Dergiler / Fırat Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Is Size of the Pre-Operative Annular Tear Measurement a Risk for Early Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation?

Erken Rekürren Lomber Disk Hernisinde Pre-operatif Anüler Yırtığın Büyüklüğü Risk Faktörü müdür?

Sayfa
18–21
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Diameter of the annular rupture in the non-recurrence group was found statistically and significantly lower than the recurrence group. (p <0.001, t =3.71) Conclusion: Although risk of recurrence in lumbar disc hernia depends on many factors, possibility to develop recurrent disc hernia of the patients who have larger annular rupture diameters should be considered as a risk factor.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Majority of the patients with a history of unsuccessful lumbar surgery consists of recurrent disc herniation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Material and Method: Two hundred and seventy patients who were operated in our neurosurgery clinic because of single level lumbar disc herniation between 2012 and 2014 were reviewed retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Diameter of the annular rupture in the non-recurrence group was found statistically and significantly lower than the recurrence group. (p <0.001, t =3.71) Conclusion: Although risk of recurrence in lumbar disc hernia depends on many factors, possibility to develop recurrent disc hernia of the patients who have larger annular rupture diameters should be considered as a risk factor.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Majority of the patients with a history of unsuccessful lumbar surgery consists of recurrent disc herniation. Although risk factors in recurrent disc herniations were comprehensively examined in the literature, association of annular rupture size with recurrence of lumbar disc hernia was not identified. Material and Method: Two hundred and seventy patients who were operated in our neurosurgery clinic because of single level lumbar disc herniation between 2012 and 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. During follow-up, 18 patients who were re-operated because of recurrent disc herniation within the first 6 months and 18 patients who were followed at least for 2 years without any recurrence were included to the study. Among 252 patients, 18 patients who are under follow-up at least for 2 years were selected randomly. The radiologist measured the size of the annular rupture by Lumbar MRI retrospectively. Results: In the statistical analysis, mean annular rupture diameter in the recurrence group was measured as 18.87 (7-28.6 mm; sd 6.29) whereas mean annular rupture diameter in the non-recurrent group was found as 8.82 (5.5-14.5 mm; sd 2.83). Diameter of the annular rupture in the non-recurrence group was found statistically and significantly lower than the recurrence group. (p <0.001, t =3.71) Conclusion: Although risk of recurrence in lumbar disc hernia depends on many factors, possibility to develop recurrent disc hernia of the patients who have larger annular rupture diameters should be considered as a risk factor.

Abstract

Amaç: Başarısız bel cerrahisi olan hastaların büyük kısmını nüks disk hernileri oluşturmaktadır. Rekküren disk hernilerinde risk faktörleri literatürde kapsamlı olarak çalışılmışsa da annüler yırtık büyüklüklerinin nüks lomber disk hernisi ile ilişkisi daha önce tarif edilmemiştir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Kliniğimizde 2012 – 2014 yılları arasında tek seviye lomber disk hernisi nedeniyle ameliyat olan 270 hasta retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Ameliyat olan 270 hastamızın takiplerinde ilk 6 ayında rekküren disk hernisi nedeniyle tekrar opere edilen 18 hasta ve en az 2 yıl takip edilmiş nüks etmemiş 18 hasta çalışmaya dâhil edilmiştir. 252 hasta içinden en az 2 yıllık takipte olan 18 hasta randomize olarak seçilmiş ve annüler yırtık büyüklükleri radyoloji uzmanı tarafından kör olarak ölçülmüştür. Bulgular: Yapılan istatiksel çalışmada nüks grupta ortalama anüler yırtık çapı 18.87 (7-28.6 mm; sd 6.29) olarak ölçülürken, nüks etmeyen grupta ortalama anüler yırtık çapı 8.82 (5.5-14.5 mm, sd 2.83) olarak bulunmuştur. İki grubun karşılaştırılmasında nüks olmayan gruptaki anüler yırtık çapının nüks gruba göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı oranda düşük olduğu izlenmiştir. (p <0.001, t =3.71) Sonuç: Lomber disk hernisinde nüks olma riski birçok faktöre bağlı olsa da anüler yırtık çapları büyük olan hastaların erken dönem rekürren disk hernisi olma olasılığı bir risk faktörü olarak akılda tutulmalıdır.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OZEK, E., SARI, R., BÖLÜKBAŞI, F. H., SİLAV, G., TONGE, M., ELMACI, İ. (2019). Is Size of the Pre-Operative Annular Tear Measurement a Risk for Early Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation?. Fırat Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 18–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/159519

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Crock HV. Observations on the management of failed spinal operations. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1976; 58: 193-9. O’Sullivan MG, Connolly AE, Buckley TF. Recurrent lumbar disc protrusion. Br J Neurosurg 1990; 4: 319 -25. Gaston P, Marshall RW. Survival analysis is a better estimate of recurrent disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85: 535‐7. Suk KS, Lee HM, Moon SH, Kim NH. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Results of operative management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: 672‐6. Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, Kim D. Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 102-8.
  2. Shimia M, Babaei-Ghazani A, Sadat BE, Habibi B, Habibzadeh A. Risk factors of recurrent lumbar disk herniation. Asian J Neurosurg 2013; 8: 93-6.
  3. Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. MR imaging of the lumbar spine: prevalence of intervertebral disk extrusion and sequestration, nerve root compression, end plate abnormalities, and osteoarthritis of the facet joints in asymptomatic volunteers. Radiology 1998; 209: 661-6.
  4. Ross JS, Modic MT, Masaryk TJ. Tears of the anulus fibrosus: assessment with Gd-DTPAenhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989; 10: 1251–4.
  5. Stadnik TW, Lee RR, Coen HL, Neirynck EC, Buisseret TS, Osteaux MC. Annular tears and disk herniation: prevalence and contrast enhancement on MR images in the absence of low back pain or sciatica. Radiology 1998; 206: 49–55.
  6. Ozer AF, Keskin F, Oktenoglu T et al. Anovel approach to the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniations: indications of simple discectomy and posterior transpedicular dynamic stabilization based on carragee classification. Adv Orthop 2013; 2013: 270-565.
  7. Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Hirabayashi K. Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 15; 26: 652-7.
  8. Cinotti G, Gumina S, Giannicola G, Postacchini F. Contralateral recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Results of discectomy compared with those in primary herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999: 15; 24: 800-6.
  9. Dora C, Schmid MR, Elfering A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Lumbar disk herniation: do MR imaging findings predict recurrence after surgical diskectomy? Radiology 2005; 235: 562-7.