KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Business Economics and Finance / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

A NEW APPROACH FOR AIRLINE REVENUE MANAGEMENT: TOTAL REVENUE BOUNDARIES

Asli Emine Ertugrul(TURKIYE IS BANKASI)0000-0002-4104-1103
Ramazan Sahın(Gazı University)0000-0001-7074-4038
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2020-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

TRB keeps the uncomplicated nature of EMSR but gives better results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose - The purpose of the paper is developing and testing an advanced version of an existing method in the literature, which is used for airline revenue management (ARM).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methodology – Expected marginal seat revenue (EMSR) is the mostly used heuristic revenue management model for literature and real life problems.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:TRB keeps the uncomplicated nature of EMSR but gives better results.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Airline revenue management · total revenue boundary · expected marginal seat revenue (EMSR)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of the paper is developing and testing an advanced version of an existing method in the literature, which is used for airline revenue management (ARM). Methodology – Expected marginal seat revenue (EMSR) is the mostly used heuristic revenue management model for literature and real life problems. In the paper, EMSR is developed, and an advanced heuristic method is formed. The new method is called total revenue boundaries (TRB). The method is tested by a problem and compared with EMSRa, EMSRb and EMSRc, which are three types of EMSR in the literature. Findings- According to the results, TRB outperforms than EMSRa, EMSRb and EMSRc. It gives higher revenue levels with higher load factors. Conclusion- At the end of the study, the most common ARM method is improved. By this way, a new heuristic model is gained, which does not need complicated calculations. TRB keeps the uncomplicated nature of EMSR but gives better results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ertugrul, A. E., Sahın, R. (2020). A NEW APPROACH FOR AIRLINE REVENUE MANAGEMENT: TOTAL REVENUE BOUNDARIES. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1214

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (29)

  1. Aslani, S., Modarres, M., & Sibdari, S. (2014). On the fairness of airlines' ticket pricing as a result of revenue management techniques. Journal of Air Transport Management, 56-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.05.004
  2. Banciu, M., Odegaard, F., & Stanciu, A. (2019). Distribution-free bounds for the expected marginal seat revenue heuristic with dependent demands. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 155-163. DOI: 10.1057/s41272-018-00170-6
  3. Belobaba, P. (2015). Airline Revenue Management. P. Belobaba, A. Odoni, & C. Barnhart, The Global Airline Industry. Wiley.
  4. Belobaba, P. (1987). Air Travel Demand and Airline Seat Inventory Management. Doctor of Philosphy. United States of America: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  5. Belobaba, P. (1992). Optimal vs. Heuricstic Methods for Nested Seat Allocation. Proceedings of AGIFORS Reservations and Yield Management Study Group (s. 28-53). Brussels: AGIFORS.
  6. Belobaba, P. (2011). Did LCCs save airline revenue management. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 19-22. DOI: doi.org/10.1057/rpm.2010.45
  7. Boyd, E. A., & Kallasen, R. (2004). Practice Papers: The science of revenue management when passengers purchase the lowest available fare. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 171-177. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.rpm.5170104
  8. Chapuis, J. M. (2008). Basics of Dynamic Programming for Revenue Management. Revenue Yield Management eJournal, 21.
  9. El-Haber, S., & El-Taha, M. (2004). Dynamic two-leg airline seat inventory control with overbooking, cancellations and no-shows. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 143-170. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.rpm.5170103
  10. Elmaghraby, W., & Keskinocak, P. (2003). Dynamic Pricing in the Presence of Inventory Considerations: Research Overview, Current Practices, and Future Directions. Management Science, 1287-1309. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1287.17315
  11. Ertuğrul, A. E., & Şahin, R. (2019). Total Revenue Boundaries for Determining Booking Limits in Airline Revenue Management. 5th International Conference on Engineering Sciences. Ankara.
  12. Fiig, T., Isler, K., Hopperstad, C., & Belobaba, P. (2010). Optimization of mixed fare structures: Theory and applications. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 152-170. DOI: 10.1057/rpm.2009.18
  13. Frank, M., & Friedemann, M. (2009). A simulation study: comparing the Markov decision process approach to the expected marginal seat revenue b heuristic under differing demand behaviour. International Journal of Revenue Management, 133-147. DOI: 10.1504/IJRM.2009.024161
  14. Gelirli, N. (2019). Analysis of Financial Implications Due to Absence of Indegenous Aircraft Leasing Enterprice in Turkey. Journal of Business, Economics and Finance, 235-246. DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1167
  15. Hosseinalifam, M., Marcotte, P., & Savard, G. (2016). A new bid price approach to dynamic resource allocation in network revenue management. European Journal of Operational Research, 142-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.057
  16. Huanga, K., & Liang, Y.-T. (2011). A dynamic programming algorithm based on expected revenue approximation for the network revenue management problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 333-341. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2010.11.005
  17. Kramer, A., Friesen, M., & Shelton, T. (2018). Are airline passengers ready for personalized dynamic pricing? Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 115-120. DOI: 10.1057/s41272-017-0122-0
  18. Lardeux, B., Sabatier, G., Delahaye, T., & Boudia, M. (2019). Yield optimization for airlines from ticket resell. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 213-227. DOI: 10.1057/s41272-018-00167-1
  19. Lee, T. C., & Hersh, M. (1993). A Model for Dynamic Airline Seat Inventory Control with Multiple Seat Bookings. Transportation Science, 252-265. DOI: 10.1287/trsc.27.3.252
  20. Littlewood, K. (1972). Forecasting and Control of Passenger Bookings. AGIFORS Symposium Proc. (s. 95-117). Nathanya: AGIFORS Symposium Proc.
  21. Phillips, R. L. (2005). Pricing and Revenue Optimization. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
  22. Talluri, K., & van Ryzin, G. (2004). The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  23. Tavana, H., & Weatherford, L. (2017). Application of an alternative expected marginal seat revenue method. Journal of Air Transport Management, 65-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.02.006
  24. Topaloğlu, H. (2008). A Stochastic Approximation Method to Compute Bid Prices in Network Revenue Management Problems. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 596-610. DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.1080.0269
  25. Topaloğlu, H. (2009). Using Lagrangian Relaxation to Compute Capacity-Dependent Bid Prices in Network Revenue Management. Operations Research, 637-649. DOI: 10.1287/opre.1080.0597
  26. Weatherford, L. (2004). EMSR versus EMSU: Revenue or utility? Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 277-284. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.rpm.5170114
  27. Wright, C. P., Groenevelt, H., & Shumsky, R. A. (2010). Dynamic Revenue Management in Airline Alliances. Transportation Science, 15-37. DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1090.0300
  28. Yazdi, A. K., Kaviani, M. A., Hanne, T., & Ramos, A. (2020). A binary differential evolution algorithm for airline revenue management: a case study. Soft Computing. DOI: 10.1007/s00500-020-04790-2
  29. Zhang, D., & Cooper, W. L. (2005). Dan Zhang, William L. Cooper. Operations Research, 415-431. DOI: 10.1287/opre.1050.0194