Dergiler / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 1

Vasomotor reactivity in the ophthalmic artery

Sayfa
33–37
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Future studies on OA VMR in patients with different degrees of carotid stenosis and determination of changes in the OA VMR as a result of angioplasty or stenting will provide valuable information.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The aim of this study was to obtain information about reactivity differences in ophthalmic artery (OA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) presented as a change in blood flow velocity (BFV) induced by the breath holding in healthy individuals.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Cerebral vasomotor reactivity (VMR) is interpreted indirectly with the increase in the BFV detected in the basal arteries, secondary to a vasodilatory stimulus as breath holding.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Future studies on OA VMR in patients with different degrees of carotid stenosis and determination of changes in the OA VMR as a result of angioplasty or stenting will provide valuable information.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Aim: The aim of this study was to obtain information about reactivity differences in ophthalmic artery (OA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) presented as a change in blood flow velocity (BFV) induced by the breath holding in healthy individuals. Methods: Cerebral vasomotor reactivity (VMR) is interpreted indirectly with the increase in the BFV detected in the basal arteries, secondary to a vasodilatory stimulus as breath holding. Bilateral MCA and OA were evaluated by using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in 15 volunteers. Results: The basal velocities obtained from MCAs and from bilateral OA were symmetrical and did not change according to the side (p>0.05). The ratio of MCA to OA flow velocities had no significant difference between the sides (p>0.05). The OA flow velocities were significantly lower than the ipsilateral MCA flow velocities. Breath-holding index (BHI) was used to evaluate the VMR. Although the BHI values were not symmetrical and statistically different between the sides (p>0.05), the difference between the ipsilateral MCA BHI and OA BHI was significant (p<0.05). We determined the ratio of MCA VMR to OA artery VMR as 1.47±0.15. Conclusion: We found out that the VMR measurement with the BHI method could be used in the OA and VMR in the OA was decreased compared to the MCA on the same side. Future studies on OA VMR in patients with different degrees of carotid stenosis and determination of changes in the OA VMR as a result of angioplasty or stenting will provide valuable information.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAŞIKÇI, M. T., KOÇ, G. (2020). Vasomotor reactivity in the ophthalmic artery. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 1, 33–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/158898

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Bek S, Kasikci T, Genc G, Demirkaya S, Odabaşi Z. Vasomotor properties of the M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery. J Neurol. 2010;257:556-562
  2. Bullock R, Mendelow AD, Bone I, Paterson J, Macleod J, Allardice G. Cerebral blood flow and CO2 responsiveness as an indicator of collateral reserve capacity in patients with carotid arterial disease. Br J Surg. 1985;72:348- 351
  3. Piepgras A, Schmiedek P, Leinsinger G, Haberl RL, Kirsh CM, Einhaupl KM. A simple test to assess cerebrovascular reserve capacity using transcranial Doppler sonography and acetazolamide. Stroke. 1990;21:1306-1311
  4. Markus HS, Harrison MJ. Estimation of cerebrovascular reactivity using transcranial Doppler, including the use of breath-holding as the vasodilatory stimulus. Stroke. 1992;23:668-673
  5. Uzuner N, Ak I, Gücüyener D, Asil T, Vardareli E, Ozdemir G. Cerebral hemodynamic patterns with technetium Tc 99m exametazime single photon emission computed tomography and transcranial Doppler sonography: a validation study using visual stimulation. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:955-959
  6. Hartkamp MJ, van Der Grond J, van Everdingen KJ, Hillen B, Mali WP. Circle of Willis collateral flow investigated by magnetic resonance angiography. Stroke. 1999;30:2671-2678
  7. Demirkaya S, Uluc K, Bek S, Vural O. Normal blood flow velocities of basal cerebral arteries decrease with advancing age: A transcranial Doppler sonography study. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2008;214:145-149
  8. Harisson MJ, Marshall J. The variable clinical and CT findings after carotid occlusion: the role of collateral blood supply. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988;51:269- 272
  9. Hedera P, Bujdakova J, Traubner P. Effect of collateral flow patterns on outcome of carotid occlusion. Eur Neurol. 1995;35:212-216
  10. Schneider PA, Rossman ME, Bernstein EF, Torem S, Ringelstein EB, Otis SM. Effect of internal carotid artery occlusion on intracranial hemodynamics: transcranial Doppler evaluation and clinical correlation. Stroke. 1988;19:589-593
  11. Drayer BP, Djang WT. Physiological considerations in extra and intracranial vascular disease. In: Taveras JM, Ferucci JT, eds. Radiology-diagnosis-imaging-intervention. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1990:1-10
  12. Fisher CM. Circle of Willis: anatomical variations. Vasc Dis. 1965;2:99-105
  13. Van Everdingen KJ, Visser GH, Klijn CJ, Kappelle LJ, van der Grond J. Role of collateral flow on cerebral hemodynamics in patients with unilateral internal carotid artery occlusion. Ann Neu