Dergiler / Recent Trends in Pharmacology / 2026 / Volume: 4 Issue: 2

Protocol Adherence in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Treated with Nusinersen and Risdiplam: A Retrospective Registry-Based Pharmacoclinical Audit

Roberto Lozano(Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain)0000-0002-0369-0815
Carina Bona(Unit for the Rational Use of Medicines, Aragón Health Service, Zaragoza, Spain)0009-0003-5231-9005
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-08-28
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Registry-based monitoring provides valuable real-world evidence on SMA therapy implementation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Disease-modifying therapies such as nusinersen and risdiplam have significantly changed the management of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Demographic data, SMA phenotype, SMN2 copy number, treatment initiation, therapy sequence, and persistence were analyzed descriptively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Registry-based monitoring provides valuable real-world evidence on SMA therapy implementation.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Spinal muscular atrophy · nusinersen · risdiplam

Abstract

Objective: Disease-modifying therapies such as nusinersen and risdiplam have significantly changed the management of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). In Spain, both are reimbursed under a national pharmacoclinical protocol with registry-based monitoring. The objective was to evaluate protocol adherence and treatment patterns in routine clinical practice. Methods: A retrospective registry-based pharmacoclinical audit was conducted in a tertiary hospital within the Spanish National Health System. The primary purpose of the audit was to assess adherence to the national SMA pharmacoclinical protocol and the completeness of routinely collected registry data. Patients with genetically confirmed SMA receiving nusinersen or risdiplam were identified from pharmacoclinical registries linked to national monitoring systems (VALTERMED). Demographic data, SMA phenotype, SMN2 copy number, treatment initiation, therapy sequence, and persistence were analyzed descriptively. Descriptive analysis of continuous and categorical variables; no inferential testing was performed. Results: Sixteen patients were included (nusinersen n=6; risdiplam n=10). All nusinersen-treated patients fulfilled protocol criteria with complete documentation. Seven risdiplam-treated patients met eligibility criteria with full documentation, while three had incomplete registry variables without evidence of off-protocol use. Phenotype severity and SMN2 distribution were comparable. Treatment persistence was 100% in both groups. Risdiplam was more frequently used in older patients and after prior nusinersen. Conclusion: Both therapies were implemented according to national protocol criteria. Differences reflected treatment pathways and documentation completeness. Registry-based monitoring provides valuable real-world evidence on SMA therapy implementation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Lozano, R., Bona, C. (2026). Protocol Adherence in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Treated with Nusinersen and Risdiplam: A Retrospective Registry-Based Pharmacoclinical Audit. Recent Trends in Pharmacology, Volume: 4 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.62425/rtpharma.1958564

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Baranello, G., Darras, B. T., Day, J. W., Deconinck, N., Klein, A., Masson, R., Mercuri, E., & FIREFISH Working Group. (2021). Risdiplam in type 1 spinal muscular atrophy. The New England Journal of Medicine, 384(10), 915–923. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2009965
  2. Dayer, V. W., Drummond, M. F., Dabbous, O., Toumi, M., Neumann, P., Tunis, S., Teich, N., Saleh, S., Persson, U., von der Schulenburg, J. M. G., Malone, D. C., Salimullah, T., & Sullivan, S. D. (2024). Real-world evidence for coverage determination of treatments for rare diseases. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 19, 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03041-z
  3. Finkel, R. S., Mercuri, E., Darras, B. T., Connolly, A. M., Kuntz, N. L., & Kirschner, J. (2017). Nusinersen versus sham control in infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy. The New England Journal of Medicine, 377, 1723–1732. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1702752
  4. Hagenacker, T., Wurster, C. D., Günther, R., Schreiber-Katz, O., Osmanovic, A., & Petri, S. (2020). Nusinersen in adults with 5q spinal muscular atrophy: A non-interventional study. The Lancet Neurology, 19, 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30037-5
  5. Lefebvre, S., Bürglen, L., Reboullet, S., Clermont, O., Burlet, P., & Viollet, L. (1995). Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell, 80(1), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90460-3
  6. Mercuri, E., Darras, B. T., Chiriboga, C. A., Day, J. W., Campbell, C., & Connolly, A. M. (2018). Nusinersen versus sham control in later-onset spinal muscular atrophy. The New England Journal of Medicine, 378, 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1710504
  7. Mercuri, E., Deconinck, N., Mazzone, E. S., Nascimento, A., Oskoui, M., Saito, K., Vuillerot, C., Baranello, G., Boespflug-Tanguy, O., Goemans, N., Kirschner, J., Kostera-Pruszczyk, A., Servais, L., Gerber, M., Gorni, K., Khwaja, O., Kletzl, H., Scalco, R. S., Staunton, H., Yeung, W. Y., Martin, C., Fontoura, P., Day, J. W., & SUNFISH Study Group. (2022). Safety and efficacy of once-daily risdiplam in type 2 and non-ambulant type 3 spinal muscular atrophy (SUNFISH part 2): A phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet Neurology, 21(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00367-7
  8. Mercuri, E., Finkel, R. S., Muntoni, F., Wirth, B., Montes, J., & Main, M. (2018). Diagnosis and management of spinal muscular atrophy: Part 1: Recommendations for diagnosis, rehabilitation, orthopedic and nutritional care. Neuromuscular Disorders, 28(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2017.11.005
  9. Ministerio de Sanidad. (2024). Protocolo farmacoclínico para el tratamiento de la atrofia muscular espinal con nusinersen y risdiplam en el SNS. Ministerio de Sanidad.
  10. Oskoui, M., Day, J. W., Deconinck, N., Mazzone, E. S., Nascimento, A., Saito, K., Vuillerot, C., Baranello, G., Goemans, N., Kirschner, J., Kostera-Pruszczyk, A., Servais, L., Papp, G., Gorni, K., Kletzl, H., Martin, C., McIver, T., Scalco, R. S., Staunton, H., Yeung, W. Y., Fontoura, P., Mercuri, E., & The SUNFISH Working Group. (2023). Two-year efficacy and safety of risdiplam in patients with type 2 or non-ambulant type 3 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Journal of Neurology, 270(5), 2531–2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11560-1
  11. Pineda, E. D., To, T. M., Dickendesher, T. L., Shapouri, S., & Iannaccone, S. T. (2024). Adherence and persistence among risdiplam-treated individuals with spinal muscular atrophy: A retrospective claims analysis. Advances in Therapy, 41(6), 2446–2459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-02850-9
  12. Schoenmakers, D. H., van den Berg, S., Timmers, L., Adang, L. A., Bäumer, T., Bosch, A., van de Casteele, M., Datema, M. R., Dekker, H., Donnelly, C., Driessens, M. E. H. Graessner, H., Greger, V., Haddad, T., Höglinger, G. U., van den Hout, H., Jonker, C., Langeveld, M., Lambert, L. J., Neacy, E., Nieuwland, M., Klockgether, T., van der Knaap, M. S., Papadopoulou, A., Plueschke, K., van Rijn, S., Rosenberg, N., Saunier-Vivar, E. F., dos Santos Vieira, B., Hollak, C. E. M., Goettsch, W. G., & Wolf, N. I. (2024). Framework for multistakeholder patient registries in the field of rare diseases: Focus on neurogenetic diseases. Neurology, 103(6), e209743. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000209743
  13. Wirth, B. (2021). Spinal muscular atrophy: In the challenge lies a solution. Trends in Neurosciences, 44(4), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2020.11.009