KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / TOJSAT / 2026 / Volume: 1 Issue: 3

INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT: SOCIOECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE

Mehmet Karpuzcu
Şermin Delipınar
Dergi
TOJSAT
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2016-07-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This paper presents that watershed management integrates various aspects of forestry, agriculture, ecology, soils, water use and other sciences to provide guidelines for the choosing appropriate IWM alternatives within the social and economic context.Addressing social and economic aspects is an essential part of evaluating the effects of IWM

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Integrated watershed management (IWM) is becoming increasingly important in such a country where the economy depends predominately on agriculture, but there are also fast-growing urban populations that depend on water and food supplies on an unprecedented scale and attention is shifting to overall socio-economic benefit along with better water and soil conservation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The ever-increasing pressure on the natural resources is further increased the intensity by the even faster economic growth the country has witnessed in the past decades.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This paper presents that watershed management integrates various aspects of forestry, agriculture, ecology, soils, water use and other sciences to provide guidelines for the choosing appropriate IWM alternatives within the social and economic context.Addressing social and economic aspects is an essential part of evaluating the effects of IWM
🔬Tür:Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:IVM · social · economic

Abstract

Integrated watershed management (IWM) is becoming increasingly important in such a country where the economy depends predominately on agriculture, but there are also fast-growing urban populations that depend on water and food supplies on an unprecedented scale and attention is shifting to overall socio-economic benefit along with better water and soil conservation. The ever-increasing pressure on the natural resources is further increased the intensity by the even faster economic growth the country has witnessed in the past decades. Unprecedented economic activities in areas such as agriculture, industry, power, and communication, are affecting land-use patterns in many ways. The aim of this paper is to emphasize the importance of the effective IWM, to point out the relations between its components and to realize on beneficiaries in any watershed. In particular, social, economic, environmental, and resource systems are all considered in order to improve the applicability of IWM approach. This paper presents that watershed management integrates various aspects of forestry, agriculture, ecology, soils, water use and other sciences to provide guidelines for the choosing appropriate IWM alternatives within the social and economic context.Addressing social and economic aspects is an essential part of evaluating the effects of IWM

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Karpuzcu, M., Delipınar, Ş. (2016). INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT: SOCIOECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE. TOJSAT, Volume: 1 Issue: 3. https://ajindex.com/articles/1660430

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (21)

  1. Achouri M., Tennyson L., Upadhyay K. And WhiteR. (2003). Preparing for the Next Generatıon of Watershed Management Programmes and Projects, Proceedings of the Asian Regional Workshop, Kathmandu, Nepal, ASIA, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2005
  2. Baloch, M.A. and Tanık, A. (2008). Development of an Integrated Watershed Management strategy for Resource Conservation in Balochistan Province of Pakistan. Desalination 226 (2008) 38–46.Presented at the 10th IWA International Specialized Conference on Diffuse Pollution and Sustainable BasinManagement, Istanbul, Turkey, 18–22 September 2006.
  3. Blomquist, W. & Schlager, E. (2005). Political Pitfalls of Integrated Watershed Management. Society & Natural Resources,18: 2, 101 — 117
  4. Bouwer, H. (2000). Integrated water management: emerging issues and challenge. Agricultural Water Management 45 (2000) 217±228,USA
  5. Crichlow M. (2001). Watershed Management Coastal Zone/Island Systems Management CDCM Professional Development Training. The University of the West Indies
  6. Davenport, T.E. (2003). Watershed project management guide. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.
  7. Gooch, G.D. and Stålnacke, P. (2003). Integrated Scenarıos - The key for Successful Water and River Basin Management?. Diffuse Pollution Conference, Dublin
  8. Joshi PK, Vasudha P, Shiferaw B, Wani SP, Bouma J & Scott C. (2004). Socioeconomic and policy research on watershed management in India: Synthesis of past experiences and needs for future research. Global Theme on Agroecosystems Report no. 7.Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 88 pp.
  9. Kerr, J.(2007). Watershed Management: Lessons from Common Property Theory. International Journal of the Commons. Vol 1, pp. 89-109 Publisher: Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving Services for IASC
  10. Kotru,R. and GTZ team leader (2005). Watershed management experıences ın gtz-supported projects ın ındıa. IGCEDP, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, India. Proceedings of the Asian Regional Workshop on Watershed Management Ch.8.
  11. Liu Y., Guo H.C., Zhang Z.,Wang LJ., Dai.Y., Fan Y. (2007). An Optimization Method Based on Scenario Analysis for Watershed Management Under Uncertainty’, Environ Manage 39:678–690
  12. Lixian W.(2002). Theory and Practice of Watershed Management in China. Beijing Forestry university, 100083, Beijin. 12th ISCO Conference
  13. Mansoor, B.(2008). Socio-economic characterization of communıties in integrated watershed development, a MS Thesis, Arid Agriculture University_ Department of Agri. Economics & Economics_Faculty of Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  14. Nafo I.(2010). Integrative socio-economic planning of measures in the context of the European Water Framework Directive, Sino-GermanWater Management Symposium 2010, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
  15. Paleyan, A. A. and Wacangan, V. T. (2008). Itogon Integrated Watershed Management Project: an assessment. Research Journal, Volume XVI - 2008 Edition
  16. Prabhakar K., Lath K.L. and Rao A.P. (2010). Watershed Programme: Impact on Socio-agricultural and Socio-economic Spheres of the Farmers. © Kamla-Raj, J Agri Sci. 1(1): 31-37
  17. Stinchfield H. M., Koontz L, and Sexton NR (2009). Social and Economic Considerations for Coastal and Watershed Restoration in the Puget Sound, Washington: A Literature Review Open-File Report 2009–1079 U.S.
  18. Tennyson L., (2003). Revıew and assessment of watershed management strategıes and approaches. Preparing for the Next Generatıon of Watershed Management Programmes and Projects, Proceedings of the Asian Regional Workshop, Ch2. P.19-39
  19. Wang G.Y., and Innes J. L. (2005). Watershed Sustainability: Strategic and Tactical Level Assessment in the Min River Watershed, China. Environmental Informatics Archives. Volume 3, 76 – 83
  20. Winnegge R. (2005). Participatory Approach in Integrated Watershed Management. FWU, Vol. 3, Topics of Integrated Watershed Management – Proceedings
  21. Liu Y., Guo H.C., Zhang Z.,Wang LJ., Dai.Y., Fan Y. (2007). An Optimization Method Based on Scenario Analysis for Watershed Management Under Uncertainty’, Environ Manage 39:678–690