Dergiler / Eğitimde Politika Analizleri ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Finding Clarity in Teaching: One Teacher’s Struggle

Sam Roberson(Plano Independent School District)
Sayfa
5–16
Yayın Tarihi
2017-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In doing so, the author clarified his own struggle to make sense of the relationship between teaching and learning.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Teaching and learning are interdependent terms, and the work of the teacher is to ensure that students learn.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Teachers need to be clear on what they mean by learning.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In doing so, the author clarified his own struggle to make sense of the relationship between teaching and learning.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Teaching · Rubric for Learning Behavior · teacher struggle

Abstract

Teaching and learning are interdependent terms, and the work of the teacher is to ensure that students learn. Teachers need to be clear on what they mean by learning. Learning is often judged by what students accumulate in content or is based on a student’s mastery of content as revealed by grades. However, for the author, there is more to learning—specifically, the behaviors of the learner. The author proposes a Rubric for Learning Behavior to augment the concept of learning with a concept of the engagement of the learner. In doing so, the author clarified his own struggle to make sense of the relationship between teaching and learning.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Roberson, S. (2017). Finding Clarity in Teaching: One Teacher’s Struggle. Eğitimde Politika Analizleri ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 5–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/1649574

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D., (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Addison Wesley.
  2. Bloom, Benjamin S., (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: McKay.
  3. Bruce, B. C. & Eryaman, M. Y. (2015). Introduction: Progressive Impuls in Education. In M. Y. Eryaman & B. C. Bruce (Eds.). International Handbook of Progressive Education. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 1-52.
  4. Dewey, John. (1910/1997). How we think. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, Inc.
  5. Eryaman, M. Y. (2006). Traveling beyond dangerous private and universal discourses: Radioactivity of radical hermeneutics and objectivism in educational research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(6), 1198-1219.
  6. Eryaman, M. Y. (2007). From reflective practice to practical wisdom: Toward a post-foundational teacher education. International Journal of Progressive Education, 3(1), 87-107.
  7. Eryaman, M. Y. & Genc, S. Z. (2010). Learning theories. In C. Kridel (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Curriculum Studies. Sage Publications.
  8. Fink, L. Dee. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  9. Juarez, Tina. (1994). Mastery grading to serve student learning in the middle grades. Middle School Journal, 26 (1), 37-41.
  10. Myers, David. (2004). Psychology: Seventh edition in modules. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
  11. Perkins, David. (1998). What is understanding? In M. S. Wiske (Ed.), Teaching for understanding (pp. 39-57). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  12. Riedler, M. & Eryaman M.Y. (2016). Complexity, Diversity and Ambiguity in Teaching and Teacher Education: Practical Wisdom, Pedagogical Fitness and Tact of Teaching. International Journal of Progressive Education. 12(3): 172-186.
  13. Roberson, Sam. (2010). Rubric for learning behavior. Unpublished course material: EDAD 619 Designing Curriculum for Effective Instruction.