Dergiler / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 1

Which treatment protocol is better in rehabilitation of joint contracture?

Sayfa
14–20
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Adding TENS or hydrotherapy have no additional benefit on conventional treatment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: To investigate demographic features, treatment response and factors affecting improvement in patients with joint contracture.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Three hundred sixty-one in patients with decreased range of motion were included in this retrospectively observational study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Adding TENS or hydrotherapy have no additional benefit on conventional treatment.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Aim: To investigate demographic features, treatment response and factors affecting improvement in patients with joint contracture. Methods: Three hundred sixty-one in patients with decreased range of motion were included in this retrospectively observational study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients were recorded. According to the physical therapy modalities, patients were divided into three subgroups. All patients received conventional therapy, which consisted of hot pack, therapeutic ultrasound, and stretching exercises. In addition to the conventional therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) was applied to the patients in group A, hydrotherapy (whirlpool) to the patients in group B, TENS and hydrotherapy to the patients in group C. Results: There were 130 (36%) knee, 66 (18.3%) ankle, 58 (16.1%) elbow, 49 (13.6%) wrist, 40 (11.1%) shoulder, and 18 (5%) hip joint cases. Patients had statistically significant improvements of all decreased joint range of motion (p<0.001). Therapy of more than 30 sessions improved only knee flexion and wrist extension significantly. A negative correlation was detected between age and the difference in wrist extension (r=-0.324, p=0.023). Improvements of knee flexion and elbow flexion were significantly better in the acute group than in subacute and chronic groups (p=0.03, p=0.036). There was no statistically significant difference in range of motion of the elbow between the patients who used and those who did not use an adjustable elbow contracture orthosis. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment protocols. Conclusion: Therapy of more than 30 sessions is useful for only knee flexion and wrist extension contracture. Adding TENS or hydrotherapy have no additional benefit on conventional treatment.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TECER, D., YAŞAR, E., ADIGÜZEL, E., KESİKBURUN, S., KÖROĞLU, Ö., TAŞKAYNATAN, M. A., ÖZGÜL, A., TAN, A. K. (2020). Which treatment protocol is better in rehabilitation of joint contracture?. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 1, 14–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/158897

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Michlovitz SL, Harris BA, Watkins MP. Therapy interventions for improving joint range of motion, a systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2004;17:118-131
  2. Monument MJ, Hart DA, Salo PT, Befus AD, Hildebrand KA. Posttraumatic elbow contractures: targeting neuroinflammatory fibrogenic mechanisms. J Orthop Sci. 2013;18:869-877
  3. Müller M, Fischer U, Bartoszek G, Grill E, Meyer G. Impact of joint contractures on functioning and social participation in older individuals -- development of a standard set (JointConFunctionSet): study protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:18
  4. Farmer SE, Woollam PJ, Patrick JH, Roberts AP, Bromwich W. Dynamic orthoses in the management of joint contracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:291-295
  5. Katalinic OM, Harvey LA, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Lannin NA, Schurr K. Stretch for the treatment and prevention of contractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;9:CD007455
  6. Furia JP, Willis FB, Shanmugam R, Curran SA. Systematic review of contracture reduction in the lower extremity with dynamic splinting. Adv Ther. 2013;30:763-770
  7. Harvey L, Herbert R, Crosbie J. Does stretching induce lasting increases in joint ROM? A systematic review. Physiother Res Int. 2002;7:1-13
  8. Nesterenko S, Morrey ME, Abdel MP, An KN, Steinmann SP, Morrey BF, Sanchez-Sotelo J. New rabbit Knee model of posttraumatic joint contracture: Indirect capsular damage induces a severe contracture. J Orthop Res. 2009;27:1028- 1032
  9. Hildebrand KA. Posttraumatic elbow joint contractures: Defining pathologic capsular mechanisms and potential future treatment paradigsm. J Hand Surg. 2013;38:2227- 2233
  10. Jandric S. Effects of physical therapy in the treatment of the posttraumatic elbow contractures in the children. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2007;7:29-32
  11. Lai JM, Francisco GE, Willis FB. Dynamic splinting after treatment with botulinum toxin type-A: a randomized controlled pilot study. Adv Ther. 2009;26:241-248
  12. Berner SH, Willis FB, Martinez J. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome with dynasplint: a randomized, controlled trial. J Med. 2008;1:90-94
  13. Gaspar PD, Willis FB. Adhesive capsulitis and dynamic splinting: a controlled, cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:111-115
  14. Doucet BM, Mettler JA. Effects of a dynamic progressive orthotic intervention for chronic hemiplegia: a case series. J Hand Ther. 2013;26:139-147
  15. Schwartz DA. Static progressive orthoses for the upper extremity: a comprehensive literature review. Hand (N Y). 2012;7:10-17