Dergiler / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Organizational Identification on Organizational Commitment

Sayfa
2151–2160
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The analysis can be expanded further to other industries and employees in the future studies.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose – The aim of this research is to identify the effect of organizational identification on organizational commitment.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The measurement tools were distributed to 275 participants consisting of white-collar employees working in trade, service and production companies operating in Istanbul.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The analysis can be expanded further to other industries and employees in the future studies.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Purpose – The aim of this research is to identify the effect of organizational identification on organizational commitment. Design/methodology/approach – Within the framework of the existing literature, two Likert type scales were used to measure the conceptual structures. The measurement tools were distributed to 275 participants consisting of white-collar employees working in trade, service and production companies operating in Istanbul. In total, 243 respondents filled out the questionnaires, however, 30 of them were evaluated as invalid due to the missing information. Finally, statistical analyses were performed based on the data of 213 respondents. The research was conducted by IBM SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 23.0 software. In addition to the main hypothesis, the relationships between organizational commitment and demographic variables such as age, status and work experience were investigated through statistical analysis. Findings – It has been concluded that there is a significant, linear, and positive relationship between two conceptual structures; and organizational identification has an effect on organizational commitment. On the other hand, no significant relationship was found between organizational commitment and the demographic variables of age, status, and work experience. Discussion – Organizational identification was found to be an effective factor in organizational commitment; and therefore, managers should work on improving the employee identification with the organizations. The findings are limited to the perceptions of 213 employees and the sample consists of employees working in enterprises operating in the trade, production, and service sectors in Istanbul. The analysis can be expanded further to other industries and employees in the future studies.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KÖSE, E., PEHLİVANOĞLU, M. Ç. (2020). The Effect of Organizational Identification on Organizational Commitment. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 2151–2160. https://ajindex.com/articles/164246

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Ahmad, R., & Islam, T. (2018). Relationships between corporate social responsibility, work engagement and organizational commitment: explanatory role of organizational identification. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 28(2), 112-130.
  2. Ahmad, S., Zulkurnain, N. N., & Khairushalimi, F. I. (2016). Assessing the validity and reliability of a measurement model in structural equation modeling (SEM). British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science, 15(3), 1-8.
  3. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  4. Aranki, D. H., Suifan, T. S., & Sweis, R. J. (2019). The relationship between organizational culture and organizational Commitment. Modern Applied Science, 13(4), 137-154.
  5. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
  6. Babadağ, M. (2015). Demografik faktörlerin örgütsel bağlılığa etkisi: Bir uygulama. Cankiri Karatekin University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 6(2), 313-332.
  7. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8-34.
  8. Baysal, İ. A., Baysal, G., Aksu, G., & Aksu, N. (2014). Presenteeism (işte varolmama sorunu) ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişki: Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi akademik personeli üzerinde bir uygulama. Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges, BÜROKON Özel Sayısı, Ağustos, 134-152.
  9. Beavers, A. S., Lounsbury, J. W., Richards, J. K., Huck, S. W., Skolits, G. J., & Esquivel, S. L. (2013). Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(6), 1-13.
  10. Blader, S. L., Patil, S., & Packer, D. J. (2017). Organizational identification and workplace behavior: More than meets the eye. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 19-34.
  11. Brown, R. B. (1996). Organizational commitment: Clarifying the concept and simplifying the existing construct typology. Journal Vocational Behavior, 49, 230-251.
  12. Brown, M. (1969). Identification and some conditions of organizational involvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 346-355.
  13. Etzioni, A.(1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Free Press.
  14. Fettahlıoğlu, Ö. O., & Tatlı, H. S. (2015). Örgütsel bağlılık ve farklılıkların yönetimi algılamaları arası ilişkilerin