Dergiler / Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

Clinical and Prosthetic Features of Female Patients with Acquired Amputation

Edinilmiş Amputasyonu Olan Kadın Hastaların Klinik ve Prostetik Özellikleri

Sayfa
66–70
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Therefore, to reduce the prevalance of limb loss public education, increased awareness of potential causes and the enforcement of overall safety regulations must be public awareness about patential amputation should be increased and general safety regulations should be applied.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Limb loss frequently leads to permanent disability and the information on the characteristics of female amputees is inadequate.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: Evaluation was made 55 female patients with loss of 62 limbs.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore, to reduce the prevalance of limb loss public education, increased awareness of potential causes and the enforcement of overall safety regulations must be public awareness about patential amputation should be increased and general safety regulations should be applied.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Limb loss frequently leads to permanent disability and the information on the characteristics of female amputees is inadequate. This paper the clinical and demographic features of female patients with limb loss to assist the preventive studies. Material and Methods: Patients admitted to the rehabilitation center for prosthesis are included to this retrospective study. A chart review was performed to identify clinical and prosthetic data including the age (current and at the time of injury), time since injury, etiology, amputation side and level and currently used prosthetics type. Results: Evaluation was made 55 female patients with loss of 62 limbs. Amputations was most frequently observed between 21-30 years (25.5%). The lower limb amputation was more than the upper limb amputation (43 vs 13). 41 of 62 amputations were at the transtibial or transfemoral levels (25 and 16 amputations, respectively). Amputations due to trauma was accounted for the vast majority (61.8%). The primary mechanisms of traumatic injury were pedestrian (29.1%) and road traffic accidents (18.2%). %). The leading cause of non-traumatic amputation was vascular disease (20%), followed by infection (10.9%). The modular transtibial prosthesis (35.4%) and the myoelectrically-controlled arm prosthesis (17.7%) were the most commonly used type among female patients. Conclusion: The majority of the amputations were caused by preventable conditions. Therefore, to reduce the prevalance of limb loss public education, increased awareness of potential causes and the enforcement of overall safety regulations must be public awareness about patential amputation should be increased and general safety regulations should be applied.

Abstract

Amaç: Ekstremite kaybı sıklıkla kalıcı dizabiliteye neden olur ve kadın amputelerin özellikleriyle ilgili veriler yetersizdir. Bu çalışmada bayan ampute hastaların klinik ve demografik özellikleri sunularak amputasyonu önleyici çalışmalara yardımcı olmak amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışmaya rehabilitasyon merkezine protez için başvuran hastalar alınmıştır. Yaş (şimdiki ve olay zamanındaki), olay sonrası geçen süre, etyoloji, amputasyon tarafı ve seviyesi ile şu anda kullanmakta oldukları protez tipleri gibi klinik ve prostetik verilere ulaşabilmek için dosya taraması yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Toplam 55 hastanın 62 amputasyonu değerlendirmeye alındı. Amputasyonun en sık gözlendiği yaş grubu 21-30 yaş (%25,5) idi. Alt ekstremite amputasyonları üst ekstremiteden daha fazlaydı (43/13). 62 amputasyonun 41’inde seviye transtibial ve transfemoraldi (sırasıyla 25 ve 16 amputasyon). En sık amputasyon nedenlerini travma kaynaklı amputasyonlar oluşturmaktaydı (%61,8). Yaya (%29,1) ve araç kazaları (%18,2) travmatik nedenlerin önde gelen iki sebebiydi. Non-travmatik amputasyonların en sık görülen tipleri damar hastalıkları (%20) ve infeksiyondu (%10,9). Modüler diz altı protezi (%35,4) ve myoelektrik kontrollü üst ekstremite protezleri (%17,7) en sık kullanılan protez tipleriydi. Sonuç: Amputasyonların büyük çoğunluğu önlenebilir nedenlerden kaynaklanmaktaydı. Bu yüzden, ampute sıklığını azaltmak için eğitim ile potansiyel amputasyon nedenleri hakkında bilinçlilik arttırılmalı ve genel güvenlik düzenlemeleri uygulanmalıdır.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEMİR, Y., AYDEMİR, K., GÜZELKÜÇÜK, Ü., TAN, A. K. (2017). Clinical and Prosthetic Features of Female Patients with Acquired Amputation. Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 66–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/166011

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Kejlaa GH. The social and economic outcome after upper limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1992;16(1):25-31. Geertzen J, van der Linde H, Rosenbrand K, Conradi M, Deckers J, Koning J, et al. Dutch evidence-based guidelines for amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremity: Amputation surgery and postoperative management. Part 1. Prosthet Orthot Int 2015;39(5):351-60.
  2. Kim YC, Park CI, Kim DY, Kim TS, Shin JC. Statistical analysis of amputations and trends in Korea. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996;20(2):88- 95. Kauzlarić N, Kauzlarić KS, Kolundzić R. Prosthetic rehabilitation of persons with lower limp amputations due to tumor. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2007;16(3):238-43.
  3. Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89(3):422-9.
  4. Ephraim PL, Dillingham TR, Sector M, Pezzin LE, Mackenzie EJ. Epidemiology of limb loss and congenital limb deficiency: a review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84(5): 747-61.
  5. Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States. South Med J 2002;95(8):875-83.
  6. Singh R, Hunter J, Philip A, Tyson S. Gender differences in amputation outcome. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30(2):122-5.
  7. Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, Mackenzie EJ. Racial differences in the incidence of limb loss secondary to peripheral vascular disease: a population-based study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83(9):1252-7.
  8. Blair SN, Brodney S. Effects of physical inactivity and obesity on morbidity and mortality: current evidence and research issues. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999;11(11 Suppl):S646-62. Bolen JC, Rhodes L, Powell-Griner EE, Bland SD, Holtzman D. State-specific prevalence of selected health behaviors, by race and ethnicity--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1997. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 2000;49(2):1-60.
  9. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004;27(5):1047-53.
  10. Mayfield JA, Reiber GE, Nelson RG, Greene T. Do foot examinations reduce the risk of diabetic amputation? J Fam Pract 2000;49(6): 499-504.
  11. Larsson J, Apelqvist J, Agardh C, Stenström A. Decreasing incidence of major amputation in diabetic patients: a consequence of a multidisciplinary foot care team approach? Diabet Med 1995;12(9):770-6.
  12. Rith-Najarian SJ, Reiber GE. Prevention of foot problems in pers