Dergiler / Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation on Stroke Recovery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Fonksiyonel Elektrik Stimülasyonunun İnme İyileşmesi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma

Sayfa
67–70
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Upper extremity FES can be preferred as an additional method in upper limb rehabilitation to improve spasticity, motor functions, handgrip strength and level of independence in performing activities of daily living in stroke patients.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To investigate the effect of upper extremity functional electrical stimulation (FES) on functional recovery in stroke patients.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Primary [Fugl-Meyer and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)] and secondary measures [range of motion, Motor Activity Log-28 (MAL-28), Jebsen-Taylor test, handgrip strength, Short Form-36] were assessed before treatment (t0), at the second week of therapy (t1) and after treatment (t2).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Upper extremity FES can be preferred as an additional method in upper limb rehabilitation to improve spasticity, motor functions, handgrip strength and level of independence in performing activities of daily living in stroke patients.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: To investigate the effect of upper extremity functional electrical stimulation (FES) on functional recovery in stroke patients. Material and Methods: The study was a randomizedcontrolled prospective trial, and approved by the local ethics committee. Stroke patients met criteria and accepted to be in study were randomly allocated to routine physiotherapy (control group) or routine physiotherapy + FES (FES group). Primary [Fugl-Meyer and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)] and secondary measures [range of motion, Motor Activity Log-28 (MAL-28), Jebsen-Taylor test, handgrip strength, Short Form-36] were assessed before treatment (t0), at the second week of therapy (t1) and after treatment (t2). Results: Seventeen patients were included in the study (control n: 8, FES n: 9). There were no significant differences between the groups for all outcomes at t0, t1 and t2 assessments. Significantly better results were detected in terms of elbow flexor muscles MAS score (p:0.014), upper extremity Fugl-Meyer score (p:0.011), grip strength (p:0.015) and MAL-28 score (p:0.012) within the FES group. The upper extremity Fugl-Meyer score of the control group was found to be significantly higher at repeated measures within the group (p:0.012). Conclusion: Upper extremity FES can be preferred as an additional method in upper limb rehabilitation to improve spasticity, motor functions, handgrip strength and level of independence in performing activities of daily living in stroke patients.

Abstract

Amaç: Üst ekstremite fonksiyonel elektrik stimülasyonunun (FES) inmeli hastalarda fonksiyonel iyileşme üzerine etkisini araştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Randomize-kontrollü prospektif çalışmamız için etik kurul onayı alındı. Kriterleri karşılayan ve çalışmaya katılmak için onam veren inmeli hastalar rutin fizyoterapi (kontrol grubu) ve rutin fizyoterapi+FES (FES grubu) olarak 2 gruba randomize edildi. Hastalartedavi öncesinde (t0), tedavinin ikinci haftasında (t1) ve tedavi bitiminde (t2) primer [Fugl-Meyer ve Modifiye Ashworth skalası (MAS)] ve sekonder ölçütler [eklem hareket açıklığı, Motor Aktivite İzlemi-28 (MAİ 28), Jebsen-Taylor testi, el kavram gücü, Kısa form-36] ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 17 hasta dahil edildi (8 kontrol, 9 FES grubu). Her iki grup arasında t0, t1 ve t2 ölçümlerinde tüm ölçütlerde istatistiksel anlamlı fark gözlenmedi. FES tedavisi alan grupta tekrarlayan ölçümlerde dirsek fleksör spastisitesi (p:0.014), üst ekstremite Fugl-Meyer skoru (p:0.011), kavrama gücü (p:0.015) ve MAİ-28 skorlarında (p:0.012) istatistiksel anlamlı iyileşme saptandı. Kontrol grubunda üst ekstremite Fugl-Meyer skorunda istatistiksel anlamlı düzelme tespit edildi (p:0.011). Sonuç: Üst ekstremite FES, inmeli hastalarda spastisite, motor fonksiyon, el kavrama gücü ve günlük yaşam aktivitelerinde iyileşme için standart fizyoterapiye ilave bir teknik olarak tercih edilebilir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEMİR, Y., ALACA, R., YAZICIOĞLU, K., YAŞAR, E., TAN, A. K. (2018). The Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation on Stroke Recovery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 67–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/164927

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Feys HM, De Weerdt WJ, Selz BE, et al. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Stroke. 1998;29:785-92.
  2. Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, et al. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;50:714-9.
  3. Nakayama H, Jørgensen H, Raaschou H, et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:394-8. Gowland C. Recovery of motor function following stroke: profile and predictions. Physiother Can. 1984;34:77-84.
  4. Koyuncu E, Nakipoğlu-Yüzer GF, Doğan A ve ark. The effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation for the treatment of shoulder subluxation and shoulder pain in hemiplegic patients: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:560-6.
  5. Church C, Price C, Pandyan AD, et al. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the shoulder after acute stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:2995-3001.
  6. Feys HM, De Weerdt WJ, Selz BE, et al. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. Stroke. 1998;29:785-92.
  7. Eraifej J, Clark W, France B, et al. Effectiveness of upper limb functional electrical stimulation after stroke for the improvement of activities of daily living and motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2017;6:40. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, et al. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:2181-6. Hara Y. Rehabilitation with functional electrical stimulation in stroke patients. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;1:147. Howlett OA, Lannin NA, Ada L, et al. Functional electrical stimulation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96: 934-43.
  8. Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12:CD010820. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13-31.
  9. Gregson JM, Leathley M, Moore AP, et al. Reliability of the Tone Assessment Scale and the modified Ashworth scale