KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Effect of Total Versus Partial Assisted Hatching on the Clinical Pregnancy Rates in Assisted Reproduction Technology

Bülent Emre BİLGİÇ
ENİS ÖZKAYA
Çiğdem YAYLA ABİDE
Semra KAYATAS ESER
İlhan ŞANVERDİ
Tayfun KUTLU
Sayfa
22–27
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Keywords: Assisted hatching, Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Implantation, In vitro fertilization, Partial and total assisted hatching

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of total or partial assisted hatch- ing on the clinical pregnancy rates in assisted reproduction technology.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:STUDY DESIGN: This was a case-control study conducted from the beginning of January 2016 to the end of June 2017.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Keywords: Assisted hatching, Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Implantation, In vitro fertilization, Partial and total assisted hatching
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of total or partial assisted hatch- ing on the clinical pregnancy rates in assisted reproduction technology. STUDY DESIGN: This was a case-control study conducted from the beginning of January 2016 to the end of June 2017. A total of 404 cycles were included in this case-control study. Study population was divided into 3 groups: Group 1: Partial assisted hatching (n=118), Group 2: Total assisted hatching (n=81) and Control group (n=205). RESULTS: In women of all ages, clinical pregnancy rates were similar between groups with total or par- tial assisted hatching compared to control group (p>0.05). The rates were also similar in subgroups of women with blastocyst or cleavage stage embryo transfers (p>0.05). Partial or total embryo hatching did not result in favorable outcome compared to the control group either in women over 35 or younger than 35 years of age (p>0.05). In whole study group, pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the group with blastocyst stage embryo transfers (22.4 % versus 48.8%, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Partial or total assisted hatching do not have any impact on the clinical pregnancy rates, no significant impact was determined in the subgroup of women either. Keywords: Assisted hatching, Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Implantation, In vitro fertilization, Partial and total assisted hatching

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BİLGİÇ, B. E., ÖZKAYA, E., ABİDE, Ç. Y., ESER, S. K., ŞANVERDİ, İ., KUTLU, T. (2019). Effect of Total Versus Partial Assisted Hatching on the Clinical Pregnancy Rates in Assisted Reproduction Technology. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 22–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/161119

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Plachot M. Viability of preimplantation embryos. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;6(2):327-38. 2. Cohen J, Alikani M, Liu HC, Rosenwaks Z. Rescue of human embryos by micromanipulation. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;8(1):95-116.
  2. Yaron Y, Botchan A, Amit A, Peyser MR, David MP, Lessing JB. Endometrial receptivity in the light of modern assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 1994;62 (2):225-32.
  3. Drobnis EZ, Andrew JB, Katz DF. Biophysical properties of the zona pellucida measured by capillary suction: is zona hardening a mechanical phenomenon? J Exp Zool. 1988;245(2):206-19.
  4. Cohen J, Malter H, Fehilly C, Wright G, Elsner C, Kort H, et al. Implantation of embryos after partial opening of oocyte zonapellucida to faciliate sperm penetration. Lancet. 1988;2(8603):162. Alikani M, Cohen J, Liccardi FL et al. Micro - manipulation: In: Asch RH, Studd JWW (eds) Annual Progress in Reproductive Medicine. Parthenon, New York, pp. 1993:1-18. al-Nuaim LA, Jenkins JM. Assisted hatching in assisted reproduction. BJOG. 2002;109(8):856-62.
  5. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferranetti AP, Fortini D, Aicardi G, Montanaro N. Rescue of implantation potential in em- bryos with poor prognosis by assisted zona hatching. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(5):1331-5.
  6. Primi MP, Senn A, Montag M, Van der Ven H, Mandelbaum J, Veiga A, et al. A European multicentre prospective randomized study to assess the use of assisted hatching with a diode laser and the benefit of an immuno- suppressive/antibiotic treatment in different patient populations. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(10):2325-33.
  7. Gabrielsen A, Agerholm I, Toft B, Hald F, Petersen K, Aagaard J, et al. Assisted hatching improves implantation rates on cryopreserved-thawed embryos. A randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(10):2258-62.
  8. Edi-Osagie E, Hooper L. Seif MW. The impact of assisted hatching on live birth rates and outcomes of assisted con- ception: a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(9): 1828-35.
  9. Sallam HN, Sadek SS, Agameya AF. Assisted hatching a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20(8):332-42.
  10. Tao J, Tamis R. Application of assisted hatching for 2-day- old, frozen-thawed embryo transfer in a poor-prognosis population. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14(2):128-30.
  11. Chao Kh, Chen SU, Chen HF, Wu MY, Yang YS, Ho HN. Assisted hatching increases the implantation and preg- nancy rate of in vitro fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer (ET), but not that of IVF-tubal ET in patients with re- peated