Dergiler / Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Technology use in archeology and historical building research: A citation, bibliographic coupling, and document analysis

Sayfa
141–157
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Therefore, the findings of this study may contribute to picture the research trend and gaps in the field as a guide to future research.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The historic heritage composes the national identity, which is a reflection of social and cultural human activities in the past.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Since technology increases the efficiency of construction projects, the use of technology in conservation management may have a positive impact on PCR projects.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore, the findings of this study may contribute to picture the research trend and gaps in the field as a guide to future research.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The historic heritage composes the national identity, which is a reflection of social and cultural human activities in the past. Historical buildings and archaeological sites have been exposed to many damages over time. Preservation, conservation, and restoration (PCR) projects are costly in nature as they require a high degree of expertise and know-how. Since technology increases the efficiency of construction projects, the use of technology in conservation management may have a positive impact on PCR projects. The aim of this paper is to understand the use of technology in the archeology and historical building research (AHBR) in different countries and reveal gaps and trends in the research field. This study has adopted a holistic approach with bibliometric search and scientometric analysis such as document-based citation analysis, country-based citation analysis, and country-based bibliographic coupling analysis of scholarly research that use technology in the AHBR. Data about technology use in the AHBR were collected through an examination of articles that were selected from the Scopus database. Findings demonstrate that the use of technology in the AHBR makes it possible to obtain accurate information to manage the design, visualization, and construction throughout the life cycle of the historical building to increase efficiency in PCR projects. Technological developments contribute to the transfer of cultural heritage to technological platforms for sustainable and efficient PCR of built heritage environment. Therefore, the findings of this study may contribute to picture the research trend and gaps in the field as a guide to future research.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OZTURK, G. B., OZEN, B. (2020). Technology use in archeology and historical building research: A citation, bibliographic coupling, and document analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 141–157. https://ajindex.com/articles/166592

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Albourae AT, Armenakis C, Kyan M (2017). Architectural heritage visualization using interactive technologies. International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives 42(2W5): 7-13 DOI:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-7- 2017 [2] Rodrigues F, Teixeira J, Matos R, Rodrigues H (2019). Development of a web application for historical building management through BIM technology. Advances in Civil Engineering: 1-15 DOI:10.1155/2019/9872736 [3] ICOMOS The Valletta Principles for the Safeguarding and Management of Historic Cities, Towns and Urban Areas (2011). http://www.icomos.org.tr/Dosyalar/ICOMOSTR_ en0593034001536912260.pdf [4] Yilmaz HM, Yakar M, Gulec SA, Dulgerler ON (2007). Importance of digital close-range photogrammetry in documentation of cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage 8(4): 428-433 DOI:10.1016/j.culher.2007.07.004 [5] Saygi G, Agugiaro G, Hamamcloǧlu-Turan M, Remondino F (2013). Evaluation of GIS and BIM roles for the information management of historical buildings. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 2(5/W1): 283-288 DOI:10.5194/isprsannals-II-5- W1-283-2013 [6] ICOMOS Charter for The Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage (1990). http://www.icomos.org.tr/Dosyalar/ICOMOSTR_ en0574331001536913919.pdf [7] Sánchez-Yustos P, Diez-Martín F, DomínguezRodrigo M, Duque J, Fraile C, Díaz I (2017). The origin of the Acheulean. Techno-functional study of the FLK W lithic record (Olduvai, Tanzania). PLoS One 12(8): 12. DOI:10.5194/isprsannals-II5-W1-283-2013 [8] Chase AF, Chase DZ, Fisher CT, Leisz SJ, Weishampel JF (2012). Geospatial revolution and remote sensing LiDAR in mesoamerican archaeology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 109(32): 12916-12921 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1205198109 [9] Sato M, Gaber A, Yokota Y (2012). 3-Dimensional GPR applied to archeological survey and mitigation of natural disastres. International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS): 3218-3221 DOI:10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6350739 [10] Jerardino A, Navarro R (2008). Shell morphometry of seven limpet species from coastal shell middens in southern Africa. Journal of Archeological Science 35(4): 1023-1029 DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.07.004 [11] Howey MCL, Sullivan B., Tallant, Kopple R (2016). Detecting precontact anthropogenic microtopographic features in a forested landscape with lidar: A case study from the Upper Great Lakes Region