KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Istatistik Journal of The Turkish Statistical Association / 2016 / Volume: 9 Issue: 3

SOME IMPROVED CLASSIFICATION-BASED RIDGE PARAMETER OF HOERL AND KENNARD ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES

Adewale F. Lukman(Department of StatisticsLadoke Akintola University of Technology)
Kayode Ayinde.(Department of Statistics Ladoke Akintola University of Technology)
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2016-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Results show that the improvedridge parameters proposed in this study are better than the existing ones most especially with the quantity

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In a linear regression model, it is often assumed that the explanatory variables are independent.This assumption is often violated and Ridge Regression estimator introduced by Hoerl and Kennard (1970)has been identified to be more efficient than ordinary least square (OLS) in handling it.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Investigation were done by conducting 1000 Monte-Carlo experiments under five (5) levels ofmulticollinearity, three (3) levels of error variance and five levels of sample size.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Results show that the improvedridge parameters proposed in this study are better than the existing ones most especially with the quantity
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In a linear regression model, it is often assumed that the explanatory variables are independent.This assumption is often violated and Ridge Regression estimator introduced by Hoerl and Kennard (1970)has been identified to be more efficient than ordinary least square (OLS) in handling it. However, it requiresa ridge parameter, K, of which many have been proposed. In this study, estimators based on Hoerl andKennard were classified into different forms and various types and some modifications were proposed toimprove it. Investigation were done by conducting 1000 Monte-Carlo experiments under five (5) levels ofmulticollinearity, three (3) levels of error variance and five levels of sample size. For the purpose of comparingthe performance of the improved ridge parameter with the existing ones, the number of times the MSE ofthe improved ridge parameter is less than the existing ones is counted over the levels of multicollinearity (5)and error variance (3). Also, a maximum of fifteen (15) counts is expected. Results show that the improvedridge parameters proposed in this study are better than the existing ones most especially with the quantity

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Lukman, A. F., Ayinde., K. (2016). SOME IMPROVED CLASSIFICATION-BASED RIDGE PARAMETER OF HOERL AND KENNARD ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES. Istatistik Journal of The Turkish Statistical Association, Volume: 9 Issue: 3. https://ajindex.com/articles/1636488

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (20)

  1. Alkhamisi, M., Khalaf, G. and Shukur, G. (2006). Some modifications for choosing ridge parameters,
  2. Communications in Statistics- Theory and Methods, 35(11), 2005-2020.
  3. Alkhamisi, M. and Shukur, G. (2007). A Monte Carlo study of recent ridge parameters, Commun. Statist.
  4. Simulation and Computation, 36(3), 535-547. Dorugade, A. V. (2014). On comparison of some ridge parameters in Ridge Regression, Sri Lankan
  5. Journal of Applied Statistics, 15(1), 31-46. Dorugade, A. V. and Kashid, D. N. (2010). Alternative method for choosing ridge parameter for regres- sion, International Journal of Applied Mathematical Sciences, 4(9), 447-456.
  6. Gibbons, D. G. (1981). A simulation study of some ridge estimators,Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 131-139.
  7. Gujarati, D.N.(1995). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  8. Hocking, R., Speed, F. M. and Lynn, M. J. (1976). A class of biased estimators in linear regression, Technometrics, 18(4), 425-437.
  9. Hoerl, A.E. and Kennard, R.W. (1970). Ridge regression: biased estimation for non-orthogonal problems, Technometrics, 12, 55-67.
  10. Khalaf, G. and Shukur, G. (2005). Choosing ridge parameters for regression problems, Communications in Statistics- Theory and Methods, 34, 1177-1182.
  11. Kibria, B. M. G. (2003). Performance of some new ridge regression estimators, Communications in
  12. Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 32, 419-435. Lawless, J. F. and Wang, P. (1976). A simulation study of ridge and other regression estimators, Com- munications in Statistics A, 5, 307-323.
  13. Lukman, A. F. and Ayinde, K. (2015). Review and classification of the Ridge Parameter Estimation
  14. Techniques, Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Accepted for Publication. Mansson, K., Shukur, G. and Kibria, B. M. G. (2010). A simulation study of some ridge regression estimators under different distributional assumptions,Communications in Statistics-Simulations and Com- putations, 39(8), 1639-1670.
  15. McDonald, G. C. and Galarneau, D. I. (1975). A Monte Carlo evaluation of some ridge-type estimators,
  16. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 407-416. Muniz, G. and Kibria, B. M. G. (2009). On some ridge regression estimators: An empirical compari- son,Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 38, 621-630.
  17. Muniz, G., Kibria, B.M.G., Mansson, K., Shukur, G. (2012). On Developing Ridge Regression Param- eters: A Graphical Investigation, SORT. 36(2), 115-138.
  18. Nordberg, L. (1982). A procedure for determination of a good ridge parameter in linear regression,
  19. Communications in Statistics A11, 285-309. Saleh, A. K. Md. E. and Kibria, B. M. G. (1993). Performances of some new preliminary test ridge regression estimators and their properties, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 22, 2747
  20. Wichern, D. and Churchill, G. (1978). A Comparison of Ridge Estimators, Technometrics, 20, 301–311.