KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

Oral N-Acetyl Cysteine for Meconium Ileus of Preterm Infants

Gülsüm KADIOĞLU ŞİMŞEK
Sema ARAYICI
Mehmet BÜYÜKTİRYAKİ
Nilüfer OKUR
Gözde KANMAZ KUTMAN
Şerife Suna OĞUZ
Sayfa
169–173
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

CONCLUSION: According to this study, it can be stated that orally administered n-acetyl cysteine is tolerable and as effective as rectal n-acetyl cysteine when used for MIPI.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE: Meconium ileus of preterm infant is a kind of intestinal obstruction.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:STUDY DESIGN: During the study period, preterm infants under 1.250 g and have clinical signs of meconium obstruction were retrospectively included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:CONCLUSION: According to this study, it can be stated that orally administered n-acetyl cysteine is tolerable and as effective as rectal n-acetyl cysteine when used for MIPI.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

OBJECTIVE: Meconium ileus of preterm infant is a kind of intestinal obstruction. There is no standard medical treatment of meconium ileus of preterm infant. STUDY DESIGN: During the study period, preterm infants under 1.250 g and have clinical signs of meconium obstruction were retrospectively included in the study. In the first two days, rectal saline and metoclopramide started and if not respond these infants assigned to receive oral or rectal n-acetyl cysteine and control group remained to receive a saline enema. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one infants were included in the study. Thirty-four of them received oral n-acetyl cysteine (group 1) and fifty-two had treated with rectal n-acetyl cysteine (group 2), thirty-five of them served as a control group (group 3). The mean gestational ages were 28, 28, 27 weeks and birthweights were 942, 1.010, 965 grams for group 1 & 2 & 3 respectively. There was a difference between groups for reaching full enteral feedings (13±2, 13±3, 15±3, group 1 & 2 & 3 respectively, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: According to this study, it can be stated that orally administered n-acetyl cysteine is tolerable and as effective as rectal n-acetyl cysteine when used for MIPI.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞİMŞEK, G. K., ARAYICI, S., BÜYÜKTİRYAKİ, M., OKUR, N., KUTMAN, G. K., OĞUZ, Ş. S. (2019). Oral N-Acetyl Cysteine for Meconium Ileus of Preterm Infants. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 169–173. https://ajindex.com/articles/159632

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Dimmitt RA, Moss RL. Meconium diseases in infants with very low birth weight. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2000; 9(2):79-83
  2. Kumar SL, Dhanireddy R. Time of first stool in premature infants: Effect of gestational age and illness severity. J Pediatr. 1995;127(6):971-4
  3. Wang PA, Huang FY. Time of the first defaecation and urination in very low birth weight infants. Eur J Pediatr. 1994;153(4):279-83
  4. Jhaveri MK, Kumar SP. Passage of the first stool in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 1987;79(6):1005-7
  5. Weaver LT, Lucas A. Development of bowel habit in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child. 1993; 68 (3 Spec No): 317-20
  6. Siegel MJ, Shackelford GD, McAlister WH. Neonatal meconium blockage in the ileum and proximal colon. Radiology. 1979;132(1):79-82
  7. Vinograd I, Mogle P, Peleg O, Alpan G, Lernau OZ. Meconium disease in premature infants with very low birth weight. J Pediatr. 1983;103(6):963-6
  8. Krasna IH, Rosenfeld D, Salerno P. Is it necrotizing enterocolitis, microcolon of prematurity, or delayed meconium plug? A dilemma in the tiny premature infant. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(6):855-8
  9. Greenholz SK, Perez C, Wesley JR, Marr CC. Meconium obstruction in the markedly premature infant. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(1):117-20
  10. Garza-Cox S, Keeney SE, Angel CA, Thompson LL, Swischuk LE. Meconium obstruction in the very low birth weight premature infant. Pediatrics. 2004;114(1):285-90
  11. Newell SJ. Enteral feeding of the micropreemie. Clin Perinatol. 2000;27(1):221-34
  12. Meetze WH, Palazzolo VL, Bowling D, Behnke M, Burchfield DJ, Neu J. Meconium passage in very low birth weight infants JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1993; 17(6):537-40
  13. Raith W, Resch B, Pichler G, Zotter H, Urlesberger B, Mueller W. Delayed meconium passage in small vs. appropriate for gestational age preterm infants: management and short-term outcome. Iran J Pediatr. 2013;23(1):8-12
  14. Tsukamoto H, Fukuoka H, Koyasu M, Nagai Y, Takimoto H. Risk factors for small for gestational age. Pediatr Int. 2007;49(6):985-90
  15. Karimi A, Gorter RR, Sleeboom C, Kneepkens CM, Heij HA. Issues in the management of simple and complex meconium ileus. Pediatr Surg Int. 2011;27(9):963-8
  16. Burge D, Drewett M. Meconium plug obstruction. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20(2):108-10
  17. Deshmukh M, Balasubramanian H, Patole S. Meconium evacuation for facilitating feed tolerance in preterm neonates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neonatology. 2016;110(1):55-65.