KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 31 Issue: 1

Evaluation of Pesticide Use in Greenhouse Tomato Production in the Context of Sustainability, Food Safety and Export Residue Notifications

Merve Mürüvvet Dağ(ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, TARIM EKONOMİSİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0003-0809-4761
Hasan Yılmaz(ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, TARIM EKONOMİSİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-0487-8449
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2025-01-14
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition, greenhouse production support policies should be redesigned to encourage farmers to use biological control methods.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The sustainability of agricultural production and access to healthy food are important issues in the agricultural sector.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this research, original data obtained from a face-to-face survey conducted with 115 greenhouse tomato farmers in Kumluca district of Antalya province was used.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition, greenhouse production support policies should be redesigned to encourage farmers to use biological control methods.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Tomato · Pesticide · Türkiye

Abstract

The sustainability of agricultural production and access to healthy food are important issues in the agricultural sector. From a food safety perspective, pesticide residue problems are becoming an increasing concern for consumers worldwide. This study aims to evaluate pesticide use in greenhouse tomato production in terms of sustainability, food safety and export residue notifications. In this research, original data obtained from a face-to-face survey conducted with 115 greenhouse tomato farmers in Kumluca district of Antalya province was used. It was found that farmers on the surveyed farms used pesticides containing 57 different active ingredients. Various types of pesticides were used, including 12.9 kg/ha of insecticides, 10.9 kg/ha of nematicides, 8.8 kg/ha of fungicides, and 3.8 kg/ha of acaricides, resulting in a total of 36.5 kg/ha of pesticide use. The study revealed that 55.88% of the pesticides used by farmers were classified as hazardous according to the World Health Organization's (WHO) classification. The increasing number of pesticide residue notifications from European Union countries in recent years serves as a warning for Turkish farmers. Therefore, Türkiye needs to make more efforts to comply with international standards for the sustainability of tomato production and exports. As a result, in the research area, more efforts should be made to increase farmer training activities, tighten controls in greenhouse production, and strengthen safe food control mechanisms in order to reduce the use of pesticides for sustainable agriculture and safe food. In addition, greenhouse production support policies should be redesigned to encourage farmers to use biological control methods.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Dağ, M. M., Yılmaz, H. (2025). Evaluation of Pesticide Use in Greenhouse Tomato Production in the Context of Sustainability, Food Safety and Export Residue Notifications. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Volume: 31 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1469332

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (55)

  1. Abou-Arab A A K (1999). Behavior of pesticides in tomatoes during commercial and home preparation. Food chemistry 65(4):509-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00231-3
  2. Alguacil J, Kauppinen T, Porta M, Partanen T, Malats N, Kogevinas M, Benavides F G, Obiols J, Bernal F, Rifa J & Carrato A (2000). Risk of pancreatic cancer and occupational exposures in Spain. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 44(5): 391-403. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/44.5.391
  3. Anonymous (2023). Plant Protection Products Department of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Retrieved June 9, 2023, https://bku.tarimorman.gov.tr/
  4. Anonymous (2024). Supports Provided for Greenhouse Production. Retrieved June 18, 2024, https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Konular/Bitkisel-Uretim/Tarla-Ve-Bahce-Bitkileri/Ortu-Alti-Yetistiricilik
  5. Bassil K L, Vakil C, Sanborn M, Cole D C, Kaur J S, & Kerr K J (2007). Cancer health effects of pesticides: Systematic review. Canadian Family Physician 53(10): 1704-1711
  6. Bayramoğlu Z, Gündoğmuş E, & Tatlıdil F F (2010). The impact of EurepGAP requirements on farm income from greenhouse tomatoes in Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5(5): 348-355
  7. Çanakcı M & Akıncı İ (2009). Agricultural practices and human labor utilization in greenhouse vegetable cultivation in Antalya province. Journal of Agricultural Machinery Science 5(2): 193-202 (In Turkish)
  8. Ceylan R F, Özkan B, Sayın C & Akpınar M G (2020). Factors effecting profit efficiency of greenhouse producers in Antalya. International Conference Emerging New Word (ICENWE). July 26-28, India, 117-128
  9. Demircan V, Turan A & Dalgıç A (2019). Labor use in greenhouse tomato production: a case study from Kumluca district of Antalya province, Turkey. Lucrări Ştiinţifice 62(2): 9-12
  10. Dolapsakis G, Vlachonikolis I G, Varveris C & Tsatsakis A M (2001). Mammographic findings and occupational exposure to pesticides currently in use on crete. European Journal of Cancer, 37(12): 1531-1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00159-9
  11. Engindeniz S, Yılmaz İ, Durmuşoğlu E, Yağmur B, Eltez R Z, Demirtaş B, Engindeniz D & Tatarhan A H (2010). Comparative input analysis of greenhouse vegetables. Ecology, 19(74): 122-130. https://doi.org/10.5053/ekoloji.2010.7415
  12. European Commission (2024). The Common Agricultural Policy at A Glance. Retrieved June 18, 2024, https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/cap-overview/cap-glance_en
  13. Eyhorn F, Roner T & Specking H (2015). Reducing Pesticide Use and Risks-What Action is Needed. Swiss Intercooperation. September 1-30, Helvetas 1-32
  14. FAO (2023). Tomatoes. Retrieved June 20, 2023, https://www.fao.org/land-water/databases-and-software/crop-information/tomato/en/
  15. FAOSTAT (2020). Pesticides Indicators. Retrieved May 14, 2023, https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/EP
  16. Geiger F, Bengtsson J, Berendse F, Weisser W W, Emmerson M, Morales M B, Ceryngier P, Liira J, Tscharntke T, Winqvist C, Eggers S, Bommarco R, Part T, Retagnolle V, Plantegenest M, Clement L W, Dennis C, Palmer C, Onate J J, Guerrero I, Hawro V, Aavik T, Thies C, Flohre A, Hanke S, Fischer C, Goedhart P W, & Inchausti P. (2010). Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11(2): 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2009.12.001
  17. Hepsağ F & Kizildeniz T (2021). Pesticide residues and health risk appraisal of tomato cultivated in greenhouse from the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28(18): 22551-22562
  18. Infante-Rivard C, Labuda D, Krajinovic M & Sinnett D (1999). Risk of childhood leukemia associated with exposure to pesticides and with gene polymorphisms. Epidemiology 10(5): 481-487. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3703333
  19. Kan M (2002). Issues and Solution Suggestions in the Use of Agricultural Pesticides in Greenhouse Vegetable Cultivation in Kumluca District of Antalya Province. (Published Master's Thesis, Ankara University, Institute of Natural Sciences) (In Turkish)
  20. Karaman S & Yılmaz İ (2007). Analysis of factors determining the use of Bombus bees for pollination in greenhouse tomato production. Tekirdağ Journal of Agricultural Faculty 4(1): 99-107 (In Turkish)
  21. Kinuthia C W (2019). Determinants of pesticide use and uptake of alternative pest control methods among small scale tomato farmers in Nakuru County, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, Egerton University).
  22. Kumar N, Pathera A K, Saini P & Kumar M (2012). Harmful effects of pesticides on human health. Annals of Agri-Bio Research 17(2): 125-127
  23. Kurek A (2007). Eurepgap–The principles of certification and their implementation in horticultural holdings. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Oeconomia, 6(3):85-94.
  24. Maham S G, Rahimi A, Subramanian S & Smith D L (2020). The environmental impacts of organic greenhouse tomato production based on the nitrogen-fixing plant (Azolla). Journal of Cleaner Production, 245: 118679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118679
  25. Mahmood I, Imadi S R, Shazadi K, Gul A & Hakeem K R (2016). Effects of pesticides on environment. Plant, soil and microbes, 1: 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27455-3_13
  26. Malgie W, Ori L & Ori H (2015). A study of pesticide usage and pesticide safety awareness among farmers in Commewijne in Suriname. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 11(3): 621-636.
  27. Mason P G & Huber J T (2002). Biological Control Programmes in Canada, 1981–2000. CABI Publishing.
  28. Metin F D (2020). Determination of Purchasing Power of Producers Engaged in Greenhouse Tomato Production in Antalya Province. (Published Master's Thesis, Akdeniz University, Institute of Natural Sciences) (In Turkish)
  29. Nguetti J H, Imungi J K, Okoth M W, Wang’ombe J, Mbacham W F & Mitema S E (2018). Assessment of the knowledge and use of pesticides by the tomato farmers in Mwea Region, Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(8): 379-388.
  30. OECD (2022). Education at a Glance. Retrieved May 22, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1787/3197152b-en
  31. Ombeni J, Munyuli T & Makelele J (2021). Use of pesticides in tomato crop and its impact on the nutritional quality of vegetables and the health status of market gardeners in rural health zones of South Kivu Province, Eastern of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Academia Letters, 2.
  32. Özkan B, Akçaöz H V, Karaman S & Tașcıoglu Y (2002). An economic assessment of pesticide use in greenhouse vegetable production in Antalya Province.
  33. Özkan B, Hatırlı S A, Öztürk E & Aktaş A R (2008). Profitability Analysis of Greenhouse Tomato Production in Antalya Province. The Scientific And Technical Research Council Of Turkey. PROJECT NO: TOVAG-106 O 026. (In Turkish)
  34. Özkan B, Hatırlı S, Öztürk E & Aktaş A (2011). Profitability analysis of greenhouse tomato production in Antalya province. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 17(1): 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001154
  35. Pérez-García A, Romero D & De Vicente A (2011). Plant protection and growth stimulation by microorganisms: biotechnological applications of bacilli in agriculture. Current opinion in biotechnology, 22(2): 187-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2010.12.003
  36. Pishgar-Komleh S H, Akram A, Keyhani A, Raei M, Elshout P M F, Huijbregts M A J & Van Zelm R (2017). Variability in the carbon footprint of open-field tomato production in Iran-A case study of Alborz and East-Azerbaijan provinces. Journal of cleaner production, 142: 1510-1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.154
  37. RASFF Window (2023). European Commisssion. Retrieved January 2, 2024, https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/rasff-window/screen/list
  38. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Trade (2021). The Green Deal Action Plan. Retrieved June 5, 2023, https://ticaret.gov.tr/data/60f1200013b876eb28421b23/MUTABAKAT%20YE%C5%9E%C4%B0L.pdf
  39. Sanga E E & Elia E F (2020). Socio-demographic determinants of access to climate change information among tomato growing farmers in Mvomero District, Tanzania. University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal 15(2): 121-136
  40. Sayın B, Bayav A, Beşen T, Karamürsel D, Çelikyurt M A, Emre M, Kuzgun M, Yılmaz Ş G & Arslan S (2020). Determination of producers' perspectives on biological and biotechnical pest control practices and their environmental awareness. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Journal of Agriculture and Nature 23(2): 453-466. https://doi.org.tr/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.599085 (In Turkish)
  41. Sezgin V (2022). How will Ukraine-Russia war affect Turkish trade? Journal of Abant Social Sciences 22(2): 546-557
  42. Sharma A, Kumar V, Shahzad B, Tanveer M, Sidhu G P S, Handa N, Kohli S K, Yadav P, Bali A S, Parihar R D, Dar O I, Singh K, Jasrotia S, Bakshi P, Ramakrishnan M, Kumar S, Bhardwaj R & Thukral A K (2019). Worldwide pesticide usage and its impacts on ecosystem. SN Applied Sciences 1: 1-16
  43. Szpilko D & Ejdys J (2022). European Green Deal–research directions. a systematic literature review. Ekonomia i Środowisko. 2.
  44. Topuz E (2005). Some alternative methods to chemical pesticides in agricultural pest control. Derim 22(2): 53-59 (In Turkish)
  45. TRADE MAP (2022). Foreign Trade. Retrieved April 28, 2023, https://www.trademap.org/ TÜİK (2021). Tomato Production Quantity. Retrieved March 24, 2022, https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?locale=tr
  46. UNDP (2022). Human Development Report. Retrieved May 22, 2023, https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/global-report-document/hdr2021-22pdf_1.pdf
  47. Van Driesche R & Bellows Jr T S (2012). Biological Control. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1157-7
  48. Varoğlu S T (2022). Agricultural Producers' Approaches to Sustainable Agriculture in Iğdır Province. (Published Doctoral Dissertation, Uludağ University, Institute of Natural Sciences) (In Turkish)
  49. Wang A, Hussain S & Yan J (2024). Evaluating the interlinkage between pesticide residue regulation and agricultural green total factor productivity: empirical insights derived from the threshold effect model. Environment Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04744-w
  50. Wezel A, Casagrande M, Celette F, Vian J F, Ferrer A & Peigné J (2014). Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 34: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0180-7
  51. Wilson G (1989). Family food systems, preventive health and dietary change: a policy to increase the health divide. Journal of Social Policy 18(2): 167-185
  52. Yılmaz H & Tanç Z A (2019). Biological control in pest management in Turkey: Comparison of the attributes of participant and non-participant greenhouse farmers in government-subsidized biological control practices. Future of Food: Journal on Food, Agriculture and Society 7(2): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.17170/kobra-20190709594
  53. Yılmaz H (2014). An Analysis on Factors Influencing government supported Bumble bees use as pollinators by greenhouse producers' in The Mediterranean Coastal Region Of Turkey. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 13(6): 59-70
  54. Yilmaz H (2015a) Farm level analysis of pesticide use in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) growing in west Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 14(3): 115–129
  55. Yilmaz H (2015b). Analysis in terms of environmental awareness of farmers’ decisions and attitudes in pesticide use: The case of Turkey. Bulg. Chem. Commun 47: 771–775