Dergiler / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

The Determinants of Business Analytics Adoption: Does One-Size Fit All?

Sayfa
583–598
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings illustrate to both managers and BA system providers that under different organizational cultures, users’ needs and perceptions vary; therefore different BA system quality characteristics should be emphasized for successful implementation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose – This paper aims to improve the understanding about business analytics (BA) adoption by utilizing a contingency perspective examining the interplay between individual-, system-, and organizational-level determinants through the combined theoretical lenses of technology acceptance model (TAM) and IS quality model.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Design/methodology/approach – Data was collected by means of a survey conducted among BA tools users working in a variety of industries in Turkey and 91 responses were obtained.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings illustrate to both managers and BA system providers that under different organizational cultures, users’ needs and perceptions vary; therefore different BA system quality characteristics should be emphasized for successful implementation.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Purpose – This paper aims to improve the understanding about business analytics (BA) adoption by utilizing a contingency perspective examining the interplay between individual-, system-, and organizational-level determinants through the combined theoretical lenses of technology acceptance model (TAM) and IS quality model. Design/methodology/approach – Data was collected by means of a survey conducted among BA tools users working in a variety of industries in Turkey and 91 responses were obtained. The moderating effect of an organizational level contingency – analytical decision-making culture (ADMC) – on the relationships between individual- and system-level factors was tested via the partial least squares (PLS) method. Findings – The results provide strong support for the moderating effect of an organizational-level contingency – analytical decision-making culture (ADMC). More specifically, we find that in low ADMC environments, information quality improves perceived usefulness whereas performance quality and interaction quality improve perceived ease-of-use. Surprisingly, in high ADMC environments information quality does not have an effect on perceived usefulness or perceived easeof- use, whereas performance quality improves perceived usefulness and interaction quality improves both perceived usefulness and perceived ease-of-use. Discussion – This study is one of the few to examine the increasingly popular BA adoption issue in a developing country context. The findings illustrate to both managers and BA system providers that under different organizational cultures, users’ needs and perceptions vary; therefore different BA system quality characteristics should be emphasized for successful implementation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAYRAM, N., ATEŞ, M. (2020). The Determinants of Business Analytics Adoption: Does One-Size Fit All?. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 583–598. https://ajindex.com/articles/161659

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Alhirz, S. (2015). “Do cultural dimensions differentiate ERP acceptance? A study in the context of Saudi Arabia”, Information Technology & People, 28 (1), 163-194.
  2. Alomari, M., Woods, P. and Sandhu, K. (2012). “Predictors for e-government adoption in Jordan: Deployment of an empirical evaluation based on a citizen-centric approach”, Information Technology & People, 25 (2), 207-234.
  3. Arnott, D., Lizama, F. and Song, Y. (2017). “Patterns of business intelligence systems use in organizations”, Decision Support Systems, 97 (May), 58-68.
  4. Bach, M.P., Čeljo, A. and Zoroja, J. (2016). “Technology acceptance model for business intelligence systems: Preliminary research”, Procedia Computer Science, 100, 995-1001. Božič, K. and Dimovski, V. (2019). “Business intelligence and analytics for value creation: The role of absorptive capacity”, International Journal of Information Management, 46 (June), 93-103.
  5. Busse, C., Kach, A.P. and Wagner, S.M. (2017). “Boundary conditions: What they are, how to explore them, why we need them, and when to consider them”, Organizational Research Methods, 20 (4), 574-609.
  6. Brandon-Jones, A. and Kauppi, K. (2018). "Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38 (1), 22-42.
  7. Burns, T. and Stalker, G. M. (1961). “The Management of Innovation”, London, Tavistock. Calisir, F., Altin Gumussoy, C., Bayraktaroglu, A.E. and Karaali, D. (2014). “Predicting the intention to use a web-based learning system: perceived content quality, anxiety, perceived system quality, image, and the technology acceptance model”, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 24 (5), 515-531.
  8. Cao, G. and Duan, Y. (2017). "How do top- and bottom-performing companies differ in using business analytics?", Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30 (6), 874-892.
  9. Chin, W.W. (1998). “The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modelling,” in: G.A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, London, Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, 295- 336. Côrte-Real, N., Ruivo, P., Oliveira, T. and Popovič, A. (2019). “Unlocking the drivers of big data analytics value in firms”, Journal of Business Research, 97 (April), 160-173.
  10. Çelik, H.E. and Yilmaz, V. (2011). "Extending the technology acceptance model for adoption of e-shopping by consumers in Turkey", Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 12(2), 152-164.
  11. Daradkeh, M.K. (2018). “Deter