KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türk Diş Hekimliği Araştırma Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Düzeltme: Peri-implant Yumuşak Doku Defektleri: Etiyolojisi, Sonuçları ve Tedavi Yaklaşımları

Düzeltme: Peri-implant Soft Tissue Defects (PSTDs): Etiology, Implications and Treatment Options

Gencay Kaan Bıkmaz(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ)0009-0008-8060-0407
Nejat Nizam(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-2739-3919
Sayfa
163–163
Yayın Tarihi
2026-05-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Dolayısıyla, biyolojik prensiplere dayalı ve hasta odaklı yaklaşımlar uzun dönemli fonksiyonel ve estetik başarıyı mümkün kılmaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Peri-implant yumuşak doku defektleri, implant diş hekimliğinde estetik ve biyolojik sonuçlara olan etkilerinden dolayı gün geçtikçe önemi artan bir klinik durumdur.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Peri-implant mukozanın doğal diş etine kıyasla gösterdiği yapısal farklılıklar, bu bölgede inflamasyon ve doku kaybına karşı daha zayıf bir bariyer oluşmasına neden olur.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Dolayısıyla, biyolojik prensiplere dayalı ve hasta odaklı yaklaşımlar uzun dönemli fonksiyonel ve estetik başarıyı mümkün kılmaktadır.
🔬Tür:Deneysel Tarla Denemesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Peri-implant yumuşak doku defektleri · Keratinize mukoza · Mukozal çekilme

Özet

Peri-implant yumuşak doku defektleri, implant diş hekimliğinde estetik ve biyolojik sonuçlara olan etkilerinden dolayı gün geçtikçe önemi artan bir klinik durumdur. Bu defektlerin gelişiminde; hastaya bağlı yumuşak doku özellikleri, yetersiz keratinize mukoza varlığı, implantın pozisyonel hataları ve restoratif tasarım unsurları belirleyici rol oynar. Peri-implant mukozanın doğal diş etine kıyasla gösterdiği yapısal farklılıklar, bu bölgede inflamasyon ve doku kaybına karşı daha zayıf bir bariyer oluşmasına neden olur. Bu derlemede, peri-implant yumuşak doku defektlerinin oluşum mekanizmaları, biyolojik ve klinik yansımaları ile güncel tedavi stratejileri bütüncül bir bakış açısıyla ele alınmıştır. Özellikle peri-implant fenotipin bir parçası olan keratinize mukoza genişliği ve mukoza kalınlığının, doku stabilitesi ve iltihabi süreçlerin kontrolü üzerindeki belirleyici etkisi vurgulanmıştır. Tedavi yaklaşımlarında, cerrahi teknik kadar cerrahın uygulama becerisi ve vaka bazlı planlama da başarıyı doğrudan etkileyen unsurlar arasında yer almaktadır. Dolayısıyla, biyolojik prensiplere dayalı ve hasta odaklı yaklaşımlar uzun dönemli fonksiyonel ve estetik başarıyı mümkün kılmaktadır.

Abstract

Peri-implant soft tissue defects represent a growing concern in implant dentistry due to their impact on both biological function and esthetic outcomes. These complications often arise from a combination of patientspecific soft tissue characteristics, insufficient keratinized mucosa, implant positioning errors, and restorative design factors. Compared to the gingiva surrounding natural teeth, peri-implant mucosa exhibits structural limitations that increase its susceptibility to inflammation and breakdown. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the etiological mechanisms, biological and clinical implications, and current treatment strategies for peri-implant soft tissue defects. In particular, the critical influence of keratinized mucosa width and mucosal thickness -key components of the peri-implant phenotypeon tissue stability and control of inflammatory processes is emphasized. Treatment success depends not only on the selected surgical technique but also on clinician skill and case-specific planning. Therefore, biologically based and patient-centered approaches enable long-term functional and esthetic success.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Bıkmaz, G. K., Nizam, N. (2026). Düzeltme: Peri-implant Yumuşak Doku Defektleri: Etiyolojisi, Sonuçları ve Tedavi Yaklaşımları. Türk Diş Hekimliği Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 163–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/1622044

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (43)

  1. Brito C, Tenenbaum HC, Wong BKC, Schmitt C, Nogueira- Filho G. Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri-implant health? A systematic review of the literature. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014;102(3):643-650.
  2. Sculean A, Gruber R, Bosshardt DD. Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41:S6-S22.
  3. Salvi GE, Aglietta M, Eick S, Sculean A, Lang NP, Ramseier CA. Reversibility of experimental peri-implant mucositis compared with experimental gingivitis in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(2):182-190.
  4. Chackartchi T, Romanos GE, Sculean A. Soft tissue-related complications and management around dental implants. Periodontol 2000. 2019;81(1):124-138.
  5. Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, Stefanini M, et al. Classification of facial peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence/deficiencies at single implant sites in the esthetic zone. J Periodontol. 2019;90(9):807-820.
  6. Liu Z, Li C, Liu Y, et al. The clinical significance and application of the peri-implant phenotype in dental implant surgery: a narrative review. Ann Transl Med. 2023;11(10):351.
  7. Amo FSL del, Lin GH, Monje A, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL. Influence of Soft Tissue Thickness on Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis. J Periodontol. 2016;87(6):690-699.
  8. Jung R, Holderegger C, Sailer I, Khraisat A, Suter A, Hämmerle C. The effect of all-ceramic and porcelainfused- to-metal restorations on marginal peri-implant soft tissue color: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. Published online 2008.
  9. Puisys A, Linkevicius T. The influence of mucosal tissue thickening on crestal bone stability around bone-level implants. A prospective controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(2):123-129. doi:10.1111/ CLR.12301
  10. Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, et al. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29 Suppl 15:32-49.
  11. Tomasi C, Tessarolo F, Caola I, Wennström J, Nollo G, Berglundh T. Morphogenesis of peri-implant mucosa revisited: an experimental study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(9):997-1003.
  12. Aizcorbe-Vicente J, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Canullo L, Soto- Peñaloza D, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Influence of Facial Bone Thickness After Implant Placement into the Healed Ridges on the Remodeled Facial Bone and Considering Soft Tissue Recession: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(1):107-119.
  13. Rungtanakiat P, Thitaphanich N, Janda M, Strauss FJ, Arksornnukit M, Mattheos N. Association of Peri-Implant Mucosa Dimensions With Emergence Profile Angles of the Implant Prosthesis. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024;10(4).
  14. Siegenthaler M, Strauss FJ, Gamper F, Hämmerle CHF, Jung RE, Thoma DS. Anterior implant restorations with a convex emergence profile increase the frequency of recession: 12-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2022;49(11):1145-1157.
  15. Chen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(1):186-196.
  16. Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC. A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(5):552-562.
  17. Cordaro L, Torsello F, Roccuzzo M. Clinical outcome of submerged vs. non-submerged implants placed in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(12):1307-1313.
  18. Ferreira PW, Nogueira PJ, Nobre MADA, Guedes CM, Salvado F. Impact of Mechanical Complications on Success of Dental Implant Treatments: A Case–Control Study. Eur J Dent. 2021;16(1):179.
  19. Linkevicius T, Vaitelis J. The effect of zirconia or titanium as abutment material on soft peri-implant tissues: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26 Suppl 11:139-147.
  20. Bosshardt DD, Lang NP. The Junctional Epithelium: from Health to Disease. J Dent Res. 2005;84(1):9-20.
  21. Choe S, Ma T, Jones D, Shiau HJ, Saito H. Peri-implant mucosal tissue attachment: Narrative review. Dentistry Review. 2024;4(3):100141.
  22. Mombelli A, Mühle T, Brägger U, Lang NP, Bürgin WB. Comparison of periodontal and peri-implant probing by depth-force pattern analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8(6):448-454. doi:10.1034/J.1600- 0501.1997.080602.X
  23. Moon IS, Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Linder E, Lindhe J. The barrier between the keratinized mucosa and the dental implant. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 1999;26(10):658-663.
  24. Mazzotti C, Stefanini M, Felice P, Bentivogli V, Mounssif I, Zucchelli G. Soft-tissue dehiscence coverage at periimplant sites. Periodontol 2000. 2018;77(1):256-272.
  25. Ramanauskaite A, Schwarz F, Sader R. Influence of width of keratinized tissue on the prevalence of peri-implant diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(S23):8-31.
  26. Schrott AR, Jimenez M, Hwang JW, Fiorellini J, Weber HP. Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft-tissue health and stability around implants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(10):1170-1177.
  27. Monje A, Blasi G. Significance of keratinized mucosa/ gingiva on peri-implant and adjacent periodontal conditions in erratic maintenance compliers. J Periodontol. 2019;90(5):445-453.
  28. Ravidà A, Arena C, Tattan M, et al. The role of keratinized mucosa width as a risk factor for peri-implant disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022;24(3):287-300.
  29. Lee JS, Jeon YS, Strauss FJ, Jung HI, Gruber R. Digital scanning is more accurate than using a periodontal probe to measure the keratinized tissue width. Scientific Reports 2020 10:1. 2020;10(1):1-8.
  30. Monje A, González-Martín O, Avila-Ortiz G. Impact of peri-implant soft tissue characteristics on health and esthetics. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(2):356-366.
  31. Monje A, González-Martín O, Avila-Ortiz G. Impact of peri-implant soft tissue characteristics on health and esthetics. Published online 2023.
  32. Tarnow D, Hochman M, Chu S, Fletcher P. A New Definition of Attached Gingiva Around Teeth and Implants in Healthy and Diseased Sites. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2021;41(1):43-49.
  33. Fons-Badal C, Agustín-Panadero R, Labaig-Rueda C, Solá- Ruiz MF, García-Selva M, Fons Font A. The Influence of Keratinized Mucosa on the Nonsurgical Therapeutic Treatment of Peri-Implantitis. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2022, Vol 11, Page 4118. 2022;11(14):4118.
  34. Gamborena I, Avila-Ortiz G. Peri-implant marginal mucosa defects: Classification and clinical management. J Periodontol. 2021;92(7):947-957.
  35. Zucchelli G, Mazzotti C, Mounssif I, Mele M, Stefanini M, Montebugnoli L. A novel surgical-prosthetic approach for soft tissue dehiscence coverage around single implant. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(9):957-962.
  36. Roccuzzo M, Gaudioso L, Bunino M, Dalmasso P. Surgical treatment of buccal soft tissue recessions around single implants: 1-year results from a prospective pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(6):641-646.
  37. Lee CT, Hamalian T, Schulze-Späte U. Minimally invasive treatment of soft tissue deficiency around an implantsupported restoration in the esthetic zone: modified VISTA technique case report. J Oral Implantol. 2015;41(1):71-76.
  38. Anderson LE, Inglehart MR, El-Kholy K, Eber R, Wang HL. Implant associated soft tissue defects in the anterior maxilla: a randomized control trial comparing subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft. Implant Dent. 2014;23(4):416-425.
  39. Le B, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Nielsen B. Treatment of Labial Soft Tissue Recession Around Dental Implants in the Esthetic Zone Using Guided Bone Regeneration With Mineralized Allograft: A Retrospective Clinical Case Series. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(8):1552-1561.
  40. Giammarinaro E, Baldini N, Covani U, Menini M, Pesce P, Marconcini S. Does platelet‐rich fibrin enhance the outcomes of peri-implant soft tissues? A systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):615.
  41. Azhibekov A, Menchisheva Y, Espolayeva A, Uglanov Z, Tsokov KT, Mirzakulova U. The Efficacy of Leukocyte- Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Combination with Sub-Epithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Open Dent J. 2024;18(1).
  42. Zadeh HH. Minimally invasive treatment of maxillary anterior gingival recession defects by vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access and platelet-derived growth factor BB. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 2011;31(6):653-660.
  43. Silva CO, Ribeiro ÉDP, Sallum AW, Tatakis DN. Free Gingival Grafts: Graft Shrinkage and Donor-Site Healing in Smokers and Non-Smokers. J Periodontol. 2010;81(5):692-701.