KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Experimental Biomedical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

The role of diffusion weighted imaging in magnetic resonance to evaluate breast masses

Aysu Başak ÖZBALCI
Emine ÖZTÜRK
Cüneyt YÜCESOY
Gökhan Selçuk ÖZBALCI
Gaye Ebru ŞEKER
Sayfa
37–46
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Diffusion imaging can be used in differentiation of malign and benign breast lesions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: To investigate the role of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values preoperatively.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: A total of 30 women between the ages of 14-75 years (mean, 47, 6 years) with 30 histopathologically verified breast lesions were investigated in this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Diffusion imaging can be used in differentiation of malign and benign breast lesions.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Aim: To investigate the role of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values preoperatively. Methods: A total of 30 women between the ages of 14-75 years (mean, 47, 6 years) with 30 histopathologically verified breast lesions were investigated in this study. The patients were examined by a 1 , 5 T MRI device using bilateral phased array breast coil. Spin echo planar diffusion imaging was used to scan patients. Images were obtained by b values 0 and 500 seconds/mm². Mean ADC values of the benign and malignant lesions were measured and calculated. The comparison between the histopathological diagnoses and the mean ADCs were performed by Mann Whitney U test. Results: The diagnosis of 30 patients with 30 breast lesions were as follows; malign lesions (n=13), benign lesions (n=17). The ADC values were as follows (in units of 10-3mm² /sec): benign breast lesions (range: 1, 09-1, 98, mean: 1 , 45) and malignant breast lesions (range: 0, 59-1, 08, mean: 0, 76). The mean ADC obtained from malignant breast lesions was statistically different from that observed in benign solid lesions (p<0, 01). Conclusion: Diffusion imaging can be used in differentiation of malign and benign breast lesions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZBALCI, A. B., ÖZTÜRK, E., YÜCESOY, C., ÖZBALCI, G. S., ŞEKER, G. E. (2020). The role of diffusion weighted imaging in magnetic resonance to evaluate breast masses. Experimental Biomedical Research, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 37–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/160981

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015
  2. 136(5):359–86. [2]Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010
  3. 127(12):2893-917. [3]Kopans DB. The positive predictive value of mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992
  4. 158(3):521-26. [4]Aberle DR, Chiles C, Gatsonis C, et al. Imaging and cancer: research strategy of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network. Radiology. 2005
  5. 235(3):741-51. [5]Leung JW. Screening mammography reduces morbidity of breast cancer treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005
  6. 184(5):1508-09. [6]Mahesh M. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: digital mammography: an overview. Radiographics. 2004
  7. 24(6):1747- 60. [7]Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001, 220(1): 13-30. [8]Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology. 1999
  8. 211(1): 101-10. [9]Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, et al. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009
  9. 193(6):1716- 22. [10] Hetta W. Role of diffusion weighted images combined with breast MRI in improving the detection and differentiation of breast lesions. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2015
  10. 46 (1): 259-70. [11] Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, et al. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002
  11. 15(6):693– 704. [12] Provenzale JM, Sorensen AG. Diffusionweighted MR imaging in acute stroke: theoretic considerations and clinical applications. AJR 1999
  12. 173(6): 1459– 67. [13] Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intra-voxel incoherent motion imaging. Radiology. 1988
  13. 168(2): 497–505. [14] Guo Y, Cai ZI, Cai YQ, et al. Elementary Clinical Estimation of DWI and ADC Value in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of ISRMRM, Denver, 2000:2158. Proc Intl Sot Mag Reson Med. 2000
  14. Van Bodegraven EA, van Raaij JC, Van Goethem M, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for MRI in breast cancer follow-up: A review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol