Dergiler / Business and Economics Research Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Distributional Effects of Human Capital in Advanced Economies: Dynamics of Economic Globalization

Sayfa
591–607
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

All these estimation results show that they are contradicted with the mainstream findings, each of which puts forward that higher level of human capital reduces the level of income inequality.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study investigates the human capital-income inequality nexus for 19 advanced economies.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The whole sample covers the period between 1990 and 2017.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:All these estimation results show that they are contradicted with the mainstream findings, each of which puts forward that higher level of human capital reduces the level of income inequality.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This study investigates the human capital-income inequality nexus for 19 advanced economies. The whole sample covers the period between 1990 and 2017. The econometric analysis considers two fundamentalpanel data methods, namely the fixed-effects and two-step system GMM, to test whether the correlation between human capital development and income inequality is negative or not. The empirical findings of these two particular panel data methods reveal thatwhile the initial stages of accumulating a higher degree of human capital through increasing the average years of schooling and returns to education reduce the level of income inequality, the later stages show that this negative relationship turns into positive by way of widening the unequal distribution of national income. In addition, the economic globalization appears to be positively correlated with income inequality, meaning that globalized economic relations widen the scale of inequality where the statistical significance of human capital-income inequality nexus still prevails. All these estimation results show that they are contradicted with the mainstream findings, each of which puts forward that higher level of human capital reduces the level of income inequality.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZDEMİR, O. (2020). Distributional Effects of Human Capital in Advanced Economies: Dynamics of Economic Globalization. Business and Economics Research Journal, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 591–607. https://ajindex.com/articles/165818

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2010). Skills, tasks and technologies: implications for employment and earnings. NBER Working Paper No. 16082, National Bureau of Economic Research. Andersen, T. M. (2019). Social background, education, and inequality. Economic Inquiry, 57(3), 1441-1459.
  2. Andersen, T. G., & Sørensen, B. E. (1996). GMM estimation of a stochastic volatility model: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 14(3), 328-352.
  3. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. R. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
  4. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
  5. Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2011). Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(1), 3-71.
  6. Autor, D. (2014). Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the “other 99 percent”. Science, 344(6186), 843-851.
  7. Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950-2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184-198. Battistόn, D., García-Domench, C., & Gasparini, L. (2014). Could an increase in education raise income inequality? Evidence for Latin America. Latin American Journal of Economics, 51(1), 1-39.
  8. Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 9-49.
  9. Becker, G. S., & Tomes, N. (1979). An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1153-1189.
  10. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
  11. Bol, T. & van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2013). Educational systems and the trade-off between labor market allocation and equality of educational opportunity. Comparative Education Review, 57(2), 285-308.
  12. Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F. H. G., & Lustig, N. (2005). The microeconomics of income distribution dynamics in East Asia and Latin America. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Publications. Bowsher, C. G. (2002). On testing overidentifying restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Economics Letters, 77(2), 211-220.
  13. Campos-Vazquez, R., Esquivel, G., & Lustig, N. (2014). The rise and fall of income inequality in Mexico, 1989-2010. In Falling inequality in Latin Ame