Comparison of two independentportfolios is shown by these risk ordering approaches
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Ordering of claim size risks can be done by stochastic dominance, stop-loss dominance andseveral other modalities of stochastic orders for decision making under uncertainty.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Emergence of risks can bedeteected in terms of some interdependent variables and factors such as risk reserves and premium amounts.Risk ordering must be done by models that take account of this interdependence.This paper discusses some major stochastic order modalities for comparisons of risks and introduces anew risk ordering criterion in terms or record values of claim size sequences.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Comparison of two independentportfolios is shown by these risk ordering approaches
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Record values · distribution of total claim amount · risk orderings
Abstract
Ordering of claim size risks can be done by stochastic dominance, stop-loss dominance andseveral other modalities of stochastic orders for decision making under uncertainty. Emergence of risks can bedeteected in terms of some interdependent variables and factors such as risk reserves and premium amounts.Risk ordering must be done by models that take account of this interdependence.This paper discusses some major stochastic order modalities for comparisons of risks and introduces anew risk ordering criterion in terms or record values of claim size sequences. Comparison of two independentportfolios is shown by these risk ordering approaches
Gebizlioglu, O. L., Tank., F. (2002). ORDERING OF CLAIM SIZE RISKS AND ACTUARIAL IMPLICATIONS. Istatistik Journal of The Turkish Statistical Association, Volume: 5 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1636522
Ahsanullah, M. (1985), Record Statistics. Nova Scince Publisher
Bairamov, I.G., (1997) Some distribution free properties of statistics based on record values and charecterization of the distributions through a record, Journal of Applies Statistical Science, Vol.5 No.1 pp.17-25.
Daykin, C.D., Pentikainen, T., Pesonen, E., (1995), Practical Risk Theory for Actuaries. Chapman and Hall
Goldie C., Rogers L.C.G., (1984), The k-record process are iid. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie Verw Gebiete Vol. 67, 197-211.
Goovaerts, M.J., Kaas, R., Heerwaarden, A.E., Bauwelinckx, T., (1990), Effective Actuarial Methods, North Holland.
Gupta R.C., (1984), Relations between order statistics and record values and some charecterization results. Journal of Applied Probability, 21, 425-430.
Heilmann W.R., (1986), Fundamentals of Risk Theory, VVW Karlsruhe
Mosler K., Scarsini M. (1991), Stochastic Orders and Decision Under Risk, IMS Lecture Notes-Mongraph Series, Vol.19
Nagaraja H.N. (1978), On the expected values of record values, Australian Journal of Statistics, 20(2), 182.
Nagaraja H.N. (1988), Record values and related statistics-A revies. Communications in Statistics
Theory and Methods, 17(7),2223-2238.
Resnick S.L., (1987), Extreme Values, Regular Variation and Point Process, Springer-Verlag.
Shaked M., Shantikumar J.G, (1994), Stochastic Orders and Their Applications, Academic Press.