable land use. Land, 14(10), 1–29.
  16. Lugo-Espinosa, G., Acevedo-Ortiz, M. A., Aquino-Bolaños, T., Ortiz-Hernández, Y. D., Ortiz-Hernández, F. E., Pérez-Pacheco, R., & López-Cruz, J. Y. (2024). Cultural Heritage, Migration, and Land Use Transformation in San José Chiltepec, Oaxaca. Land, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101658
  17. Muhie, S. H. (2022). Novel approaches and practices to sustainable agriculture. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 10(November), 100446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100446
  18. Ntihinyurwa, P. D., de Vries, W. T., Chigbu, U. E., & Dukwiyimpuhwe, P. A. (2019). The positive impacts of farm land fragmentation in Rwanda. Land Use Policy, 81(June 2018), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.005
  19. Nurdin. (2018). Shifting land management pattern and sustainable agriculture (study case of tombolopao district, gowa regency, south sulawesi). Unhas University.
  20. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  21. Pasaribu, M., & Istriningsih. (2020). Pengaruh status kepemilikan lahan terhadap pendapatan petani berlahan sempit di kabupaten ındramayu dan purwakarta. Jurnal Pengkajian Dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian, 23(2), 187–198.
  22. Pretty, J. (2008). Agricultural sustainability: Concepts, principles and evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1491), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2163
  23. Rumallang, A., Akbar, A., Saleh, M. I., & Ratnawati, R. (2023). Pola usahatani sayur di desa erelembang kecamatan tombolopao kabupaten gowa. Agrikultura, 34(2), 325. https://doi.org/10.24198/agrikultura.v34i2.47384
  24. Rutledge, P. B., & Hogg, J. L. C. (2020). In‐depth interviews. The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology, April, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0019
  25. Samim, S.A., Deng, X., Chandio, A.A. et al. Heterogeneous impacts of land tenure on the adoption intensity of climate-smart agricultural practices in small-scale farming in Afghanistan. Environ Dev Sustain (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06062-1
  26. Sekar, S., Balakrishnan, S., Soundarraj, P. L., Kannan, P., Mishra, A., Dhanasekaran, P., & Mishra, I. (2023). Assessing the impact of agrotourism initiatives on rural development and community-based agricultural management. Journal of Environment and Bio-Science, 37(02), 155. https://doi.org/10.59467/jebs.2023.37.155
  27. Sudomo, A., Leksono, B., Tata, H. L., Rahayu, A. A. D., Umroni, A., Rianawati, H., Asmaliyah, Krisnawati, Setyayudi, A., Utomo, M. M. B., Pieter, L. A. G., Wresta, A., Indrajaya, Y., Rahman, S. A., & Baral, H. (2023). Can agroforestry contribute to food and livelihood security for Indonesia’s smallholders in the climate change era? Agriculture (Switzerland), 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101896
  28. Terán-Samaniego, K., Robles-Parra, J. M., Vargas-Arispuro, I., Martínez-Téllez, M. Á., Garza-Lagler, M. C., Félix-Gurrlola, D., Maycotte-de la Peña, M. L., Tafolla-Arellano, J. C., García-Figueroa, J. A., & Espinoza-López, P. C. (2025). Agroecology and sustainable agriculture: Conceptual challenges and opportunities—A systematic literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17051805
  29. van der Ploeg, J. D. (2025). Land in the Chayanovian Tradition. In S. M. Borras Jr. & J. C. Franco (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Land Politics (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197618646.013.11
  30. Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
  31. Wegerif, M., Coulibaly, M., & Ouedraogo, H. (2025). Land tenure governance in the first decades of the 21st century: Progress, challenges, and lessons from 18 countries. Land, 14(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14040671
  32. Yang, B., & He, J. (2021). Global land grabbing: A critical review of case studies across the world. Land, 10(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030324
  33. Yusriadi, Y. (2024). Building rural resilience: food security through tourism and agricultural development in Indonesia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 40(3), 319–322.
  34. Zainal Arifin, Suparwata, D. O., Syamsu Rijal, & Ramlan, W. (2023). Revitalisasi Ekonomi Pedesaan melalui Pertanian Berkelanjutan dan Agroekologi. Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science, 2(09), 761–769. https://doi.org/10.58812/jmws.v2i09.627
  35. Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Hu, Y., Wang, W., & Mao, X. (2025). Analysis of the evolution of non-agriculturization arable land use pattern and its driving mechanisms. Land, 14(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14050968
  36. Zhi, Q., Yuying, J., Tong, H., Yingshuang, L., Xinliang, X., & Jun, Y. (2022). Land use change simulation: progress, challenges, and prospects. Shengtai Xuebao, 45(13), 5165–5176. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb202106201639
  37. Yusriadi, Y. (2024). Building rural resilience: food security through tourism and agricultural development in Indonesia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 40(3), 319–322.