Dergiler / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

THE MODERATING EFFECT OF LEADER ANGER ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE AND FOLLOWER JOB OUTCOMES

LİDER ÖFKESİNİN LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİ VE TAKİPÇİ İŞ SONUÇLARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ ÜZERİNE MODERE EDİCİ ETKİSİ

Sayfa
781–794
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results of the study reveal that leader anger moderates the relationship between leader-member exchange and the three follower job outcomes in such a way that they result in diminished levels of affective commitment towards the organization, trust in leader, and job satisfaction in cases of both high LMX and low LMX leaders.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study investigates the moderating effect of leader anger on the relationship between LMX, which is one of the most prominent leadership theories, and the three follower job outcomes of affective commitment towards the organization, trust in leader, and job satisfaction.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study was undertaken in the format of an experiment which is followed by a survey in which four groups of different fictional leader types were created, and respondents were asked to answer questions about these leaders assuming that they work with the described leader.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results of the study reveal that leader anger moderates the relationship between leader-member exchange and the three follower job outcomes in such a way that they result in diminished levels of affective commitment towards the organization, trust in leader, and job satisfaction in cases of both high LMX and low LMX leaders.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This study investigates the moderating effect of leader anger on the relationship between LMX, which is one of the most prominent leadership theories, and the three follower job outcomes of affective commitment towards the organization, trust in leader, and job satisfaction. This study was undertaken in the format of an experiment which is followed by a survey in which four groups of different fictional leader types were created, and respondents were asked to answer questions about these leaders assuming that they work with the described leader. The results of the study reveal that leader anger moderates the relationship between leader-member exchange and the three follower job outcomes in such a way that they result in diminished levels of affective commitment towards the organization, trust in leader, and job satisfaction in cases of both high LMX and low LMX leaders.

Abstract

Bu çalışma, lider öfke duygu dışavurumunun, lider-üye etkileşimi ve takipçi iş sonuçlarından örgütsel duygusal bağlılık, lidere güven ve iş memnuniyeti arasındaki ilişki üzerine modere edici etkisini araştırmaktadır. Bu çalışma, deney ve peşinden gelen anket formatında düzenlenmiştir. Deney formatında, dört farklı kurgusal lider tipi oluşturulmuştur ve daha sonraki gelen ankette, katılımcılardan, tarif edilen liderlerle çalıştıklarını varsayarak bu liderler hakkındaki soruları cevaplamaları istenmiştir. Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre, lider öfke duygu dışavurumu hem yüksek derecede hem de alçak derecede lider-üye etkileşimi sergileyen liderler için, daha düşük örgütsel duygusal bağlılık, daha düşük lidere güven ve daha düşük iş memnuniyetine yol açarak, lider-üye etkileşimi ve takipçi iş sonuçları arasındaki ilişkiyi modere eder.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ARAPOĞLU, N. B. B. (2019). THE MODERATING EFFECT OF LEADER ANGER ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE AND FOLLOWER JOB OUTCOMES. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 781–794. https://ajindex.com/articles/164613

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Akkaya, T. (2015). Lider-üye etkileşiminin iş doyumuna etkisinde örgütsel iklimin rolü: Hizmet sektöründe bir lojistik şirket uygulaması (Doctoral thesis, HaliçÜniversitesi,
  2. Istanbul, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  3. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
  4. Baker, N. (2018). Leader-member exchange and follower trust in leader: The moderating effect of leader emotional expressivity. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 4(4), 741-749.
  5. Brayfield, A., &Rothe, H. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307-311.
  6. Bulut, M. Ş. (2012). Lider-üye etkileşiminin yöneticiye güven ve iş tatmini üzerine etkisinin araştırılması: Öğretmenler üzerine bir araştırma (Master’s thesis, YeditepeÜniversitesi,
  7. Istanbul, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  8. Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46-78.
  9. Dasborough, M.T. (2006). Cognitive asymmetry in employee emotional reactions to leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 163-178.
  10. Eberly, M. B., & Fong, C. T. (2013). Leading via the heart and mind: The roles of leader and follower emotions, attributions and interdependence. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 696-711.
  11. Elfenbein, H. (2007). Emotion in organizations: A review and theoretical integration. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 315-386.
  12. Fitness J. (2000). Anger in the workplace: an emotion script approach to anger episodes between workers and their superiors, coworkers and subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 147-162.
  13. Gaddis, B., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Failure feedback as an affective event: Influence of leader affect on subordinate attitude and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 663-686.
  14. Gardner, W. L., Fischer, D., & Hunt, J. G. (2009). Emotional labor and leadership: A threat to authenticity? The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 466-482.
  15. George, J. M. (2000). Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Human Relations, 53, 1027-1055.
  16. Gibson, D. E., & Callister, R. R. (2010). Anger in organizations: Review and integration. Journal of Management, 36(1), 66-93.
  17. Glomb, T. M.,