Dergiler / Göğüs Kalp Damar Anestezi ve Yoğun Bakım Derneği Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Preoperative Evaluation of The Patients with Cardiovascular Disease Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery

Nonkardiyak Cerrahi Geçirecek Kardiyovasküler Hastalığı Olan Hastaların Preoperatif Değerlendirilmesi

Sayfa
16–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Besides use of risk indices and algorithms can reduce the requirement for consultation and request for unnecessary laboratory or imaging tests and can prevent unnecessary cancellation or delaying of the surgery.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Preoperative evaluation of the patients with cardiac problems who will undergo noncardiac surgery is crucial.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: The mean age in the group with morbidity (69.3±10.6 years) was significantly higher than that in the group without morbidity (64.0±12.1 years) (p<0.001).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Besides use of risk indices and algorithms can reduce the requirement for consultation and request for unnecessary laboratory or imaging tests and can prevent unnecessary cancellation or delaying of the surgery.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Preoperative evaluation of the patients with cardiac problems who will undergo noncardiac surgery is crucial. The aim of our study is to investigate the relationship between cardiac risk determined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, Goldman scoring system, and the cardiology consultation, and the perioperative mortality and morbidity. Material and Method: Five hundred patients undergoing noncardiac surgery for whom cardiology consultation requested were studied prospectively. The relationship between the patients’ ASA classes, Goldman scores, cardiac risks, comorbidities, operation types, preoperative cardiac symptoms, and perioperative morbidity and mortality was assessed. Results: The mean age in the group with morbidity (69.3±10.6 years) was significantly higher than that in the group without morbidity (64.0±12.1 years) (p<0.001). There was no perioperative mortality while in 354 (70.8%) of 500 patients cardiovascular complications developed.While a significant difference between operation type of both groups was observed (p=0.001), preoperative hypertension was more frequently seen in the morbidity group (p=0.007). Preoperative ASA classes (p=0.016), Goldman scores (p<0.001), and cardiac risks of patients (p=0.039) were significantly different between the groups. Logistic regression analysis was applied, and only age, hypertension, and operation type were found to be risk factors for perioperative morbidity. Conclusion: We believe that ASA classification, Goldman Cardiac Risk Index, and cardiac risk determined by the cardiologists can affect the patients’ perioperative management . Besides use of risk indices and algorithms can reduce the requirement for consultation and request for unnecessary laboratory or imaging tests and can prevent unnecessary cancellation or delaying of the surgery.

Abstract

Amaç: Nonkardiyak cerrahi geçirecek kardiyak sorunlu hastaların preoperatif değerlendirmesi oldukça kritiktir. Çalışmamızın amacı, Amerikan Anestezistler Derneği (ASA) sınıflaması, Goldman skorlama sistemi ve kardiyoloji konsültasyonu ile belirlenen kardiyak risk ile perioperative mortalite ve morbidite arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Nonkardiyak cerrahi geçirecek, kardiyoloji konsültasyonu istenen 500 hasta prospektif olarak çalışmaya alındı. Hastaların ASA sınıfları, Goldman skorları, kardiyak riskleri, komorbiditeleri, operasyon tipleri, preoperative kardiyak semptomları ile perioperative mortalite ve morbidite arasındaki ilişki değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Morbidite gelişen grupta ortalama yaş (69.3±10.6) morbidite gelişmeyen gruba göre (64.0±12.1) anlamlı olarak yüksekti (p<0.001). Çalışmamızda perioperative mortalite gözlenmezken, 500 hastanın 354 (%70,8) ünde kardiyovasküler komplikasyon gelişti. Ameliyat tipi açısından iki grup arasında anlamlı farklılık gözlenirken (p=0.001), preoperatif hipertansiyon varlığı morbidite gelişen grupta daha sıktı (p=0.007). İki grubun preoperatif ASA sınıfları (p=0.016), Goldman skorları (p<0.001) ve kardiyoloji konsültasyon riskleri (p=0.039) anlamlı olarak farklıydı. Yapılan lojistik regresyon analizinde yalnızca yaş, hipertansiyon ve operasyon tipinin perioperative morbidite için risk faktörü olabileceği gösterildi. Sonuç: ASA sınıflaması, Goldman kardiyak risk indeksi ve kardiyolog tarafından belirlenen kardiyak risk, hastaların perioperatif yönetimini etkileyebilir. Ayrıca risk indeksleri ile algoritimlerin kullanımının, konsültasyon gereksinimini azaltarak gereksiz laboratuvar ve görüntüleme tetkiki istemini dolayısıyla cerrahinin gereksiz ertelenme ve iptalini önleyebileceğini düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CAN, M. G., KOÇYİGİT, Ö. I., HAYIRLIOĞLU, M. B., KOÇYİĞİT, M., KAYHAN, Z. (2018). Preoperative Evaluation of The Patients with Cardiovascular Disease Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery. Göğüs Kalp Damar Anestezi ve Yoğun Bakım Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 16–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/161837

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Devereaux PJ, Sessler DI. Cardiac complications in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2258-69.
  2. Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK. Preoperative evaluation and management. Clinical Anesthesia. Fifth edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006:475-83
  3. American Society of Anesthesiologists. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology. 1963;24:111
  4. Lewin I, Lerner AG, Green SH, Del Guercio LR, Siegel JH. Physical class and physiologic status in the prediction of operative mortality in the aged sick. Ann Surg. 1971;174:217-31.
  5. Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med. 1977;297:845-50.
  6. Detsky AS, Abrams HB, McLaughlin JR. Predicting cardiac complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:211-9.
  7. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncariac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:1043-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.100.10.1043 8. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, Bozkurt B, Davila-Roman VG, Gerhard-Herman MD, Holly TA, Kane GC, Marine JE, Nelson MT, Spencer CC, Thompson A, Ting HH, Uretsky BF, Wijeysundera DN; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 9;64(22):77-137
  8. Smilowitz NR, Gupta N, Ramakrishna H, Guo Y, Berger JS, Bangalore S. Perioperative Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events associated with noncardiac surgery. JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;2(2): 181-7.
  9. Gilbert K, Larocque B, Lawrence T. Prospective evaluation of cardiac risk indices for patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:356-9.
  10. Braunwald E. Personal reflections on efforts to reduce ischemic myocardial damage. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 56:332-8.
  11. Vanzetto G,