KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Nüfusbilim Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 48

DEMOGRAFİK DÖNÜŞÜM VE BAĞIMLILIK ORANLARININ KADIN İŞ GÜCÜNE KATILIM ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

THE EFFECTS OF DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSITION AND DEPENDENCY RATIOS ON FEMALE LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION: THE CASE OF TÜRKİYE

Sercan Dereli(ANKARA HACI BAYRAM VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-4083-8559
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-05
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, kadın iş gücüne katılım ile demografik bağımlılık oranları arasında uzun dönemli bir eş bütünleşme ilişkisi bulunduğunu göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Demografik dönüşüm sürecinde nüfusun yaş bileşiminde meydana gelen değişimler, iş gücü arzı ve toplumsal cinsiyet temelli emek dağılımı üzerinde belirleyici etkiler ortaya çıkarmaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Demografik değişim kuramının öngördüğü üzere doğurganlık ve ölümlülük oranlarındaki gerileme, çocuk ve yaşlı nüfusun göreli ağırlığını dönüştürmekte; bu dönüşüm bakım gereksiniminin düzeyini ve niteliğini yeniden şekillendirmektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, kadın iş gücüne katılım ile demografik bağımlılık oranları arasında uzun dönemli bir eş bütünleşme ilişkisi bulunduğunu göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Demografik Dönüşüm · Bağımlılık Oranı · Kadın İşgücüne Katılım

Özet

Demografik dönüşüm sürecinde nüfusun yaş bileşiminde meydana gelen değişimler, iş gücü arzı ve toplumsal cinsiyet temelli emek dağılımı üzerinde belirleyici etkiler ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Demografik değişim kuramının öngördüğü üzere doğurganlık ve ölümlülük oranlarındaki gerileme, çocuk ve yaşlı nüfusun göreli ağırlığını dönüştürmekte; bu dönüşüm bakım gereksiniminin düzeyini ve niteliğini yeniden şekillendirmektedir. Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de çocuk bağımlılık oranı, yaşlı bağımlılık oranı ve toplam bağımlılık oranı bakım yükünün demografik vekilleri olarak ele alınmakta ve kadın iş gücüne katılım üzerindeki etkileri yıllık veriler kullanılarak Otoregresif Dağıtılmış Gecikme (ARDL) yaklaşımı çerçevesinde analiz edilmektedir. Bulgular, kadın iş gücüne katılım ile demografik bağımlılık oranları arasında uzun dönemli bir eş bütünleşme ilişkisi bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Çocuk bağımlılık oranı uzun dönemde katılımı azaltıcı yönde anlamlı bir etki üretirken yaşlı bağımlılığın etkisi daha çok kısa dönem dinamikler üzerinden ortaya çıkmaktadır. Sonuçlar, demografik dönüşüm sürecinde kadın istihdamının sürdürülebilir biçimde artırılabilmesi için bakım hizmetlerinin kurumsal kapasitesinin belirleyici olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Abstract

Changes in the age composition of the population during the demographic transition process generate significant effects on labor supply and the gendered division of labor. As demographic transition theory suggests, declines in fertility and mortality rates alter the relative weight of child and elderly populations, thereby reshaping both the level and the structure of care needs. In this study, the child dependency ratio, old-age dependency ratio, and total dependency ratio in Türkiye are treated as demographic proxies for care burden, and their effects on female labor force participation are analyzed using annual data within the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) framework. The findings indicate the existence of a long-run cointegration relationship between female labor force participation and demographic dependency ratios. While the child dependency ratio exerts a significant negative long-run effect on participation, the impact of old-age dependency primarily emerges through short-run dynamics. The results highlight that strengthening the institutional capacity of care services is crucial for sustaining women’s labor force participation during the demographic transition process.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Dereli, S. (2026). DEMOGRAFİK DÖNÜŞÜM VE BAĞIMLILIK ORANLARININ KADIN İŞ GÜCÜNE KATILIM ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ. Nüfusbilim Dergisi, Cilt: 48. https://doi.org/10.67031/nufusbilim.1897034

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (59)

  1. Abbasoğlu Özgören, A. A., Ergöçmen, B., & Tansel, A. (2018). Birth and employment transitions of women in Turkey: The emergence of role incompatibility. Demographic Research, 39, 1241-1290.
  2. Akgündüz, Y. E. & Plantenga, J. (2016). Childcare prices and maternal employment: A meta-analysis (Working Paper No. 16/26). Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası.
  3. Angrist, J. D. & Evans, W. N. (1996). Children and their parents’ labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size (NBER Working Paper No. 5778). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  4. Baez, J., Garriga, S., Perova, E. & Tyurkileri, M. (2025). Motherhood and women’s labor market trajectories in Türkiye. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  5. Baker, M., Gruber, J. & Milligan, K. (2008). Universal child care, maternal labor supply, and family well-being. Journal of Political Economy, 116(4), 709–745.
  6. Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75(299), 493–517.
  7. Blau, F. D. & Kahn, L. M. (2007). Changes in the labor supply behavior of married women: 1980–2000. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(3), 393–438.
  8. Bloom, D. E. & Williamson, J. G. (1998). Demographic transitions and economic miracles in emerging Asia. The World Bank Economic Review, 12(3), 419–455.
  9. Bloom, D. E., Canning, D. & Sevilla, J. (2003). The demographic dividend: A new perspective on the economic consequences of population change. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
  10. Bolin, K., Lindgren, B. & Lundborg, P. (2008). Your next of kin or your own career? Caring and working among the 50+ of Europe. Journal of Health Economics, 27, 718–738.
  11. Campbell, J. C., Ikegami, N. & Gibson, M. J. (2010). Lessons from public long-term care insurance in Germany and Japan. Health Affairs, 29(1), 87–95.
  12. Cascio, E. U. (2009). Maternal labor supply and the introduction of kindergartens into American public schools. Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 140–170.
  13. Colombo, F., Llena-Nozal, A., Mercier, J. & Tjadens, F. (2011). Help wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care (OECD Health Policy Studies). Paris: OECD Publishing.
  14. Cuberes, D. & Teignier, M. (2016). Aggregate effects of gender gaps in the labor market: A quantitative estimate. Journal of Human Capital, 10(1), 1–32.
  15. Daly, M. & Lewis, J. (2000). The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 281–298.
  16. De Henau, J., Himmelweit, S., Lapniewska, Z. & Perrons, D. (2016). Investing in the care economy: A gender analysis of employment stimulus in seven OECD countries. Brussels: International Trade Union Confederation.
  17. Del Boca, D. (2002). The effect of child care and part-time opportunities on participation and fertility decisions in Italy. Journal of Population Economics, 15, 549–573.
  18. Demiryürek Ürper, T. & Ayan Özbek, Ş. (2024). Investigating the factors affecting female labor force participation in Türkiye: A study based on the Household Labor Force Survey 2022 (STPS-WP-24/02, TEKPOL Working Paper Series). Ankara: Middle East Technical University, Science and Technology Policies Research Center (TEKPOL).
  19. Domit, S. & Kesimal, D. (2024). Labor market gender gaps in Türkiye: A bird’s eye view (IMF Working Paper No. WP/24/171). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
  20. Domit, S., Gaafar, Y., MacDonald, D. & Osorio-Buitron, C. (2025). Tax reform, subsidies, and labor supply: Lessons from Türkiye (IMF Working Paper No. WP/25/187). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
  21. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Ferrant, G., Pesando, L. M. & Nowacka, K. (2014). Unpaid care work: The missing link in the analysis of gender gaps in labour outcomes. Paris: OECD Development Centre.
  23. Folbre, N. (1994). Who pays for the kids? Gender and the structures of constraint. London: Routledge.
  24. Folbre, N. (2006). Measuring care: Gender, empowerment, and the care economy. Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 183–199.
  25. Galor, O. & Weil, D. N. (1996). The gender gap, fertility, and growth. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 374–387.
  26. Goldin, C. (1994). The U-shaped female labor force function in economic development and economic history (NBER Working Paper No. 4707). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  27. Gökmen, Ç. E. (2022). A new perspective on women’s care burden and employment in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 66, 11–34.
  28. Halim, D., O’Sullivan, M. B. & Sahay, A. (2023). Increasing female labor force participation (World Bank Group Gender Thematic Policy Notes Series: Evidence and Practice Note). Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
  29. Havnes, T. & Mogstad, M. (2011). No child left behind: Subsidized child care and children’s long-run outcomes. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(2), 97–129.
  30. Heath, R., Bernhardt, A., Borker, G., Fitzpatrick, A., Keats, A., McKelway, M., Menzel, A., Molina, T. & Sharma, G. (2024). Female labour force participation. VoxDevLit, 11(1). Himmelweit, S. (2007). The prospects for caring: Economic theory and policy analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31, 581–599. Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The second shift. Harmondsworth: Viking. ILO. (2018). Care work and care jobs for the future of decent work. Geneva: International Labour Office. ILO. (2025). Women at work in G20 countries: Progress and policy action in 2024. Geneva: International Labour Office. İlkkaracan, İ. & Memiş, E. (2021). Transformations in the gender gaps in paid and unpaid work during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from Turkey. Feminist Economics, 27(1–2), 288–309.
  31. İlkkaracan, İ. (2012). Why so few women in the labor market in Turkey? Feminist Economics, 18(1), 1–37.
  32. İlkkaracan, İ., Kim, K., Masterson, T., Memiş, E. & Zacharias, A. (2021). The impact of investing in social care on employment generation, time- and income-poverty by gender: A macro-micro policy simulation for Turkey. World Development, 144, 105–115.
  33. İzdeş Terkoğlu, Ö., & Memiş, E. (2022). Impact of elderly care on “sandwiched-generation” women in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 66, 88-121.
  34. Johnson, R. W. & Lo Sasso, A. T. (2006). The impact of elder care on women’s labor supply. Inquiry, 43(3), 195–210.
  35. Klasen, S. & Lamanna, F. (2009). The impact of gender inequality in education and employment on economic growth: New evidence for a panel of countries. Feminist Economics, 15(3), 91–132.
  36. Kongar, E. & Memiş, E. (2017). Gendered patterns of time use over the life cycle: Evidence from Turkey (Working Paper No. 884). New York: Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.
  37. Lee, R. & Mason, A. (2011). Population aging and the generational economy: A global perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  38. Lee, R. (2003). The demographic transition: Three centuries of fundamental change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 167–190.
  39. Mincer, J. (1962). Labor force participation of married women: A study of labor supply. In Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research (Ed.), Aspects of labor economics (pp. 63–105). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  40. OECD. (2011). Doing better for families. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  41. OECD. (2017). The pursuit of gender equality: An uphill battle. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  42. OECD. (2025a). Gender equality at work: Gender equality in a changing world – Taking stock and moving forward. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  43. OECD. (2025b). Women, work and the population puzzle: Gender-sensitive responses to demographic change (OECD Public Governance Policy Papers No. 80). Paris: OECD Publishing.
  44. OECD. (2025c). OECD economic surveys: Türkiye 2025 (Vol. 2025/8). Paris: OECD Publishing.
  45. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
  46. Preston, S. H., Heuveline, P. & Guillot, M. (2001). Demography: Measuring and modeling population processes. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  47. Raiber, K., Visser, M. & Verbakel, E. (2024). Strategies of informal caregivers to adapt paid work. European Societies, 26(1), 63–90.
  48. Razavi, S. (2007). The political and social economy of care in a development context: Conceptual issues, research questions and policy options (Gender and Development Programme Paper No. 3). Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).
  49. Tansel, A. (2002). Economic development and female labor force participation in Turkey: Time-series evidence and cross-province estimates (ERF Working Paper No. 0124). Cairo: Economic Research Forum.
  50. Tatoğlu, T. (2022). Drivers of low female labor force participation in Türkiye (Working Paper No. 22/13). BBVA Research.
  51. Thevenon, O. (2013). Drivers of female labour force participation in the OECD (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 145). Paris: OECD Publishing.
  52. TÜİK. (2016). Zaman kullanım araştırması mikro veri seti 2014–2015 (Yayın No: 4426). Ankara: Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu.
  53. UNIFEM. (2000). Progress of the world’s women 2000: Biennial report. New York: United Nations Development Fund for Women.
  54. UNWOMEN. (2019). Progress of the world’s women 2019–2020: Families in a changing world. New York: UN Women.
  55. UNWOMEN. (2020). COVID-19 and women’s economic empowerment: Policy recommendations for strengthening Jordan’s recovery (Research paper). Amman: UN Women Jordan.
  56. World Bank. (2009). Türkiye’de kadınların iş gücüne katılımı: Eğilimler, belirleyici faktörler ve politika çerçevesi (Rapor No. 48508-TR). Washington, DC: World Bank.
  57. World Bank. (2011). World development report 2012: Gender equality and development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  58. World Bank. (2018). Turkey country gender assessment 2017. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  59. World Bank. (2024). Women, business and the law 2024. Washington, DC: World Bank.