KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies / 2026 / Issue: 8

EU Conditionality on Normalisation Deal of Serbia and Kosovo: Standards Before Status Approach Still Valid?

Pınar Atakara(İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Avrupa Birliği Anabilimdalı)
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2022-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Nonetheless, the political developments proves that mutually-agreed solution to the status issue could be referred as the main incentive of Serbia’s and Kosovo’s commitment to the Dialogue.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:‘Standards before status’ approach referred to eight main conditionality for Kosovo. 2004 events has shaken the confidence in Kosovo’s ability to transform itself to a multi-ethnic and tolerant society and called for the need in addressing Kosovo’s status.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Although Kosovo’s ‘European future’ was adopted in 2005, its contested status has been the most troublesome issue.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Nonetheless, the political developments proves that mutually-agreed solution to the status issue could be referred as the main incentive of Serbia’s and Kosovo’s commitment to the Dialogue.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2004 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Serbia · Conditionality · Normalisation

Özet

‘Standards before status’ approach referred to eight main conditionality for Kosovo. 2004 events has shaken the confidence in Kosovo’s ability to transform itself to a multi-ethnic and tolerant society and called for the need in addressing Kosovo’s status. Although Kosovo’s ‘European future’ was adopted in 2005, its contested status has been the most troublesome issue. This paper argues that complying with standards is still key to the EU condilitionality policy implied. Nonetheless, the political developments proves that mutually-agreed solution to the status issue could be referred as the main incentive of Serbia’s and Kosovo’s commitment to the Dialogue.

Abstract

‘Standards before status’ approach referred to eight main conditionality for Kosovo. 2004 events has shaken the confidence in Kosovo’s ability to transform itself to a multi-ethnic and tolerant society and called for the need in addressing Kosovo’s status. Although Kosovo’s ‘European future’ was adopted in 2005, its contested status has been the most troublesome issue. This paper argues that complying with standards is still key to the EU condilitionality policy implied. Nonetheless, the political developments proves that mutually-agreed solution to the status issue could be referred as the main incentive of Serbia’s and Kosovo’s commitment to the Dialogue.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Atakara, P. (2022). EU Conditionality on Normalisation Deal of Serbia and Kosovo: Standards Before Status Approach Still Valid?. Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies, Issue: 8. https://ajindex.com/articles/1591355

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Bergmann, Julian (2018) “Same Table, Different Menus? A Comparison of UN and EU Mediation Practice in the Kosovo-Serbia Conflict”, International Negotiation, 23 (2), pp. 238-257.
  2. Bieber, Florian (2014) “The Serbia-Kosovo Agreements: An EU Success Story?”, Review of Central and East European Law, 40 (3/4), pp. 285-319.
  3. Borgh, Chris van der, Frerks, Georg & Dirkx, Toon (2016) “Findings on EU peacebuilding capabilities in Kosovo, Afghanistan, Honduras, Guatemala, and Sri Lanka - A Desk Review”.
  4. Economides, Spyros & Lindsay, James Ker (2015) “Pre-Accession Europeanization: The Case of Serbia and Kosovo”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 53 (5), pp. 1027-1044.
  5. Elsuwege, Peter Van (2017) “Legal Creativity in EU External Relations: The Stabilization and Association Agreement Between the EU and Kosovo”, European Foreign Affairs Review, 22 (3), pp. 393-410.
  6. Galluci, Gerard M. (2011) “The Ahtisaari Plan and North Kosovo”, Trans Conflict, November.
  7. Greiççevci, Labinot (2011) “EU Actorness in International Affairs: The Case of EULEX Mission in Kosovo”, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 12 (3), pp. 283-303.
  8. Kartsonaki, Argyro (2020) “Playing with Fire: An Assessment of the EU’s Approach of Constructive Ambiguity on Kosovo’s Blended Conflict”, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 22 (1), pp. 1-18.
  9. Maksimovic, Sandra (2020) “What did Serbia and Kosovo sign in Washington?”, European Western Balkans.
  10. Orosz, Anna (2016) “Implementation of the Belgrade-Prishtina Dialogue: Results, Controversies and Prospects”, the Director General of the Institute for Foreign Affairs and Trade. Peci, Lulzim, Dugolli, Ilir & Malazogu, Leon (2006) “Negotiating Kosovo’s Final Status”, Conference Paper, March.
  11. Ushkovska, Mare (2020) “The EU’s Rivalry With the U.S. Is Complicating Serbia-Kosovo Talks”, World Politics Review.
  12. Visoka, Gezim & Doyle, John (2016) “Neo-Functional Peace: The European Union Way of Resolving Conflicts”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 54 (4), pp. 862-877.
  13. Weller, Mark (2008) “Negotiating the Final Status of Kosovo”, Institute for Security Studies, Chaillot Paper.