KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Din ve İnsan Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 8

Çarmıhın Altında Kimlik: Nietzsche’nin Hristiyanlık Eleştirisi ve Teolojik Yanıtlar Işığında Kimlik ve Kişilik Sorunu

Identity Under the Cross: The Problem of Identity and Personality in the Light of Nietzsche's Critique of Christianity and Theological Responses

Ayhan Aksakallı(BAYBURT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6281-5828
Sayfa
260–284
Yayın Tarihi
2024-12-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu model, bireyselliği ve topluluk bağlarını dengelemeye odaklanır ve kimlik ile ahlak arasındaki dinamik ilişkiyi anlamaya katkı sağlar.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, Friedrich Nietzsche’nin Hristiyanlık eleştirisini kimlik ve ahlak üzerindeki etkileri bağlamında inceler.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Alternatif olarak sunduğu übermensch kavramı, bireyin kendi değerlerini yaratmasını savunur.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu model, bireyselliği ve topluluk bağlarını dengelemeye odaklanır ve kimlik ile ahlak arasındaki dinamik ilişkiyi anlamaya katkı sağlar.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Metafizik · kimlik · Nietzsche

Özet

Bu çalışma, Friedrich Nietzsche’nin Hristiyanlık eleştirisini kimlik ve ahlak üzerindeki etkileri bağlamında inceler. Nietzsche, Hristiyan etiğini bireyselliği baskılayan ve yaratıcılığı sınırlayan bir sistem olarak eleştirir. Ona göre, suçluluk duygusu bireysel özgürlüğü bastırmak için kullanılır. Alternatif olarak sunduğu übermensch kavramı, bireyin kendi değerlerini yaratmasını savunur. Ancak teolojik perspektifler, imago Dei doktriniyle bireyselliği ve insan onurunu vurgular. Bonhoeffer ise Hristiyanlığın suçluluk yerine özgürleştirici bir deneyim sunduğunu öne sürer. Çalışma, Nietzsche’nin bireysellik vurgusunu teolojik anlatılarla birleştirerek kimlik oluşumuna yönelik uzlaşmacı bir model sunar. Bu model, bireyselliği ve topluluk bağlarını dengelemeye odaklanır ve kimlik ile ahlak arasındaki dinamik ilişkiyi anlamaya katkı sağlar.

Abstract

This study examines Friedrich Nietzsche's critique of Christianity in the context of its effects on identity and morality. Nietzsche criticizes Christian ethics as a system that suppresses individuality and limits creativity. According to him, the sense of guilt is used to repress individual freedom. As an alternative, the concept of übermensch advocates for individuals to create their own values. However, theological perspectives emphasize individuality and human dignity through the doctrine of imago Dei. Bonhoeffer argues that Christianity offers a liberating experience instead of guilt. The study presents a reconciliatory model for identity formation by combining Nietzsche's emphasis on individuality with theological narratives. This model focuses on balancing individuality and community ties, contributing to the understanding of the dynamic relationship between identity and morality. These perspectives, the study offers insights into the dynamics of identity, morality, and individuality.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Aksakallı, A. (2024). Çarmıhın Altında Kimlik: Nietzsche’nin Hristiyanlık Eleştirisi ve Teolojik Yanıtlar Işığında Kimlik ve Kişilik Sorunu. Din ve İnsan Dergisi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 8, 260–284. https://doi.org/10.69515/dinveinsan.1554208

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (47)

  1. Ansell-Pearson, K. (1997). Viroid life: Perspectives on Nietzsche and the transhuman condition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203047033
  2. Aquinas, T. (1265–1274). Summa theologica. https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=
  3. Barth, K. (1956). Church dogmatics. T&T Clark. https://tftorrance.org/1956-tft-3
  4. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press. https://doaj.org/article/ 9a4d016498964490a8b12db7310be44c
  5. Browning, G. (2005). Global theory from Kant to Hardt. Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer. com/book/10.1057/9780230308541
  6. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge. http://www.kyoolee.net/GENDER_TROUBLE_-_Preface_-_Butler.pdf
  7. Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society. Wiley-Blackwell. https://books.google. com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=
  8. Clark, M., & Dudrick, D. (2012). The soul of Nietzsche’s Beyond good and evil. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=
  9. Deleuze, G. (1983). Nietzsche and philosophy. Columbia University Press. https://cup.columbia. edu/book/nietzsche-and-philosophy/9780231138772
  10. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton. https://www.academia. edu/37327712/Erik_H_Erikson_Identity_Youth_and_Crisis
  11. Frankl, V. (1985). Man’s search for meaning. Beacon Press. https://books.google.com.tr/books? hl=tr&lr=&id=
  12. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum. https://books.google.com.tr/books/ about/Pedagogy_of_the_Oppressed.html?id
  13. Freud, S. (1927). The future of an illusion. Hogarth Press. https://books.google.com.tr/books? hl=tr&lr=&id=
  14. Guignon, C. (2004). On being authentic. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203646793
  15. Gutierrez, G. (1971). A theology of liberation: History, politics, and salvation. Orbis Books. https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=
  16. Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity. Polity Press. https://philpapers. org/rec/HABTPD
  17. Hall, S. (1996). Questions of cultural identity. Sage Publications. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/ SAGE_5017585_752dd97c5ef.pdf
  18. Hollingdale, R. J. (1999). Nietzsche: The man and his philosophy. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=
  19. Kaufmann, W. (1974). Nietzsche: Philosopher, psychologist, antichrist. Princeton University Press. https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=
  20. Kierkegaard, S. (1849/1985). The sickness unto death (H. Hong & E. Hong, Trans.). Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691020280/
  21. Leiter, B. (2002). Nietzsche on morality. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Nietzsche-on- Morality/Leiter/p/book/9780415856805?srsltid
  22. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. University of Notre Dame Press. https://www.cambridge. org/core/journals/horizons/article/
  23. Marion, J.L. (2002). God without being. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago. edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/G/bo13358862.html
  24. Nietzsche, F. (1882). The gay science (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Random House. https://publishing. cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=
  25. Nietzsche, F. (1883). Thus spoke Zarathustra (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Penguin Books. https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/34775/thus-spoke-zarathustra-by-nietzsche
  26. Nietzsche, F. (1886). Beyond good and evil (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Random House. https://archive. org/details/friedrich-nietzsche-trans.-walter-kaufmann-beyond-good-and-evil-prelude-to-a-phi
  27. Nietzsche, F. (1887). On the genealogy of morals (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Vintage. https://archive. org/details/nietzscheonthegenealogy
  28. Nietzsche, F. (1888). Ecce homo (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Penguin Books. https://publishing. cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft5x0nb3sz&chunk.id
  29. Nietzsche, F. (1895). The antichrist (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Random House.
  30. Pannenberg, W. (1991). Systematic theology. Eerdmans. https://books.google.com.tr/books/ about/Systematic_Theology.html?id=ontO0BIwVJUC&redir_esc=y
  31. Reginster, B. (2006). The affirmation of life: Nietzsche on overcoming nihilism. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042643-intro
  32. Ricoeur, P. (1967). The symbolism of evil. Beacon Press. https://books.google.com.tr/books/ about/The_Symbolism_of_Evil.html?id=4LeEAxkcEAMC&redir_esc=y
  33. Ricoeur, P. (1995). Figuring the sacred: Religion, narrative, and imagination (D. Pellauer, Trans.). Fortress Press. https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=
  34. Rosen, S. (1995). The question of being: A reversal of Heidegger. Yale University Press. https://philpapers. org/rec/ROSTQO
  35. Sartre, J.-P. (1943). Being and nothingness. Washington Square Press. https://www.scirp.org/reference/ referencespapers?referenceid=1169860
  36. Sedgwick, P. (2009). Nietzsche: The key concepts. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203878514
  37. Solomon, R. C. (2003). Living with Nietzsche: What the great “immoralist” has to teach us. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=
  38. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773585669-016
  39. Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/ 9780674026766
  40. Tillich, P. (1952). The courage to be. Yale University Press. https://yalebooks. yale.edu/book/9780300188790/the-courage-to-be/
  41. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-02278-000
  42. Vattimo, G. (1997). Beyond interpretation: The meaning of hermeneutics for philosophy. Stanford University Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/VATBIT
  43. Ward, G. (2012). Ethics after postmodernity. Routledge. https://archive.org/details/understandpostmo0000ward? utm_source=
  44. White, M. (2007). Maps of narrative practice. W.W. Norton & Company. https://books.google. com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=
  45. Whitehead, A. N. (1929/1978). Process and reality. Free Press. https://archive.org/details/processrealitygi00alfr? utm_source
  46. Wright, N. T. (2006). Simply Christian: Why Christianity makes sense. HarperOne. https://www.thetbs.org/study-materials/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Simply_Christian_ Why_Christianity_Makes_Sense_
  47. Young, J. (1992). Nietzsche’s philosophy of religion. Cambridge University Press. https://1lib.sk/book/889767/bc6a44/nietzsches-philosophy-of-religion.html?utm_source