KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Interdisciplinary Medical Journal / 2025 / Volume: 16 Issue: 56

Morphometric characterization of the pterygomaxillary junction: an anatomical study

Nazire Kılıç Şafak(Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Adana, Türkiye)
Gamze Taşkın Şenol(Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Bolu, Türkiye)
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-16
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Detailed knowledge of this region is clinically important, particularly in procedures such as Le Fort I osteotomy, due to its proximity to the maxillary artery and the risk of excessive bleeding.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The pterygomaxillary junction (PMJ) is a triangular cleft between the maxilla and pterygoid process of the sphenoid bone, serving as a transition point between the infratemporal and pterygopalatine fossae.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: Fissure-type bilateral PMJ was observed in 92.5% of 40 cases and bilateral synostosis in 7.5%.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Detailed knowledge of this region is clinically important, particularly in procedures such as Le Fort I osteotomy, due to its proximity to the maxillary artery and the risk of excessive bleeding.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Le Fort · maxilla · osteotomy

Abstract

Objective: The pterygomaxillary junction (PMJ) is a triangular cleft between the maxilla and pterygoid process of the sphenoid bone, serving as a transition point between the infratemporal and pterygopalatine fossae. The terminal branches of the maxillary artery pass through this region to reach the pterygopalatine fossa. The aim of this study was to investigate the morphometric characteristics of the PMJ. Method: Forty human skulls of unknown sex and age from the Çukurova and Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Departments of Anatomy were examined. After identifying the PMJ type (fissure or synostosis), the PMJ width and height, and maxillary tuberosity height were measured using a caliper. The data were then statistically analyzed. Results: Fissure-type bilateral PMJ was observed in 92.5% of 40 cases and bilateral synostosis in 7.5%. The mean PMJ height was 16.58 mm, the mean width was 5.02 mm, height of the posterior maxilla was 21.27 mm, and the average maxillary tuberosity height was 5.19 mm. No statistically significant differences were found between the right- and left-sided measurements (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The findings of this study contribute to our understanding of the PMJ. Detailed knowledge of this region is clinically important, particularly in procedures such as Le Fort I osteotomy, due to its proximity to the maxillary artery and the risk of excessive bleeding.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Şafak, N. K., Şenol, G. T. (2025). Morphometric characterization of the pterygomaxillary junction: an anatomical study. Interdisciplinary Medical Journal, Volume: 16 Issue: 56. https://doi.org/10.17944/interdiscip.1695139

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (21)

  1. Arıncı K, Elhan A. Anatomi. Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri; 2014. p. 30–57.
  2. Yücel AH. Dere Anatomi Atlası ve Ders Kitabı. Ankara: Akademisyen Yayınevi; 2018. p. 489–537.
  3. Cheung LK, Fung SC, Li T, Samman N. Posterior maxillary anatomy: implications for Le Fort I osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;27:346–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(98)80062-3
  4. Sindel A, Aytac G, Ogut E, Gurcay S, Sindel M. Pterygomaxillary junction: morphometric analysis and clinical aspect. Int J Anat Var. 2017;10:62–3.
  5. Hiranuma Y, Yamamoto Y, Iizuka T. Strain distribution during separation of the pterygomaxillary suture by osteotomes: comparison between Obwegeser’s osteotome and Swan’s neck osteotome. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg. 1988;16:13–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(88)80007-6
  6. Weiss RO, Ong AA, Reddy LV, Bahmanyar S, Vincent AG, Ducic Y. Orthognathic surgery—Le Fort I osteotomy. Facial Plast Surg. 2021;37:703–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735308
  7. Drommer RB. The history of the “Le Fort I” osteotomy. J Maxillofac Surg. 1986;14:119–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(86)80275-2
  8. Colreavy MP, Baker T, Campbell M, Murphy M, Lyons B. The safety and effectiveness of the Le Fort I approach to removing central skull base lesions. Ear Nose Throat J. 2001;80:315–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/014556130108000508
  9. Breeze J, Linares CV, Stockton P. Is an osteotome necessary for pterygomaxillary dysjunction or dysjunction through the tuberosity during Le Fort I osteotomy? A systematic review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54:248–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.11.014
  10. Chin YP, Leno MB, Dumrongwongsiri S, Chung KH, Lin HH, Lo LJ. The pterygomaxillary junction: an imaging study for surgical information of LeFort I osteotomy. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-0592-8
  11. Ayhan M, Taşyapan SA, Kundakçıoğlu A, et al. Radiological examination of the relationship between the pterygomaxillary junction and fracture pattern. Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023;29:149–54. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2022.45995
  12. Bendor-Samuel R, Chen YR, Chen PKT. Unusual complications of the Le Fort I osteotomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:1289–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199511000-00009
  13. Ueki K, Hashiba Y, Marukawa K, et al. Assessment of pterygomaxillary separation in Le Fort I osteotomy in class III patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:833–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.11.019
  14. Stajčić Z. Altering the angulation of a curved osteotome—Does it have effects on the type of pterygomaxillary disjunction in Le Fort I osteotomy? An experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;20:301–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80160-2
  15. Neema B, Olabu BO, Butt FM, Idenya PM, Cheruiyot I, Misiani M. Computed tomography scan assessment of the anatomy of the pterygomaxillary junction and its relevance in Le Fort I osteotomy. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31:17–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006588
  16. Apinhasmit W, Chompoopong S, Methathrathip D, Sangvichien S, Karuwanarint S. Clinical anatomy of the posterior maxilla pertaining to Le Fort I osteotomy in Thais. Clin Anat. 2005;18:323–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20131
  17. Kim DY, Cho YC, Sung IY, et al. Anatomic study of pterygomaxillary junctions in Koreans. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;35:368–75. https://doi.org/10.14402/jkamprs.2013.35.6.368
  18. Dadwal H, Shanmugasundaram S, Krishnakumar RVB. Preoperative and postoperative CT scan assessment of pterygomaxillary junction in patients undergoing Le Fort I osteotomy: comparison of pterygomaxillary dysjunction technique and Trimble technique—a pilot study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015;14:713–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-014-0720-y
  19. Oliveira GQV, Rossi MA, Vasconcelos TV, Neves FS, Crusoé-Rebello I. Cone beam computed tomography assessment of the pterygomaxillary region and palatine canal for Le Fort I osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46:1017–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.030
  20. Jasim HH. Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of maxillary tuberosity after the extraction of maxillary third molars. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2020;9:19–22. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2020/440
  21. Manzanera E, Llorca P, Manzanera D, García-Sanz V, Sada V, Paredes-Gallardo V. Anatomical study of the maxillary tuberosity using cone beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2018;34:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-017-0284-x