KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Afet ve Risk Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 22

Afet Lojistiği Depolarında Stok Önceliklendirmesinde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yaklaşımı

A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Stock Prioritization in Disaster Logistics Warehouses

İlknur Yardımcı Coşkun(MALTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7183-6142
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-07-13
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, afet sonrası ilk 72 saatte temel yaşam ihtiyaçlarının önceliklendirilmesinin hayati olduğunu göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Afet lojistiği, afet sonrası dönemde insani yardım malzemelerinin doğru türde, doğru miktarda ve doğru zamanda ulaştırılmasını hedefleyen stratejik bir süreçtir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bulgular, afet sonrası ilk 72 saatte temel yaşam ihtiyaçlarının önceliklendirilmesinin hayati olduğunu göstermektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu yönüyle çalışma hem akademik literatüre hem de afet yönetimi uygulamalarına önemli katkılar sağlamaktadır.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Afet Lojistiği · AHP · Çok Kriterli Karar Verme

Özet

Afet lojistiği, afet sonrası dönemde insani yardım malzemelerinin doğru türde, doğru miktarda ve doğru zamanda ulaştırılmasını hedefleyen stratejik bir süreçtir. Ancak afet koşullarında kısıtlı kaynak, zaman baskısı ve talep belirsizliği nedeniyle tüm malzemelerin aynı anda temini ve dağıtımı mümkün olmamaktadır. Bu durum, yardım malzemelerinin hangi türlerinin öncelikli olarak stoklanması gerektiği sorusunu kritik bir karar problemine dönüştürmektedir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, afet lojistiğinde sınırlı kaynak koşullarında yardım malzemelerinin stok önceliklendirmesini sistematik biçimde belirlemektir. Bu amaçla, Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) ve TOPSIS yöntemleri bütünleşik biçimde kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada belirlenen kriterler (kritiklik, talep sıklığı, bozulabilirlik, maliyet, hacim/taşınabilirlik ve yeniden temin süresi) afet lojistiği literatüründe öne çıkan karar boyutlarına dayanmaktadır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre içme suyu ve kuru gıda en yüksek öncelikli malzemeler olurken, hijyen kiti ve battaniye orta düzeyde önem taşımaktadır. Bulgular, afet sonrası ilk 72 saatte temel yaşam ihtiyaçlarının önceliklendirilmesinin hayati olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca çalışma, çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinin afet lojistiği planlamasında etkin biçimde kullanılabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır. Önerilen bütünleşik model, afet yönetiminde kaynak tahsisini optimize eden ve karar vericilere sayısal temelli bir destek mekanizması sunan uygulanabilir bir yaklaşım geliştirmektedir. Bu yönüyle çalışma hem akademik literatüre hem de afet yönetimi uygulamalarına önemli katkılar sağlamaktadır.

Abstract

Disaster logistics is a strategic process that aims to ensure the timely and efficient delivery of humanitarian relief items after disasters. However, limited resources, time pressure, infrastructure disruptions, and demand uncertainty make it impossible to procure and distribute all relief materials simultaneously. Therefore, determining which items should be prioritized for stockpiling becomes a critical decision problem in disaster management. The main objective of this study is to systematically prioritize humanitarian relief items in disaster logistics warehouses under resource-constrained conditions. For this purpose, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) were integrated within a multi-criteria decision-making framework. The evaluation criteria, including criticality, demand frequency, perishability, cost, volume/transportability, and replenishment lead time, were derived from the disaster logistics literature. The analysis results indicate that drinking water and dry food are the highest-priority items, while hygiene kits and blankets have moderate priority levels. The findings emphasize the importance of prioritizing essential survival needs during the first 72 hours after a disaster. The proposed integrated model provides a practical and data-driven decision support framework for optimizing resource allocation in disaster logistics and contributes to both academic literature and disaster management practices.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Coşkun, İ. Y. (2026). Afet Lojistiği Depolarında Stok Önceliklendirmesinde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yaklaşımı. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, Sayı: 22. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1821033

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (49)

  1. Aksoy, L., & Coşkun, İ. Y. (2025). Afetlerde aydınlatma, haberleşme ve enerji ihtiyacının tek noktadan karşılanması için şebeke ve direk tasarımı. Doğal Afetler ve Çevre Dergisi, 11(1), 206-219.
  2. Akwafuo, S. E., Mikler, A. R., & Ihinegbu, C. (2022, April). Data-driven depot pre-positioning model and location-routing algorithm for management of disasters and disease outbreaks. In Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 681-687).
  3. Balcik, B., & Beamon, B. M. (2008). Facility location in humanitarian relief. International Journal of logistics, 11(2), 101-121.
  4. Balcik, B., Beamon, B. M., & Smilowitz, K. (2008). Last mile distribution in humanitarian relief. Journal of intelligent transportation systems, 12(2), 51-63.
  5. Barahona, F., Ettl, M., Petrik, M., & Rimshnick, P. M. (2013, December). Agile logistics simulation and optimization for managing disaster responses. In 2013 Winter Simulations Conference (WSC) (pp. 3340-3351). IEEE.
  6. Blecken, A., Danne, C., Dangelmaier, W., Rottkemper, B., & Hellingrath, B. (2010, January). Optimal stock relocation under uncertainty in post-disaster humanitarian operations. In 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
  7. Caunhye, A. M., Nie, X., & Pokharel, S. (2012). Optimization models in emergency logistics: A literature review. Socio-economic planning sciences, 46(1), 4-13.
  8. Charles, A., Lauras, M., & Van Wassenhove, L. (2010). A model to define and assess the agility of supply chains: building on humanitarian experience. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 40(8/9), 722-741.
  9. Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy sets and systems, 114(1), 1-9.
  10. Connelly, E. B., Lambert, J. H., & Thekdi, S. A. (2016). Robust investments in humanitarian logistics and supply chains for disaster resilience and sustainable communities. Natural Hazards Review, 17(1), 04015017.
  11. Helbig, C., Schrijvers, D., & Hool, A. (2021). Selecting and prioritizing material resources by criticality assessments. One Earth, 4(3), 339-345.
  12. Holguín-Veras, J., Jaller, M., Van Wassenhove, L. N., Pérez, N., & Wachtendorf, T. (2012). On the unique features of post-disaster humanitarian logistics. Journal of Operations Management, 30(7-8), 494-506.
  13. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey (pp. 58-191). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  14. Jahre, M., Jensen, L. M., & Listou, T. (2009). Theory development in humanitarian logistics: a framework and three cases. Management Research News, 32(11), 1008-1023.
  15. Kovács, G., & Spens, K. M. (2011). Trends and developments in humanitarian logistics–a gap analysis. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 41(1), 32-45.
  16. Küçük, B. (2022). Afet Planlamasında Afet Lojistiği Örnek Uygulamalar. Akademisyen Kitabevi.
  17. Küçük, B., & Coşkun, İ. Y. (2025). Afet lojistiği’nde araç rotalama probleminin optimizasyonu: İstanbul ili Anadolu Yakası örneği. Maltepe Üniversitesi Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 1(1), 53-64.
  18. Lee, W. S., Kim, B. S., & Opit, P. F. (2014). A stock pre-positioning model to maximize the total expected relief demand of disaster areas. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, 13(3), 297-303.
  19. Lei, F. (2007, November). Dynamic multi-objective emergency relief logistics: A decision support system framework. In 2007 IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services (pp. 779-783). IEEE.
  20. Lin, Y. H., Batta, R., Rogerson, P. A., Blatt, A., & Flanigan, M. (2011). A logistics model for emergency supply of critical items in the aftermath of a disaster. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 45(4), 132-145.
  21. Liu, H., Wu, Z., & Yu, L. (2024). Optimization of emergency stockpile siting: A review of models, influencing factors, and future research directions. J. Eng. Manag. Syst. Eng, 3(4), 226-235.
  22. Lodree Jr, E. J., & Taskin, S. (2008). An insurance risk management framework for disaster relief and supply chain disruption inventory planning. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(5), 674-684.
  23. Ma, K., Yan, H., Ye, Y., Zhou, D., & Ma, D. (2022). Critical Decision‐Making Issues in Disaster Relief Supply Management: A Review. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022(1), 1105839.
  24. Manopiniwes, W., & Irohara, T. (2017). Stochastic optimisation model for integrated decisions on relief supply chains: preparedness for disaster response. International Journal of Production Research, 55(4), 979-996.
  25. Matam, Y., & M, H. (2025). Development of a relief distribution model for emergency logistics. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management.
  26. Mishra, B. K., Adhikari, T. N., Dahal, K., & Pervez, Z. (2018, December). Priority-index based multi-priority relief logistics scheduling with greedy heuristic search. In 2018 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Disaster Management (ICT-DM) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
  27. Mishra, B. K., Dahal, K., & Pervez, Z. (2017, January). Post-disaster relief distribution using a two phase bounded heuristic approach. In 2017 7th international conference on cloud computing, data science & engineering-confluence (pp. 143-148). IEEE.
  28. Oktarina, R., Bahagia, S. N., Diawati, L., Pribadi, K. S., & Okazaki, K. (2013, February). Disaster Logistics: How To Estimate The Emergency Goods To Support Earthquake Relief Operations. In Proceedings of The International Conference on Tourism, Transport, and Logistics 2013, Paris (pp. 221-225).
  29. Opit, P. F., & Nakade, K. (2015, December). Emergency response model of stock-prepositioning with transportation constraints. In 2015 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM) (pp. 239-243). IEEE.
  30. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European journal of operational research, 156(2), 445-455.
  31. Ozbay, K., & Ozguven, E. E. (2007). Stochastic humanitarian inventory control model for disaster planning. Transportation Research Record, 2022(1), 63-75.
  32. Özdamar, L., & Ertem, M. A. (2015). Models, solutions and enabling technologies in humanitarian logistics. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(1), 55-65.
  33. Pettit, S., & Beresford, A. (2009). Critical success factors in the context of humanitarian aid supply chains. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 39(6), 450-468.
  34. Qezelbash-Chamak, J., Badamchizadeh, S., & Seifi, A. (2024). A fast-response mathematical programming approach for delivering disaster relief goods: an earthquake case study. Transportation Letters, 16(9), 1091-1114.
  35. Ransikarbum, K., & Mason, S. J. (2016). Goal programming-based post-disaster decision making for integrated relief distribution and early-stage network restoration. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 324-341.
  36. Rawls, C. G., & Turnquist, M. A. (2010). Pre-positioning of emergency supplies for disaster response. Transportation research part B: Methodological, 44(4), 521-534.
  37. Rivera-Royero, D., Galindo, G., & Yie-Pinedo, R. (2016). A dynamic model for disaster response considering prioritized demand points. Socio-economic planning sciences, 55, 59-75.
  38. Rivera-Royero, D., Galindo, G., & Yie-Pinedo, R. (2020). Planning the delivery of relief supplies upon the occurrence of a natural disaster while considering the assembly process of the relief kits. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 69, 100682.
  39. Rodriguez, N. P. (2011). Inventory allocation models for post-disaster humanitarian logistics with explicit consideration of deprivation costs. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
  40. Saaty, T. (2006) ‘Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes’, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 168, No. 2, pp.557–570.
  41. Saaty, T. L. (2013). Analytic hierarchy process. In Encyclopedia of operations research and management science (pp. 52-64). Springer, Boston, MA.
  42. Sarraf, A. Z., Mohaghar, A., & Bazargani, H. (2013). Developing TOPSIS method using statistical normalization for selecting knowledge management strategies. Journal of industrial engineering and management, 6(4), 860-875.
  43. Sheu, J. B. (2010). Dynamic relief-demand management for emergency logistics operations under large-scale disasters. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(1), 1-17.
  44. Timor, M. (2010) Yöneylem Araştırması, Türkmen Kitabevi, İstanbul.
  45. Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. CRC press.
  46. Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational research Society, 57(5), 475-489.
  47. Velasquez, G. A., Mayorga, M. E., & Cruz, E. A. (2019). Prepositioning inventory for disasters: a robust and equitable model. Or Spectrum, 41(3), 757-785.
  48. Wang, Y., Dong, Z. S., & Hu, S. (2021). A stochastic prepositioning model for distribution of disaster supplies considering lateral transshipment. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 74, 100930.
  49. Wu, Q., & Zhuang, W. (2022, November). Emergency material distribution considering priority and uncertain needs. In Seventh International Conference on Electromechanical Control Technology and Transportation (ICECTT 2022) (Vol. 12302, pp. 961-965). SPIE.