KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership / 2026 / Volume: 11 Issue: 1

University Students as Advocates of Social Justice and Socially Responsible Leaders

Burcu Erdemir(BAHCESEHIR UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-2283-157X
Mehmet Ali Yılık(ORTA DOĞU TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2586-1670
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Such partnerships are essential for empowering students to become proactive agents of change in creating a more equitable society.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Social justice refers to the equitable distribution of resources, opportunities, and rights within a society.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The findings indicate that while students demonstrated a strong awareness of and concern for social injustices, prevailing social and cultural norms often constrained them from taking substantial action.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Such partnerships are essential for empowering students to become proactive agents of change in creating a more equitable society.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:social justice · socially responsible leadership · higher education

Abstract

Social justice refers to the equitable distribution of resources, opportunities, and rights within a society. While it is a commonly held ideal, its realization varies across countries due to differing political, socioeconomic, and geographical conditions, which influence the experience of social injustices. Higher education institutions can play a pivotal role in addressing these injustices and contributing to social transformation through their academic research, educational practices, and the cultivation of civic-minded graduates. This study investigates the relationship between social justice perceptions and socially responsible leadership among university students. Utilizing an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, the research focused on Turkish university students to explore how their understanding of social justice aligns with their readiness to lead responsibly within their communities. The findings indicate that while students demonstrated a strong awareness of and concern for social injustices, prevailing social and cultural norms often constrained them from taking substantial action. This study highlights the necessity of policy initiatives that promote collaboration between the government and universities dedicated to advancing social justice. Such partnerships are essential for empowering students to become proactive agents of change in creating a more equitable society.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Erdemir, B., Yılık, M. A. (2026). University Students as Advocates of Social Justice and Socially Responsible Leaders. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, Volume: 11 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1626059

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (101)

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
  3. Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 312-324.
  4. Altbach, P.G. (2007). Student Politics: Activism and Culture. In James, J.F.F & Philip, G.A. (Eds.). International handbook of higher education (Vol. 1). Springer.
  5. Amorim, J. P., Freires, T., Rodrigues, F., Coimbra, J. L. & Menezes, I. (2023). University social responsibility: A paradox or a vast field of tensions? Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement (27)3, 45-58.
  6. Arar, K., Beycioğlu, K. & Oplatka, I. (2016). A cross-cultural analysis of educational leadership for social justice in Israel and Turkey: Meanings, actions and contexts. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(2), 192-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2016.1168283
  7. Avcı, H., & Gök, E. (2022). Yükseköğretimde yönetişim: Türkiye’de üniversite senatoları ve katılımcılık. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 248-262. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.1160853
  8. Beycioglu, K., & Ogden, S. (2017). Social justice beliefs and behaviors: A cross-cultural look at Turkish and US principals. In P. S. Angelle (Ed.), A global perspective of social justice leadership for school principals (pp. 111–126). Information Age Publishing.
  9. Burak, B. (2024). Turkish higher education in crisis: An analysis of challenges and future prospects. In Rudolph, J., Crawford, J., Sam, CY., Tan, S. (Eds), The Palgrave handbook of crisis leadership in higher education (pp. 563–581). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54509-2_29
  10. Cırık, İ. (2015). Psychometric characteristics of the social justice scale’s Turkish form and a structural equation modelling. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(61), 23-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.61.2
  11. Coelho, M. & Menezes, I. (2022). Universitas: how do students perceive university social responsibility in three European higher education institutions? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(4), 767-782. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-04-2021-0130
  12. CoHE. (2007). Türkiye’nin yükseköğretim stratejisi. [Higher education strategy of Turkey] T.C. Yükseköğretim Kurulu. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Yayinlar/Yayinlarimiz/Turkiyenin-yuksekogretim-stratejisi.pdf
  13. CoHE. (2019). 2018 YKS: Yükseköğretime geçişte il-bölge başarıları ve nüfus hareketliliği raporu. [2018 YKS: Higher Education Transition, Provincial-Regional Success, and Population Mobility Report] https://www.memurlar.net/common/news/documents/803178/2018_yks_ilkarnesi.Pdf
  14. CoHE. (2020). 2020-21 Öğretim yılı yükseköğretim istatistikleri [2020-21 Academic Year Higher Education Statistics. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
  15. CoHE. (2025). Türkiye üniversite deneyim araştırması. [Turkey University Experience Survey.] https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Yayinlar/tuda-ogrenci-turkiye-universite-deneyim-arastirmasi.pdf
  16. Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (4th ed.). Sage.
  17. Creswell, J.W. (2016). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Sage.
  18. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
  19. Çalışkan, Ö. (2020). Ecology of social justice leadership: How schools are responsive to refugee students. Multicultural Education Review, 12(4), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2020.1842656
  20. Çalışkan, Ö., Akın, S., & Engin-Demir, C. (2020). Democratic environment in higher education: The case of a Turkish public university. International Journal of Educational Development, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102129
  21. Çelik, C. & Sünbül, Ö. (2008). Liderlik algılamalarında eğitim ve cinsiyet faktörü: Mersin İlinde bir alan araştırması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3), 49-66. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sduiibfd/issue/20832/223161
  22. Desai, S., & Kulkarni, V. (2008). Changing educational inequalities in India in the context of affirmative action. Demography, 45(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0001
  23. Dugan, J. P. (2015). The measurement of socially responsible leadership: Considerations in establishing psychometric rigor. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 12, 23-42. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2015-012-duga
  24. Earl, J., Maher, T. V., & Elliott, T. (2017). Youth, activism, and social movements. Sociology Compass, 11(4),1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12465
  25. EC. (n.d.) Education and training. The Bologna process and the European higher education area. https://education.ec.europa.eu/levels/higher-education/inclusion-connectivity/bologna-process-european-higher-education-area
  26. EC. (2019). She Figures 2018 Report. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/she-figures-2018_en Einfeld, A., & Collins, D. (2008). The relationships between service-learning, social justice, multicultural competence, and civic engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 49(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2008.0017
  27. Elliott, T., Earl, J., & Maher, T. V. (2017). Recruiting inclusiveness: Intersectionality, social movements, and youth online. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 41, 279-311. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0163-786x20170000041019
  28. Encinas-Martín, M. & Cherian, M. (2023). Gender, education and skills: The persistence of gender gaps in education and skills. OECD Skills Studies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/34680dd5-en
  29. Erdemir, B. & Wu, Q. (2023). An examination of Turkish and Chinese equity-related barriers to higher education admissions from the capabilities perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24, 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09730-9
  30. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor and Francis.
  31. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw Hill.
  32. Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Columbia University Press.
  33. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
  34. Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education: Culture, power, and liberation. Greenwood Publishing Group.
  35. Fuentes, R., Chanthongthip, L., & Rios, F. (2010). Teaching and learning social justice as an “intellectual community” requirement: Pedagogical opportunities and student understandings. Equity and Excellence in Education, 43(3), 357-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2010.492276
  36. Gençoğlu, F., & Yarkın, D. B. (2019). The student movement in Turkey: a case study of the relationship between (re) politicization and democratization. Journal of Youth Studies, 22(5), 658-677. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2018.1535170
  37. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. International Publishers.
  38. Haber, P., & Komives, S. R. (2009). Predicting the individual values of the social change model of leadership development: The role of college students’ leadership and involvement experiences. Journal of Leadership Education, 7(3), 133-166. https://doi.org/10.12806/V7/I3/RF4
  39. Hackman, H. W. (2005). Five essential components for social justice education. Equity and Excellence in Education, 38(2),103-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680590935034
  40. Ham, M., Pap, A., & Štimac, H. (2018). Applying the theory of planned behavior in predicting the intention to implement corporate social responsibility. Innovation Management and Education Excellence through Vision 2020. [Conference paper]. 31st International Business Information Management Association Conference, Milano, Italy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329239658_Applying_the_Theory_of_Planned_Behaviour_in_Predicting_the_Intention_to_Implement_Corporate_Social_Responsibility/citations
  41. Haynes, C. (2017). Dismantling the white supremacy embedded in our classrooms: White faculty in pursuit of more equitable educational outcomes for racially minoritized students. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 87–107.
  42. Hellmann, T., Schmidt, P., & Heller, S.M. (2019). Social justice in the EU and OECD. Index Report 2019 https://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Social-Justice-Index-2019.pdf
  43. HERI. (1996). A social change model of leadership development: Guidebook version III. University of California. Hooks, B. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. South End Press.
  44. Hudler, K., Dennis, L., DiNella, M., Ford, N., Mendez, J., and Long, J. (2021). Intersectional sustainability and student activism: A framework for achieving social sustainability on university campuses. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 16(1), 78-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197919886860
  45. ICEF Monitor. (2017). A closer look at the Turkish outbound market. http://monitor.icef.com/2017/02/field-closer-look-turkish-outbound-market/
  46. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.
  47. Jefferson, R. E., Grant, C. E., Rye, L., Bassette, L. A. Stuve, M., & Neneisen, R. (2018). University students’ perceptions of social justice: The impact of implementing a summer camp for children with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 7(1), 1-21. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/josea/vol7/iss1/6
  48. Junor, S., & A. Usher. (2004). The price of knowledge 2004: Access and student finance in Canada. Montreal: Canada Millennium Scholarship Foundation.
  49. Kamal, K. (2017). Education in Turkey. https://wenr.wes.org/2017/04/education-in-turkey/print/
  50. Kentmen-Cin, Ç., Akbaba, Y., & Saracoglu, B. (2024). Turkey’s gender gap in higher education: An analysis of IR doctoral students. Women’s Studies International Forum, 102, 102863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102863
  51. Knapp, T., Fisher, B. & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2010). Service-learning's impact on college students' commitment to future civic engagement, self-efficacy, and social empowerment. Journal of Community Practice, 18(2), 233-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2010.490152
  52. Komives, S. R., Owen, J. E., Longerbeam, S. D., Mainella, F. C., & Osteen, L. (2005). Developing a leadership identity: A grounded theory. Journal of College Student Development, 46(6), 593-611. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2005.0061
  53. Komives, S. R., & Wagner, W. (Eds.). (2017). Leadership for a better world: Understanding the social change model of leadership development. Jossey-Bass.
  54. Kondakci, Y., & Beycioglu, K. (2020). Social justice in Turkish education system: Issues and interventions. In R. Papa, (Ed.), Handbook on promoting social justice in education (pp. 309-329). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14625-2_34
  55. Kovar, K. A., & Simonsen, J. C. (2019). Factors influencing socially responsible leadership development in college of agriculture students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(4), 88-100. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.04088
  56. Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(1), 58-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295211007
  57. Külekçi, E. & Özgan, H. (2015). Adaptation of the socially responsible leadership scale to Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Uluslararası Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(3), 61-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.16991/INESJOURNAL.29
  58. Kyambade, M., Namuddu, R., Mugambwa, J., & Namatovu, A. (2024). Psychological safety and innovative work behavior: does socially responsible leadership matter? SEISENSE Business Review, 4(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.33215/6gahb262
  59. LaMont, J. Jr. (2019). Academics, experts share diversity dreams for 2019. Diverse Issues in Higher Education. https://www.diverseeducation.com/latest-news/article/15103870/academics-experts-share-diversity-dreams-for-2019
  60. Maher, T. V., & Earl, J. (2019). Barrier or booster? Digital media, social networks, and youth micromobilization. Sociological Perspectives, 62(6), 865-883. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419867697
  61. Maleki, A., & Hendriks, F. (2015). The relation between cultural values and models of democracy: A cross-national study. Democratization, 22(6), 981–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.893426
  62. Marginson, S. (2011). Equity, status and freedom: A note on higher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2010.549456
  63. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. (3rd ed.) Sage.
  64. MoNE. (2020). National education statistics. Formal education 2020/21. http://www.meb.gov.tr
  65. OECD. (2020). Education policy outlook: Turkey. https://www.oecd.org/turkey/country-profile-Turkey-2020.pdf Omoto, A. M., & Malsch, A. M. (2005). Psychological sense of community: Conceptual issues and connections to volunteerism-related activism. In A. M. Omoto (Ed.), Processes of community change and social action (pp. 83–103). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  66. Pinheiro, S., Rosa, M., Menezes, I., & Magalhães, A. (2024). Sustainability concerns of Portuguese higher education institutions: How are they planning to contribute to a more sustainable world. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 15(2), 179-203.
  67. Polat, S. (2017). The expansion of higher education in Turkey: Access, equality and regional returns to education. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 43(C), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2017.06.001
  68. Rankin, B. H., & Aytac, I. A. (2006). Gender inequality in schooling: The case of Turkey. Sociology of Education, 79(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070607900102
  69. Reason, R. D., Ryder, A. J., & Kee, C. (2013). Higher education’s role in educa¬tion for personal and social responsibility: A review of existing literature. New Directions for Higher Education, 164, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20072
  70. Robbins, C. K. (2016). White women, racial identity, and learning about racism in graduate preparation programs. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 53(3), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2016.1143834
  71. Roberts, M. R., Turner, W., Howard, L. A., Gilles, E. E., & Statham, A. (2019). Gender and social justice: An examination of attitudes and behaviors among undergraduate liberal arts students. Journal of Women and Social Work, 34(4), 552-567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109919866151
  72. Rodgers, G., Lee, E., Swepston, L., & Daele, J.V. (2009). The international labor organization and the quest for social justice, 1919-2009. Cornell University Press.
  73. Rodriguez, A.J., Ciftci, A., Howell, K., Kokini, K., Wright, B., & Nikalje, A. (2022). Promoting equity, diversity and social justice through faculty-led transformative projects. Innovative Higher Education, 47, 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09560-y
  74. Salmi, J. (2020). Higher education and inclusion, background paper prepared for the 2020 global education monitoring report inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373689
  75. Salmi, J. & D’Addio, A. (2021). Policies for achieving inclusion in higher education. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5(1), 47-72, https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2020.1835529
  76. Sanders-McDonagh, E., & Davis, C. (2018). Resisting neoliberal policies in UK higher education: Exploring the impact of critical pedagogies on non-traditional students in a post-1992 university. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 13(3), 217-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197918793061
  77. Sarid, A. (2024). Crossing boundaries: connecting adaptive leadership and social justice leadership for educational contexts. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 27(5), 1009-1030, https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1942995
  78. Selvamani, L., Dhilipan, C., Divyalakshmi, G., Lakshmi, J., & Krishna, V. B. (2024). Exploring the role of self-determination theory and theory of planned behavior in understanding the link between spiritual motivation and university-industry collaboration. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 37(5), 988-1011. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2023-0181
  79. Shaw, D. & Shiu, E. (2003). Ethics in consumer choice: A multivariate modelling approach. European Journal of Marketing, 37(10), 1485–1498. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310487202
  80. Shields, C. M. (2014). Leadership for social justice education: A critical transformative approach. In Bogotch I., & Shields C. (Eds). International handbook of educational leadership and social (in) justice (pp.323-339). Springer International Handbooks of Education, Vol 29. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6555-9_19
  81. Shu, C.H., Lam, C.W., Yeung, L., Mo, K. & Siu, J. (2019). Assessing the attitude and behaviors of social work students towards social justice. https://repository.cihe.edu.hk/jspui/handle/cihe/73
  82. Sönmez, B., İspir, Ö., Azizoğlu, F., Hapçıoğlu, S. B., & Yıldırım, A. (2019). Socially responsible leadership: A study with nursing and medical students in Turkey. Nurse Education in Practice, 36, 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.03.014
  83. Symaco, L. P., & Tee, M. Y. (2019). Social responsibility and engagement in higher education: Case of the ASEAN. International Journal of Educational Development, 66, 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.10.001
  84. Tan, M. G. (2007). Women, education and development in Turkey. In M. Carlson, A. Rabo, & F. Gök (Eds). Education in multicultural societies Turkish and Swedish perspectives (pp. 109-124). Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul.
  85. The World Bank. (2020). School enrolment, tertiary (% gross)-Turkey. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.TER.ENRR?locations=TR Torres-Harding, S. R., Steele, C., Schulz, E., Taha, F., & Pico, C. (2014). Student perceptions of social justice and social justice activities. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 9(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197914520655
  86. Torres-Harding, S. R. & Siers, B. & Olson, B.D. (2012). Development and psychometric evaluation of the social justice scale (SJS). American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(1-2), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-011-9478-2
  87. TÜİK. (2015). Turkey with statistics 2015. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/7330775/7339623/Turkey+_in_statistics_2015.pdf/317c6386-e51c-45de-85b0-ff671e3760f8
  88. TÜİK. (2020). International migration statistics 2019. https://data.tuik.gov.tr
  89. TÜİK. (2021). Labor force statistics March 2021. https://data.tuik.gov.tr
  90. TÜİK. (2024). Labor force statistics April 2024. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Isgucu-Istatistikleri-Nisan-2024-53511#:~:text=İşgücüne%20katılma%20oranı%20erkeklerde%20%72,kadınlarda%20%36%2C6%20oldu.&text=15%2D24%20yaş%20grubunu%20kapsayan,19%2C1%20olarak%20tahmin%20edildi.
  91. TÜİK & UN Women. (2024). Women in Türkiye: A statistical overview 2024. UN Women and TURKSAT. https://eca.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2025/03/women-in-turkiye-a-statistical-overview-2024
  92. Tuitt, F. (2016). Conclusion-Inclusive pedagogy 2.0: Implications for race, equity, and higher education in a global context. In Tuitt, F., Haynes, C., & Stewart, S. (Eds.), Race, equity, and the learning environment: The global relevance of critical and inclusive pedagogies in higher education (1st ed.). Routledge.
  93. Tyree, T.M. (1998). Designing an instrument to measure socially responsible leadership using the social change model of leadership development. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland].
  94. UN. (2017). SDG indicators: Global indicator framework for the sustainable development goals and targets of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list/.
  95. UNDP (2022). Human Development 2022. https://www.undp.org/turkiye/publications/2022-human-development-report
  96. UNESCO (2015). Not just hot air: Putting climate change education into practice. France.
  97. UNICEF. (2015). Empowering women empowering humanity. https://www.unicef.org/turkey/en/press-releases/empowering-women-empowering-humanity
  98. Uzun, B., & Keçecioğlu, Z. (2024). Mobilising youth for elections: electoral inclusion of youth in Turkey under competitive authoritarianism. Third World Quarterly, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2024.2399290
  99. Wei, M. (2020). Educational equity: A comparative study of college entrance exam between China and the US from the perspective of media. International and Comparative Education, 7(1), 1826620. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1826620
  100. World Economic Forum (2023). Global Gender Gap Report 2023. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2023.pdf
  101. Yağcı, Y. (2010). A different view of the Bologna process: The case of Turkey. European Journal of Education, 45(4), 588-600. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40980976