Dergiler / Tasarım + Kuram / 2026 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: 45

İstanbul’daki Mimarların Döngüsel Yapı Farkındalıkları

Awareness of Architects in Istanbul Towards Circular Building

Ömer Şükrü Deniz(MİMAR SİNAN GÜZEL SANATLAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ)
Zeynep Melis Oğuz(MİMAR SİNAN GÜZEL SANATLAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0001-7403-149X
Sayfa
59–82
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Elde edilen veriler, analiz edilmiş, değerlendirilmiş, ortaya çıkan bulgular; sayılar, yüzdeler ve puanlar biçiminde sunulmuştur.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Döngüsel Ekonomi (DE), sürdürülemez Doğrusal Ekonomi (yap-kullan-at) yaklaşımına karşı alternatif modellerden biri olarak kabul edilmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Mimarlar, DE modelinin inşaat sektöründe uygulanmasına destek sağlayabilecek stratejik aktörlerden biridir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Elde edilen veriler, analiz edilmiş, değerlendirilmiş, ortaya çıkan bulgular; sayılar, yüzdeler ve puanlar biçiminde sunulmuştur.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Döngüsel Ekonomi · Döngüsel Yapı · Mimarların Farkındalığı

Özet

Döngüsel Ekonomi (DE), sürdürülemez Doğrusal Ekonomi (yap-kullan-at) yaklaşımına karşı alternatif modellerden biri olarak kabul edilmektedir. Mimarlar, DE modelinin inşaat sektöründe uygulanmasına destek sağlayabilecek stratejik aktörlerden biridir. Döngüsel Yapı (DY) DE ilkeleri ve stratejileri doğrultusunda tasarlanan ve inşa edilen yapı türüdür. Bu çalışmada, “İstanbul’daki mimarların Döngüsel Yapı’ya yönelik farkındalıkları nedir?” sorusu araştırmanın ana sorusu olarak belirlenmiş, bu soru kapsamında üç alt sorunun cevapları araştırılmıştır: “Mimarların DY’ye yönelik bilgi düzeyi nedir?”, “Mimarların DY’ye yönelik tutum düzeyi nedir?” ve “Mimarların DY‘ye yönelik davranış düzeyi nedir?”. Araştırmada betimsel nicel anket yöntemi uygulanmış, anket formunda mimarların; “DY’ye yönelik bilgi birikimi”, “DY’ye yönelik tutumları” ve “DY’ye yönelik davranışları” olmak üzere üç farklı grupta sorular oluşturulmuştur. Mimarlara çevrimiçi anket formu gönderilmiş, ankete 120 mimar cevap vermiştir. Elde edilen veriler, analiz edilmiş, değerlendirilmiş, ortaya çıkan bulgular; sayılar, yüzdeler ve puanlar biçiminde sunulmuştur. Araştırma bulguları, mimarların DY kavramları hakkındaki bilgi birikimlerinin düşük düzeyde, DY ilkelerini uygulama davranışlarının orta sıklıkta ve DY kavramlarına ve ilkelerine yönelik tutumlarının yüksek önemde olduğunu göstermiştir. Araştırma sonucunda İstanbul’daki mimarların, DE ve DY hakkında yeterli bilgi sahibi olmadığı, DE ve DY konularını çok önemli ve gerekli gördüğü ve bu konularda eğitim almak istediği anlaşılmıştır. Ancak DY ilkelerini uygulama deneyimleri sorularına verdikleri cevaplarda çelişkiler bulunmuştur. Araştırma bulguları, mimarların DY tasarımı ve uygulaması ile ilgili yetersizliklerinin görülmesine yardımcı olabilir ve Türkiye’de yapı ve yapım sektörü kapsamında DE ve DY konusunda yapılacak araştırmalara referans sağlayabilir.

Abstract

Circular Economy (CE) is a restorative and regenerative model that maintains materials at their maximum value by creating tech¬nical and biological cycles, thus minimizing raw material inputs, waste generation, carbon dioxide emissions, and energy losses. CE is recognized as one of the alternative models to the unsustainable Linear Economy (build-use-dispose) approach. A Circular Building (CB) is a type of building designed and constructed in accordance with the principles and strategies of CE. Architects are one of the strategic actors that can support the implementation of the CE model in the construction sector. The ability of architects to design and implement in accordance with the principles and strategies of CE and CB and to make the right decisions depends on the adequacy of their awareness (knowledge, attitude and behavioral levels) on these issues. In the literature review, it has been observed that issues such as CE, demolition, waste management, reuse, recycling in the construction sector have been investi¬gated, but there is no detailed study on the CB awareness of architects. For this reason, this study was conducted to measure the awareness level of architects towards CB and to identify the deficiencies and inadequacies… …In the research, a descriptive quantitative survey method was applied to collect comprehensive data on the current situation. The sample size of the online survey was 220, the population of architects was 27000. The question forms used in the survey were pre¬pared by analyzing the data from face-to-face interviews with architects and comprehensive literature reviews. In the preparation of the question forms, it was prioritized to measure the awareness (knowledge, attitude, behavior) levels of CE and CB principles and concepts that are important in the whole life cycle of a building. The answers were analyzed, evaluated and scored. The survey questions were measured on a 5-point Likert scale, with the highest (ideal) score being 5. The findings are presented in the form of numbers, percentages and scores. As a result of the measurement of the knowledge level, it was observed that the respondents could not exactly explain their knowledge about CB concepts. This result shows that architects need to improve their knowledge about CB, which is a new par¬adigm, in order to design and implement in accordance with CB. As a result of the measurement of attitudes towards the impor¬tance of CB concepts and principles, it is seen that architects attach great importance to CB concepts and principles and their atti-tudes towards them are very positive. In addition, it is understood that architects generally want to be educated on CB and have a positive attitude towards the education to be given on this subject. As a result of the measurement of preferences for applying CB principles, it is revealed that architects mostly prefer to apply CB principles in their architectural projects. As a result of the meas¬urement of their experience in applying CB principles, about half of the architects participating in the survey stated that they had experience in applying CB principles in at least one of their projects. However, it is a contradiction that although it was found that architects do not have sufficient knowledge about CB concepts, their preferences and experience in applying CB principles do not seem to be low. It can be said that this contradiction may be caused by the lack of adequate knowledge of the survey participants about CB, not properly understanding the questions asked on this subject, and giving different answers than what is the case. The findings of the study show that the architects have low level of knowledge about CB concepts, medium frequency of CB prin¬ciples implementation behaviors and high attitude level towards CB concepts and principles. From these findings, it is understood that architects do not have adequate knowledge about CB concepts, but they think that CB is very important and necessary, and they want to receive education about CB. The fact that CB concepts and principles are considered very important by architects can be presented as a reason for the introduction and development of CB in the construction sector. As a result of the research, it is determined that there is a clear need to improve the knowledge of architects in Istanbul regarding CE and CB and to increase their practical experience. In addition, the research results also show the importance of including CE and CB related courses in the curricula of educational organizations and providing more effective support from public organizations to improve the knowledge and experience of architects towards CB….

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Deniz, Ö. Ş., Oğuz, Z. M. (2026). İstanbul’daki Mimarların Döngüsel Yapı Farkındalıkları. Tasarım + Kuram, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 45, 59–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/1659148

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (93)

  1. Adams, K., Osmani, M., Thorpe, T., Thornback, J. (2017). Circular economy in construction: current awareness, challenges and enablers. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Waste and Resource Management, 170, p.15–24. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.16.00011.
  2. Addis, B. (2006). Building with Reclaimed Components and Materials: A Design Handbook for Reuse and Recycling. Taylor & Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849770637.
  3. Alivojvodic, V., Kokalj, F. (2024). Drivers and Barriers for the Adoption of Circular Economy Principles towards Efficient Resource Utilisation. Sustainability, 16, 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031317.
  4. Amudjie, J., Agyekum, K., Adinyira, E., Amos-Abanyie, S., Botchway, E.A. (2023b). Implementing the principles of circular economy in the construction industry: exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of strategies. Construction Innovation, 1471-4175. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-10-2022-0270.
  5. Amudjie, J., Agyekum, K., Adinyira, E., Amos-Abanyie, S., Kumah, V.M.A. (2023a). Awareness and practice of the principles of circular economy among built environment professionals. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 140-156. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-11-2021-0135.
  6. Anastasiades, K., Blom, J., Buyle, M., Audenaert, A. (2020). Translating the circular economy to bridge construction: Lessons learned from a critical literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 117, p.109522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109522.
  7. Archaya, D., Boyd, R., Finch, O., (2018). From principles to practices: First steps towards a circular built environment. ARUP, Ellen MacArthur Foundation. https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/first-steps-towards-a-circular-built-environment.
  8. Arup. (2016). The Circular Economy in the Built Environment. Arup Publication: London, UK. https://www.arup.com/globalassets/downloads/insights/cirular-economy-in-the-built-environment.pdf.
  9. Avdiushchenko, A. (2018). Toward a circular economy regional monitoring framework for European regions: conceptual approach. Sustainability, Vol. 10, pp. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124398.
  10. Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan skala psikologi (2nd ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  11. Bayraktaroğlu, S., Soylu, Y. (2024). Circular economy awareness and motivations in the furniture industry: İnegöl as a microcosm of global south dynamics. Furnit Wood Mat Res J, 7(1), 38-53. https://doi.org/10.33725/mamad.1474192
  12. Benachio, G.L.F., Freitas, M.C.D., Tavares, S.F. (2020). Circular economy in the construction industry: a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121046.
  13. Bradley, R., Jawahir, I.S., Badurdeen, F., Rouch, K. (2018). A total life cycle cost model (TLCCM) for the circular economy and its application to post-recovery resource allocation. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Aug;135:141–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.017.
  14. Bressanelli, G., Saccani, N., Perona, M., Baccanelli, I. (2020). Towards Circular Economy in the Household Appliance Industry: An Overview of Cases. Resources, 9, 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9110128.
  15. Cheshire, D. (2016). Building Revolutions: Applying the circular economy to the built environment. RIBA Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429346712.
  16. Chick, A., Micklethwaite, P. (2004). Specifying recycled: understanding UK architects’ and designers’ practices and experience. Design Studies, 25/3, 251-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2003.10.009.
  17. Conroy, K., J., Riggio, M., Knowles, C. (2019). Perceptions of the environmental and health impacts of wood product use in buildings: A survey among architects on the United States West Coast. BioProducts Business, 4(9). https://biobus.swst.org/bpbj/index.php/bpbj/article/view/52/93.
  18. Çiçekçi, H. A. (2023). Döngüsel yapılar: Döngüsel yapılar üzerine öğrenci pratikleri üzerinden bir değerlendirme. In XIII. Uluslararası Sinan Sempozyumu (pp. 85-96). Trakya Üniversitesi.
  19. Çimen, Ö. (2021). Construction and built environment in circular economy: A comprehensive literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 305, 127180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127180.
  20. Dadzoe, F., Michael, A., Duah, D.Y.A., Adesi, M. (2022). Towards a circular economy: a knowledge-attitude gap between demand and supply-side operators on green building construction in Ghana. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 763-779. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-03-2022-0048.
  21. De Pascale A., Arbolino R., Szopik-Depczyńska K., Limosani M., Ioppolo G. (2021). A systematic review for measuring circular economy: The 61 indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 124942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124942.
  22. Desing, H., Brunner, D., Takacs, F., Nahrath, S., Frankenberger, K., Hischier, R. (2020). A circular economy within the planetary boundaries: Towards a resourcebased, systemic approach. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 155, 104673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104673.
  23. Dewi, R., Arfani, J.W., Herawan, D. (2022). A Study Of Circular Economy Awareness In University Students: The Assessment Of Knowledge, Attitude And Behavior. Journal of World Trade Studies, 7 (1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22146/jwts.v7i1.3702.
  24. Eberhardt, L., Birkved, M., Birgisdottir, H. (2020). Building design and construction strategies for a circular economy. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, Vol.18, No. 2, 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2020.1781588.
  25. Ecorys (2014). Resource Efficiency in the Building Sector: Final report. Ecorys, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Copenhagen Resource Institute. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/document/download/88f298c5-d17c-4d78-852e-fbf972e836d6_en?filename=Resource%20efficiency%20in%20the%20building%20sector_0.pdf.
  26. Ekins, P., Domenech, T., Drummond, P., Bleischwitz, R., Hughes, N. and Lotti, L. (2019). The Circular Economy: What, Why, How and Where. Background paper for an OECD/EC Workshop on 5 July 2019within the workshop series “Managing environmental and energy transitions for regions and cities”, Paris. https://www.fluidice.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Ekins-2019-Circular-Economy-What-Why-How-Where.pdf.
  27. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF) (2013). Towards the circular economy, Opportunities for the consumer goods sector. https://emf.thirdlight.com/file/24/qzvD2i1qVnZjTMqzpI2qI32rGA/Towards%20the%20circular%20economy%20Vol.%202%3A%20opportunities%20for%20the%20consumer%20goods%20sector.pdf.
  28. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF) (2015). Towards the circular economy: Business rationale for an accelerated transition. https://archive.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/TCE_Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation_26-Nov-2015.pdf.
  29. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF) (2021). Circular economy glossary. https://emf.thirdlight.com/file/24/BGMwzd_BG.iZsrLBGtqmBgvFbCK/%5BEN%5D%20Circular%20Economy%20Glossary%20%7C%2030-09-21.pdf.
  30. Esa, M. R., Edward, W.A.S.E.S., Halog, A. (2021). Assessment on the Circular Economy for Waste Minimization in the Construction Industry. Built Environment Journal, Vol. 18. No. 2, 11-22. https://doi.org/10.24191/bej.v18i2.13695.
  31. European Commission (2020). Changing how we produce and consume: New Circular Economy Action Plan shows the way to a climate neutral, competitive economy of empowered consumers. Opgehaald van EC Europa. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/api/files/document/print/en/ip_20_420/IP_20_420_EN.pdf. Eurostat (2020). Waste Statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Waste_statistics#Total_waste_generation.
  32. Finch, G., Marriage, G., Pelosi, A., Gjerde, M. (2021). Building envelope systems for the circular economy; Evaluation parameters, current performance and key challenges. Sustainable Cities and Society, 64, 102561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102561.
  33. Forghani, R., Sher, W., Kanjanabootra, S., Totoev, Y., (2018). The Attitudes of Demolition Contractors to Reusing Building Components: A Study in New South Wales, Australia. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7 (3), 364-370. https://ecsdev.org/ojs/index.php/ejsd/article/view/735/730.
  34. Garusinghe, G.D.A.U., Perera, B.A.K.S., Weerapperuma, U.S. (2023). Integrating Circular Economy Principles in Modular Construction to Enhance Sustainability. Sustainability, 15, 11730. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11730.
  35. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M. and Hultink, E.J. (2017). The circular economy – a new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 143, pp. 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.
  36. Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007.
  37. Guerra, B.C. Leite, F. (2021). Circular Economy in the construction industry: An overview of United States stakeholders' awareness, major challenges, and enablers. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, V. 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105617.
  38. Guy, B. Shell, S., Esherick, H. (2006). Design for deconstruction and material reuse. Design for deconstruction and material reuse, Proceedings of the CIB Task Group 39, CIB Publication 272, p.189-209. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB926.pdf.
  39. Hao, JL., Yu, S., Tang, X., Wu W. (2022). Determinants of workers' pro-environmental behavior towards enhancing construction waste management: Contributing to China's circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 369, 133265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133265.
  40. Harju, C., Lähtinen K. (2022). Consumers' Consciousness for Sustainable Consumption and Their Perceptions of Wooden Building Product Quality. Forest Products Journal, 72(3), 115-169. https://doi.org/10.13073/FPJ-D-22-00014.
  41. Hartini, S., Wicaksono, P.A., Rizal, M.D. Hamdi, M. (2021). Integration lean manufacturing and 6R to reduce wood waste in furniture company toward circular economy. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1072, 012067. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/1072/1/012067.
  42. Hild, P. (2023). The Circular Economy and Circular Building Practices in Luxembourg. Circular Economy and Sustainability, V.3, p.1963–1988.
  43. Hossain, M. U., Ng, S. T., Antwi-Afari, P., Amor, B. (2020). Circular economy and the construction industry: Existing trends, challenges and prospective framework for sustainable construction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 130, p. 109948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-023-00256-3.
  44. Jawahir, I.S., Bradley, R. (2016). Technological Elements of Circular Economy and the Principles of 6R-Based Closed-loop Material Flow in Sustainable Manufacturing, Procedia CIRP, 40, 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.067.
  45. Jayawardane, A.K.W. (1994). Are we aware of the extent of wastage on our building construction sites? Engineer, 20, 2, p. 41-5.
  46. Joensuu, T., Edelman, H., Saari, A. (2020). Circular economy practices in the built environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124215.
  47. Khalfan, M., Noor, M., Maqsood, T., Alshanbri, N., Rahmani, F., Sagoo, A. (2015). Perceptions Towards Sustainable Construction Amongst Construction Contractors in State of Victoria, Australia. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3, P.940-947. https://www.joebm.com/papers/313-BM00030.pdf.
  48. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 127, p.221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005.
  49. Krausmann, F., Schandl, H., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Jackson, T. (2017). Material Flow Accounting: Measuring Global Material Use for Sustainable Development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42, p. 647-675. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060726.
  50. Kulatunga, U., Amaratunga, D., Haigh, R. Rameezdeen, R. (2006). Attitudes and Perceptions of Construction Workforce on Construction Waste in Sri Lanka. Management of Environmental Quality,17, 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830610639440.
  51. Leising, E., Quist, J., Bocken, N. (2018). Circular Economy in the Building Sector: Three Cases and a Collaboration Tool. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 976–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.010.
  52. Liu Y., Bai, Y. (2014). An exploration of firms’ awareness and behavior of developing circular economy: An empirical research in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 87, 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.04.002.
  53. Mat'ová, H., Kaputa, V. (2018). Attitudes of active and upcoming architects towards wood: The case study in Slovakia. Acta Facultatis Xylologiae, 60(2), 197-207. https://df.tuzvo.sk/sites/default/files/19-02-18.pdf.
  54. Morganti, P., Coltelli, M.B. (2021). An Introduction to the Circular Economy. Nova Science Publishers, NewYork.
  55. Mrad, C., Ribeiro, L.F. (2022). A Review of Europe’s Circular Economy in the Building Sector. Sustainability, 14, 14211. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114211.
  56. Mugge, R. (2017). A consumer’s perspective on the circular economy. In J. Chapman (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Product Design, p. 374-390) Routledge - Taylor & Francis Group.
  57. Munaro, M. R., Tavares, S. F., Bragança, L. (2020). Towards circular and more sustainable buildings: a systematic literature review on the circular economy in the built environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121134.
  58. Murray, A., Skene, K., Haynes, K. (2017). The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369–380. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2.
  59. Mykkänen, J., Repo, P. (2021). Consumer perspectives on arranging circular economy in Finland. Sustainability: Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17-1, P.349-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1977500.
  60. Norouzi, M., Chafer, M., Cabeza L. F., Jimenez, L., Boer, D. (2021). Circular economy in the building and construction sector: A scientific evolution analysis. Journal of Building Engineering, v. 44. 102704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102704.
  61. Nunez-Cacho, P., Gorecki, J., Molina, V., Corpas-Iglesias, F. A. (2018). New measures of circular economy thinking in construction companies. Journal of EU Research in Business, v. 2018, 909360. https://ibimapublishing.com/wp-content/uploads/articles/JEURB/2018/909360/909360.pdf.
  62. Osmani, M., Glass, J., Price, A. D. (2006). Architect and contractor attitudes to waste minimisation. Waste and Resource Management, 159 (2), p. 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1680/warm.2006.159.2.65.
  63. Osmani, M., Glass, J., Price, A. D. (2008). Architects’ perspectives on construction waste reduction by design. Waste Management, 28 (7), p.1147-1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.011.
  64. Pan X., Wong, C.W.Y., Li, C. (2022). Circular economy practices in the waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) industry: A systematic review and future research agendas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365,132671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132671.
  65. Panteli, C., Kylili, A., Stasiuliene, L., Seduikyte, L., Fokaides, P. A. (2018). A framework for building overhang design using building information modeling and life cycle assessment. Journal of Building Engineering, 20, 248-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.07.022.
  66. Patalinghug, M. E., Sarcena, J. D. G., Seronio, R., Bustamante, R. S., Melecio, K. G., Mangubat, J. M., Patalinghug, H. F. (2023). Correlates of Crime Prevention and Perception of Safety Using the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior (KAB) Model. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 31(2), 637-654. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/45e9/be9dc233cbbe3d5b6ee5a285d90f978f84dc.pdf.
  67. Patwa, N., Sivarajah, U., Seetharaman, A., Sarkar, S., Maiti, K. and Hingorani, K. (2021). Towards a circular economy: an emerging economies context. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 122, p. 725-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.015.
  68. Pomponi, F., Moncaster, A. (2017). Circular economy for the built environment: a research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055.
  69. Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E., Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular Economy: Measuring Innovation in the Product Chain. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. https://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/downloads/pbl-2016-circular-economy-measuring-innovation-in-product-chains-2544.pdf.
  70. Rahla, K.M., Mateus, R. Bragança, L. (2021b). Implementing Circular Economy Strategies in Buildings- From Theory to Practice. Applied System Innovation, 4 (2), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4020026.
  71. Rahla, K.M., Mateus, R., Bragança, L. (2021a). Selection Criteria for Building Materials and Components in Line with the Circular Economy Principles in the Built Environment- A Review of Current Trends. Infrastructures, 6 (4), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6040049.
  72. Rahman, M.H., Yaqot, M., Menezes, B.C. (2023). Towards Circular Economy in Manufacturing Industries Based on Industry 4.0 Technologies. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 18-21 December, Singapur. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10406739.
  73. Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Ritala, P., Mäkinen, S. J. (2018). Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: A cross-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 135, 70- 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.017.
  74. Reike, D., Vermeulen, W.J., Witjes, S. (2018). The circular economy: New or refurbished as CE 3.0?- Exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 135, 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027.
  75. Rodrigues, S., Costa, B., J., Moreno, P., Moreno, P. (2020). Circular Economy: A Perspective of Builders, Architects, and Consumers in the Panama Construction Sector. In Book: Mapping, Managing, and Crafting Sustainable Business Strategies for the Circular Economy. Chapter 15, p. 316-337. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/circular-economy/257299.
  76. Salgin, B., Cosgun, N., Ipekci, C.A., Karadayi, T.T. (2020). Turkish Architects’ Views on Construction and Demolition Waste Reduction in the Design Stage. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 19(3), 439-452. https://www.eemj.eu/index.php/EEMJ/article/view/4067/0.
  77. Schrader, P. G., Lawless, K. A. (2004). The knowledge, attitudes, & behaviors approach how to evaluate performance and learning in complex environments. Performance Improvement, 43(9), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140430905.
  78. Smol, M., Kulczycka, J., Henclik, A., Gorazda, K., Wzorek, Z. (2015). The possible use of sewage sludge ash (SSA) in the construction industry as a way towards a circular economy, Journal of Cleaner Production, 95, 45-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.051.
  79. Sousa, S., Correia, E., Leite, J., Viseu, C. (2020). Environmental knowledge, attitudes and behavior of higher education students: a case study in Portugal. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 30(4), 348-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1838122.
  80. Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y., Yu, X. (2013). A review of the circular economy in China: moving from rhetoric to implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, 215-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020.
  81. Thelen, D., van Acoleyen, M., Huurman, W., Thomaes, T., van Brunschot, C., Edgerton, B., Kubbinga, B. (2018). Scaling the circular built environment: pathways for business and government. Circle Economy- WBCSD. https://www.wbcsd.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Scaling-the-Circular-Built-Environment-pathways-for-business-and-government.pdf.
  82. Tjahjono, M., Ünal, E., Tran, T.H. (2023). The Circular Economy Transformation of Airports: An Alternative Model for Retail Waste Management. Sustainability, 15 (4), 3860. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043860.
  83. Tserng, H-P., Chou, C-M., Chang, Y-T. (2021). The Key Strategies to Implement Circular Economy in Building Projects- A Case Study of Taiwan. Sustainability, 13 (2), 754. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020754.
  84. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2023). 2023 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction. https://unfccc.int/ttclear/misc_/StaticFiles/gnwoerk_static/tn_meetings/00cf22a4049c4ece9f414e190def4202/8dff87ea3e1e4e7ba7d349a83ed04cbd.pdf.
  85. Url-1< https://www.weforum.org/reports/shaping-the-future-of-construction-a-breakthrough-in-mindset-and-technology/
  86. Url-2<https://emf.thirdlight.com/link/bxqwo5kx53lq-2syjxg/@/preview/1?o
  87. Url-3< https://www.mimarist.org/esin-koymenin-mimarlar-odasi-istanbul-buyukkent-subesi-47-donem genel-kurul-konusmasi/#:~:text=Bug%C3%BCn%20Mimarlar%20Odas%C4%B1'n%C4%B1n%20aktif,toplamda%205%20bin%20510'dur
  88. Van Buren, N., Demmers, M., Van der Heijden, R., Witlox, F. (2016). Towards a Circular Economy: The Role of Dutch Logistics Industries and Governments. Sustainability, 8 (7), 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070647.
  89. Vermeulen, W.J.V., Reike, D., Witjes, S. (2018). Circular Economy 3.0: Getting Beyond the Messy Conceptualization of Circularity and the 3R’s, 4R’s and More. In book: CEC4Europe Factbook; Circular Economy Coalition for Europe, pp.1–6. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/381445.
  90. Wallius, V., Kunttu, J., Leskinen, P., Van Brusselen, J., Näyhä, A. (2023). Stakeholder perceptions of wood-based products in the built environment: a literature review. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 81, 287–299. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00107-022-01905-4.
  91. Wenbo, L. (2011). Comprehensive evaluation research on circular economic performance of eco-industrial parks. Energy Procedia, 5, 1682–1688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.287.
  92. Wijewansha, A.S., Tennakoon, G.A., Ekanayake, B.J., Waidyasekara, K.G.A.S., (2021). Implementation of circular economy principles during pre-construction stage: the case of Sri Lanka. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 750-766. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/BEPAM-04-2020-0072/full/html.
  93. Zimmann, R., O’Brien, H., Hargrave, J., Morrell, M. (2016). The circular economy in the built environment. ARUP. https://www.arup.com/insights/circular-economy-in-the-built-environment/.