Dergiler / Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty / 2024 / Volume: 11 Issue: 4

The Effect of Servant Leadership on Work Engagement: The Mediating Role of Person-Organization Fit

Gökhan Kenek(GÜMÜŞHANE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5019-4099
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2024-12-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Furthermore, it was revealed that person-organization fit partially mediates the effect of servant leadership on work engagement.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aimed to explore the relationship between servant leadership and work engagement and investigate the mediating role of person-organization fit in this relationship.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The research was conducted in July 2023 on blue-collar employees in the glass industry in the Marmara Region.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Furthermore, it was revealed that person-organization fit partially mediates the effect of servant leadership on work engagement.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2023 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Servant Leadership · Person-Organization Fit · Work engagement

Özet

This study aimed to explore the relationship between servant leadership and work engagement and investigate the mediating role of person-organization fit in this relationship. The research was conducted in July 2023 on blue-collar employees in the glass industry in the Marmara Region. A total of 266 employees participated in the survey. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted using the MPLUS7 package program, and hypotheses were tested using the SPSS26 program. The results of the analyses indicated that servant leadership positively influences person-organization fit and work engagement. Additionally, it was found that person-organization fit increases work engagement. Furthermore, it was revealed that person-organization fit partially mediates the effect of servant leadership on work engagement.

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the relationship between servant leadership and work engagement and investigate the mediating role of person-organization fit in this relationship. The research was conducted in July 2023 on blue-collar employees in the glass industry in the Marmara Region. A total of 266 employees participated in the survey. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted using the MPLUS7 package program, and hypotheses were tested using the SPSS26 program. The results of the analyses indicated that servant leadership positively influences person-organization fit and work engagement. Additionally, it was found that person-organization fit increases work engagement. Furthermore, it was revealed that person-organization fit partially mediates the effect of servant leadership on work engagement.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kenek, G. (2024). The Effect of Servant Leadership on Work Engagement: The Mediating Role of Person-Organization Fit. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, Volume: 11 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1489564

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (104)

  1. Abrams D (2010) Processes of prejudices: Theory, evidence and intervention. Equalities and Human Rights Commission, University of Kent.
  2. Akbaş, T. T. (2011). Algılanan kişi-örgüt uyumunun örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları üzerindeki etkisi: Görgül bir araştırma. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 53-82.
  3. Akgemci, T., Kalfaoğlu, S., & Erkunt, N. (2019). Hizmetkâr liderlik davranışlarının çalışan sesliliğine etkisini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 9(2), 757-771.
  4. Anderson, N., & Schalk, R. (1998). The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 637-647.
  5. Aslan, Ş., & Özata, M. (2011). Sağlık çalışanlarında hizmetkâr liderlik: Dennis-Winston ve Dennis-Bocernea hizmetkâr liderlik ölçeklerinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik araştırması. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 18(1), 139-154.
  6. Bakan, İ., & Doğan, İ. F. (2012). Hizmetkâr liderlik. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 1-12.
  7. Bakker, A. B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411414534
  8. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
  9. Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L., & Leiter, M. P. (2011). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 4-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.485352
  10. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 25-53.
  11. Bao, Y., Li, C., & Zhao, H. (2018). Servant leadership and engagement: A dual mediation model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(6), 406-417. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-12-2017-0435
  12. Barbuto, J. E., & Gifford, G. T. (2010). Examining gender differences of servant leadership: An analysis of the agentic and communal properties of the servant leadership questionnaire. Journal of Leadership Education, 9(2), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.12806/V9/I2/RF1
  13. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  14. Biswas, S., & Bhatnagar, J. (2013). Mediator analysis of employee engagement: Role of perceived organizational support, PO fit, organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Vikalpa, 38(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920130103
  15. Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Core self‐evaluations: A review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction and job performance. European Journal of Personality, 17(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.481
  16. Breevaart, K., Bakker, A., Hetland, J., Demerouti, E., Olsen, O. K., & Espevik, R. (2014). Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 138-157.
  17. Bretz, R.D. and Judge, T.A. (1994). Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44(1), 32-54. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1003
  18. Brown, S. P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996). A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 358. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021- 9010.81.4.358
  19. Cable, D. M., ve Judge, T. A. (1995, January 5). The role of person-organization fit in organizational selection decisions. CAHRS Working Paper Series. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/items/3ca5705f-17af-497c-a3b5- 59e25031814e/full
  20. Caplan, R. D. (1987). Person-environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 248-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-
  21. 8791(87)90042-X
  22. Chatman, J. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459–484. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1989.4980837
  23. Chen, P., Sparrow, P., & Cooper, C. (2016). The relationship between person-organization fit and job satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(5), 946-959. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-08-2014-0236
  24. Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K. (2016). Linking servant leadership to individual performance: Differentiating the mediating role of autonomy, competence and relatedness need satisfaction. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 124-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.08.004
  25. Choi S.B., Tran T.B.H., & Park B.I. (2015) Inclusive leadership and work engagement: mediating roles of affective organizational commitment and creativity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 43(6), 931–943. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.6.931
  26. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Routledge.
  27. Csobanka, Z. E. (2016). The Z generation. Acta Educationis Generalis, 6(2), 63-76.
  28. Dahleez, K. A., Aboramadan, M., & Bansal, A. (2021). Servant leadership and affective commitment: the role of psychological ownership and person–organization fit. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(2), 493-511. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2020-2105
  29. Dalal, R. S., Baysinger, M., Brummel, B. J., & LeBreton, J. M. (2012). The relative importance of employee engagement, other job attitudes, and trait affect as predictors of job performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, E295-E325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01017.x
  30. De Clercq, D., Bouckenooghe, D., Raja, U., & Matsyborska, G. (2014). Servant leadership and work engagement: The contingency effects of leader–follower social capital. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(2), 183-212. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21185
  31. Dolot, A. (2018). The characteristics of Generation Z. E-mentor, 74(2), 44-50.
  32. Duyan, E., & Van Dierendonck, D. (2014). Hizmetkar liderliği anlamak: Teoriden ampirik araştırmaya doğru.
  33. İstanbul Journal of Sociological Studies, (49), 1-32.
  34. Ellemers, N., & Haslam, S. A. (2012). Social identity theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 2, 379- 398.
  35. Engelbrecht, A. S., Heine, G., & Mahembe, B. (2017). Integrity, ethical leadership, trust and work engagement. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(3), 368-379.
  36. Farling, M. L., Stone, A. G., and Winston, B. E. (1999). Servant leadership: Setting the stage for empirical research. Journal of Leadership Studies 6(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199900600104
  37. Farooqui, M. S., & Nagendra, A. (2014). The impact of person organization fit on job satisfaction and performance of the employees. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 122-129.
  38. Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001
  39. Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
  40. Greguras, G. J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Psychology,
  41. 94(2), 465. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0014068
  42. Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  43. Haar, J., Brougham, D., Roche, M. A., & Barney, A. (2017). Servant leadership and work engagement: The mediating role of work-life balance. New Zealand Journal of Human Resources Management (NZJHRM), 17(2), 56–72.
  44. Hamid, S. N. A., & Yahya, K. K. (2011). Relationship between person-job fit and person-organization fit on employees’ work engagement: A study among engineers in semiconductor companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Finance and Management 1(3) 184-254.
  45. Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.08.003
  46. Huang, Y. (2022). Spiritual leadership and job engagement: The mediating role of emotion regulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 844991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.844991
  47. İnceoglu, I., & Warr, P. (2011). Personality and job engagement. Journal of Personnel Psychology. 10(4), 177-181.
  48. Jansen, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2006). Toward a multidimensional theory of person-environment fit. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(2), 193-212.
  49. Juhdi, N., Pa'wan, F., & Hansaram, R. M. K. (2013). HR practices and turnover intention: The mediating roles of organizational commitment and organizational engagement in a selected region in Malaysia. The
  50. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(15), 3002-3019.
  51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.763841
  52. Kahn, W. (2010). The essence of employee engagement: Lessons from the field. In S. Albrecht (Ed.), Handbook of employee engagement (pp. 20–30). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849806374.00008
  53. Kahn, W.A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
  54. Kaya, B., & Karatepe, O. M. (2020). Does servant leadership better explain work engagement, career satisfaction and adaptive performance than authentic leadership? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(6), 2075-2095.
  55. Kenek, G., & Sökmen, A. (2022). Dönüştürücü liderlik ve işle bütünleşme ilişkisinde iş tatmininin aracılık rolü: Yapısal eşitlik modeli ile incelenmesi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(1), 1023-1040.
  56. Kiker, D.S., Callahan, J.S. & Kiker, M.B. (2019). Exploring the boundaries of servant leadership: A meta-analysis of the main and moderating effects of servant leadership on behavioral and affective outcomes, Journal of
  57. Managerial Issues, 31(2), 172-197.
  58. Kim, W., Kolb, J. A., & Kim, T. (2013). The relationship between work engagement and performance: A review of empirical literature and a proposed research agenda. Human resource development review, 12(3), 248-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484312461635
  59. Kılıç, K. C., & Aydın, Y. (2016). Hizmetkâr liderlik ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlaması: Güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 18(30), 106-113.
  60. Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person‐organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
  61. Leiter, M. P., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Work engagement: Introduction. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 1−9). Psychology Press.
  62. Li, J. (2006). The interactions between person–organization fit and leadership styles in Asian firms, an empirical testing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(10), 1689-1706.
  63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190600964343
  64. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C., & Meuser, J. D. (2014). Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1434-1452. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0034
  65. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Meuser, J. D., Hu, J., Wu, J., & Liao, C. (2015). Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 254-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.12.002
  66. Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., Zhao, H. and Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a
  67. multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.006
  68. Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2002.664018
  69. Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x
  70. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397-422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
  71. Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., Baharom, M. N. R., & Harun, H. (2014). Person-organization fit and turnover intention: The mediating role of employee engagement. Global Business and Management Research, 6(3), 205.
  72. Mete, E. S., Sökmen, A., & Bıyık, Y. (2016). The Relationship between organizational commitment organizational ıdentification person organization fit and job satisfaction: A research on IT employees. International Review of Management and Business Research, 53, 870–901.
  73. Morley, M. J. (2007). Person‐organization fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(2), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710726375
  74. Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., McKee, D. O., & McMurrian, R. (1997). An investigation into the antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviors in a personal selling context. Journal of Marketing, 61(3), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299706100306
  75. Öge, E., Çetin, M., & Top, S. (2018). The effects of paternalistic leadership on workplace loneliness, work family conflict and work engagement among air traffic controllers in Turkey. Journal of Air Transport Management, 66, 25-35.
  76. Pelealu, D. R. (2022). The effect of perceived organizational support, psychological well-being, and person job fit on organizational commitment through organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) as variable ıntervening in automotif companies. Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 9(4), 81-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.36347/sjebm.2022.v09i04.003
  77. Piasentin, K. A., & Chapman, D. S. (2006). Subjective person–organization fit: Bridging the gap between conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(2), 202-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.05.001
  78. Rich, B.L., Lepine, J.A. and Crawford, E.R. (2010), “Job engagement: antecedents and effects of job performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
  79. Richardson, H. A., Kluemper, D. H., & Taylor, S. G. (2021). Too little and too much authority sharing: Differential relationships with psychological empowerment and in‐role and extra‐role performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(8), 1099-1119. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2548
  80. Roberts, D. R., & Davenport, T. O. (2002). Job engagement: Why it's important and how to improve it. Employment Relations Today, 29(3), 21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ert.10048
  81. Roberts, G.E. (2018). Servant leadership across cultures. In Dhiman, S., Roberts, G. E. & Crossman, J. E. (Eds), The palgrave handbook of workplace spirituality and fulfillment (pp. 271-299), Palgrave Macmillan, Springer International Publishing.
  82. Romadhoni, A., Kusmaningtyas, A., & Susanti, N. (2023). Servant leadership to improve innovative work behavior through person organization fit and knowledge sharing behavior as mediation variables at employees of PT Telkom Akses Surabaya Utara, Indonesia. New Applied Studies in Management, Economics & Accounting, 6(2), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.22034/nasmea.2023.176614
  83. Sahlin, K., Tonkonogi, M., & Söderlund, K. (1998). Energy supply and muscle fatigue in humans. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 162(3), 261-266. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-201X.1998.0298f.x
  84. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
  85. Saks, A. M., Gruman, J. A., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Organization engagement: a review and comparison to job engagement. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 9(1), 20-49. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-12-2020-0253
  86. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and
  87. engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
  88. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
  89. Schneider, B., Goldstiein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 747-773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01780.x
  90. Seubert, C., Hopfgartner, L., & Glaser, J. (2021). Living wages, decent work, and need satisfaction: an integrated perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(6), 808-823.
  91. Silverthorne, C. (2004). The impact of organizational culture and person‐organization fit on organizational commitment and job satisfaction in Taiwan. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(7), 592- 599. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410561477
  92. Singhal, M., & Chatterjee, L. (2006). A person–organization fit-based approach for spirituality at work: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Human Values, 12(2), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/097168580601200205
  93. Spears, L. C. (1998). Tracing the growing impact of servant-leadership. In L. Spears (Ed.), Insights on leadership: Service, spirit, and servant- leadership (pp. 1-14). John Wiley and Sons.
  94. Tan, L., & Photchanachan, S. (2021). Research on the ımpact of humble leadership on employee engagement in the construction ındustry of Liaoning province, China. Nimitmai Review Journal, 4(2), 69-87.
  95. Turunç, Ö., & Çelik, M. (2012). İş tatmini-kişi örgüt uyumu ve amire güven-kişi-örgüt uyumu ilişkisinde dağıtım adaletinin düzenleyici rolü. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 14(2), 57-78.
  96. Ünal, Z. M., & Turgut, T. (2015). The buzzword: Employee engagement. does person-organization fit have a contribution on employee engagement? Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 8(2), 157-179.
  97. Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C. H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195-1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058
  98. Van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228- 1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380462
  99. Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(4), 439-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.249
  100. Vondey, M. (2010). The relationships among servant leadership, organizational citizenship behavior, person-organization fit, and organizational identification. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(1), 3-27.
  101. Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 517. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0018867
  102. Wan, Q., Zhou, W., Li, Z., & Shang, S. (2018). Associations of organizational justice and job characteristics with work engagement among nurses in hospitals in China. Research in Nursing & Health, 41(6), 555-562. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21908
  103. Yıluzar, H. (2016). Kişi-örgüt uyumu ile işe adanmışlık ve örgütsel bağlılık ilişkisi: Sağlık sektöründe bir araştırma [Unpublished master's thesis], Akdeniz University.
  104. Zhou, G., Gul, R., & Tufail, M. (2022). Does servant leadership stimulate work engagement? The moderating role of trust in the leader. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 925732. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925732