Dergiler / The Ulutas Medical Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 4

The Use of Abdominal FDG-PET/CT Images in Coincidental Diagnosis of Common Left Renal Vein Variations

Sevin Ayaz(Department of Medical Imaging Techniques, Toros University, Vocational School; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Mersin State Hospital, Mersin, Turkey)
Sayfa
180–181
Yayın Tarihi
2016-10-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Demonstration of these major LRV variations by FDG-PET/CT imaging as well as by other imaging methods is of great significance, both surgically and diagnostically.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:I want to draw attention to the utility of abdominal [ 18F] 2-fluoro-2-deoxy D-glucose FDG -positron emission tomography PET / computed tomography CT images of oncology patients in diagnosis of coincidental retroaortic left renal vein RLRV and circumaortic left renal vein CLRV , which are among the most common left renal vein LRV variations.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:I want to draw attention to the utility of abdominal [ 18F] 2-fluoro-2-deoxy D-glucose FDG -positron emission tomography PET / computed tomography CT images of oncology patients in diagnosis of coincidental retroaortic left renal vein RLRV and circumaortic left renal vein CLRV , which are among the most common left renal vein LRV variations.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Demonstration of these major LRV variations by FDG-PET/CT imaging as well as by other imaging methods is of great significance, both surgically and diagnostically.
🔬Tür:Makale
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Abdominal FDG-PET/CT Image · Coincidental Diagnosis · Left Renal Vein Variation

Abstract

I want to draw attention to the utility of abdominal [ 18F] 2-fluoro-2-deoxy D-glucose FDG -positron emission tomography PET / computed tomography CT images of oncology patients in diagnosis of coincidental retroaortic left renal vein RLRV and circumaortic left renal vein CLRV , which are among the most common left renal vein LRV variations. Demonstration of these major LRV variations by FDG-PET/CT imaging as well as by other imaging methods is of great significance, both surgically and diagnostically.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ayaz, S. (2016). The Use of Abdominal FDG-PET/CT Images in Coincidental Diagnosis of Common Left Renal Vein Variations. The Ulutas Medical Journal, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 4, 180–181. https://doi.org/10.5455/umj.20161018071933

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Bartle EJ, Pearce WH, Sun JH, Rutherford RB. Infrarenal venous anomalies and aortic surgery: avoiding vascular injury. J Vasc Surg 1987; 6: 590−3.
  2. Ayaz ÜY, Dilli A, Tüzün ÖM, Hekimoğlu B. Retroaortic left renal vein: CT images: original image. Turkiye Klinikleri J Cardiovasc Sci 2011; 23: 161−4.
  3. Turner RJ, Young SW, Castellino RA. Dynamic continuous computed tomography: study of retroaortic left renal vein. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1980; 4: 109−11.
  4. Marincek B, Young SW, Castellino RA. A CT scanning approach to the evaluation of left paraaortic pseudotumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1981; 5: 723−7.
  5. Koc Z, Ulusan S, Tokmak N, Oguzkurt L, Yildirim T. Double retroaortic left renal veins as a possible cause of pelvic congestion syndrome: imaging findings in two patients. Br J Radiol 2006;79: e152−5.
  6. Dilli A, Ayaz UY, Kaplanoğlu H, Saltas H, Hekimoglu B. Evaluation of the left renal vein variations and inferior vena cava variations by means of helical computed tomography. Clin Imaging 2013; 37: 530−5.
  7. Heidler S, Hruby S, Schwarz S, Sellner-Zwieauer Y, Hoeltl W, Albrecht W. Prevalence and incidence of clinical symptoms of the retroaortic left renal vein. Urol Int 2015; 94: 173−6.
  8. Dilli A, Ayaz UY, Karabacak OR et al. Study of the left renal variations by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat 2012; 34: 267−70.
  9. Ayaz S, Ayaz ÜY. Detection of retroaortic left renal vein and circumaortic left renal vein by PET/CT images to avoid misdiagnosis and support possible surgical procedures. Hell J Nucl Med 2016; 19: 135−9.
  10. Lee JR, Kim JS, Roh JL, Lee JH, Baek JH, Cho KJ, et al. Detection of occult primary tumors in patients with cervical metastases of unknown primary tumors: comparison of (18)F FDG PET/CT with contrast-enhanced CT or CT/MR imaging-prospective study. Radiology 2015; 274: 764−71.
  11. Otero HJ, Yap JT, Patak MA, Erturk SM, Israel DA, Johnston CJ, et al. Evaluation of low-density neutral oral contrast material in PET/CT for tumor imaging: results of a randomized clinical trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: −32.
  12. Melsaether AN, Raad RA, Pujara AC, Ponzo FD, Pysarenko KM, Jhaveri K, et al. Comparison of whole-body (18)F FDG PET/MR imaging and whole-body (18)F FDG PET/CT in terms of lesion detection and radiation dose in patients with breast cancer. Radiology 2016; 281: 193−202.
  13. Gemmel F, Rijk PC, Collins JM, Parlevliet T, Stumpe KD, Palestro CJ. Expanding role of 18F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose PET and PET/CT in spinal infections. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: −51.