Dergiler / KBB-Forum / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

THE EFFECTS OF LATERAL OSTEOTOMY ON THE AESTHETIC, PSYCHOLOGICAL, AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF RHINOPLASTY

Sayfa
81–88
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusions: For certain patients, rhinoplasty without lateral osteotomy may be a good choice, being associated with less postoperative edema and ecchymosis, better nasal breathing, and reduced psychosocial stress.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: We explored the effects of lateral osteotomy on ecchymosis and edema, as well as the psychosocial, functional andaesthetic outcomes of rhinoplasty.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients with a narrow nasal dorsum and short nasal bones underwent rhinoplasty without lateral osteotomy (n = 32) (Group 1); patients with a wide nasal dorsum underwent rhinoplasty with lateral osteotomy (n = 48) (Group 2).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusions: For certain patients, rhinoplasty without lateral osteotomy may be a good choice, being associated with less postoperative edema and ecchymosis, better nasal breathing, and reduced psychosocial stress.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Introduction: We explored the effects of lateral osteotomy on ecchymosis and edema, as well as the psychosocial, functional andaesthetic outcomes of rhinoplasty. Materials and Methods: Patients were divided into two groups by nasal width. Patients with a narrow nasal dorsum and short nasal bones underwent rhinoplasty without lateral osteotomy (n = 32) (Group 1); patients with a wide nasal dorsum underwent rhinoplasty with lateral osteotomy (n = 48) (Group 2). The pre- and post-operative dorsal and ventral nasal widths were measured. Pre- and post-operative functional and aesthetic status were evaluated using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE), and Derriford Appearance Scale 24 (DAS24) questionnaires. Postoperative edema and ecchymosis were compared between the groups. Results: Age and sex were similar between the groups (both p>0.05). The preoperative dorsal and ventral widths were greater in Group 2. The preoperative NOSE and ROE scores were similar between the two groups (both p>0.05) and the DAS24 score was lower in Group 1. Significant improvements in the NOSE, ROE, and DAS24 scores were observed postoperatively in both groups (all p<0.05). The NOSE and DAS24 scores improved more in Group 1 (both p<0.05), whereas the ROE score improvements were similar between the groups. The postoperative edema and ecchymosis scores were significantly lower in Group 1 (both p<0.05). Conclusions: For certain patients, rhinoplasty without lateral osteotomy may be a good choice, being associated with less postoperative edema and ecchymosis, better nasal breathing, and reduced psychosocial stress.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KÜTÜK, S. G. (2020). THE EFFECTS OF LATERAL OSTEOTOMY ON THE AESTHETIC, PSYCHOLOGICAL, AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF RHINOPLASTY. KBB-Forum, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 81–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/165451

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Guyuron B. Nasal osteotomy and airway changes. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:856-60; discussion 61-3. 2.Helal MZ, El-Tarabishi M, Magdy Sabry S, et al. Effects of rhinoplasty on the internal nasal valve: a comparison between internal continuous and external perforating osteotomy. Ann Plast Surg 2010;64:649-57. 3.Rohrich RJ, Janis JE, Adams WP, et al. An update on the lateral nasal osteotomy in rhinoplasty: an anatomic endoscopic comparison of the external versus the internal approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:2461-2; discussion 3. 4.Arslan E. No osteotomy rhinoplasty: indications and surgical details. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2014;38:57-62. 5.Kortbus MJ, Ham J, Fechner F, et al. Quantitative analysis of lateral osteotomies in rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006;8:369-73. 6.Karahatay S, Tasli H, Karakoc O, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Turk J Med Sci 2018;48:212-6. 7.Celik M, Altintas A. The Turkish Version of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation Questionnaire: Validation and Clinical Application. Balkan Med J 2019;36:129-33. 8.Carr T, Moss T, Harris D. The DAS24: a short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol 2005;10:285-98. 9.Higuera S, Lee EI, Cole P, et al. Nasal trauma and the deviated nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:64S-75S. 10.Tas S. The Use of Bone Dust to Correct the Open Roof Deformity in Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;142:629-38. 11.Nassif P, Kulbersh J. Rhinoplasty and bony vault complications. Facial Plast Surg 2012;28:303-9. 12.Ilhan AE, Cengiz B, Caypinar Eser B. Double-Blind Comparison of Ultrasonic and Conventional Osteotomy in Terms of Early Postoperative Edema and Ecchymosis. Aesthet Surg J 2016;36:390-401. 13.Avsar Y. The oscillating micro-saw: a safe and pliable instrument for transverse osteotomy in rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2012;32:700-8. 14.Apaydin F. Rebuilding the Middle Vault in Rhinoplasty: A New Classification of Spreader Flaps/Grafts. Facial Plast Surg 2016;32:638-45. 15.Kocak OF, Duzenli U. Assessment of Vertical Triangular Spreader Graft Technique for Reconstruction of Middle Vault and Internal Nasal Valve Angle. J Craniofac Surg 2018;29:2096-100. 16.Kosins AM, Daniel RK. Decision Making in Preservation Rhinoplasty: A 100 Case Series With One-Year Follow-Up.Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 08 Apr 2019, DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjz107 17.Floyd EM, Ho S, Patel P,